Disaggregating Poverty Estimates to Sub-County Level using Small Area Model: Application of EBP
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47941/ijpid.3494Keywords:
Empirical Best Predictor (EBP), Empirical Best Linear Unbiased Predictor (EBLUP), Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO)Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to integrate Census data with sample survey data to disaggregate poverty estimates at the Sub County level. The aim was to produce estimates that provide more granular data, as current estimates are based on County level estimates.
Methodology: Small Area Estimation (SAE) was utilized by applying the Empirical Best Prediction (EBP) Model. This model assumes a unit-level approach, making use of data sets collected at the household (individual/unit) level. To achieve this, household-level secondary data from the Kenya Continuous Household Survey (KCHS, 2019) were combined with auxiliary covariates from the 2019 Kenya Population and Housing Census (KPHC). Both descriptive and inferential analyses were performed. The data was analyzed using Stata and R-software, and the results have been presented using tables, diagrams, and charts.
Findings: The results demonstrate similar poverty patterns as per county data findings on Kenya poverty report, 2022. The coefficients of variation (CV) for Small Area Estimation (SAE) estimates were consistently lower across most sub-counties. The bootstrap-based measures of uncertainty, including CV and mean squared error (MSE), confirmed that the Empirical Best Predictor (EBP) estimates were more precise.
Unique Contribution to Theory, Policy and Practice: The study recommended that National Statistical Organizations (NSO) implement SAE to routinely produce disaggregated poverty and development indicators at the lowest administrative levels, including Enumeration Areas. By adopting this methodology, the high costs associated with large-scale surveys currently required to achieve sufficient sample sizes for such estimates can reduce significantly. Furthermore, the study emphasizes that strengthening capacity in SAE through targeted training is essential to ensure methodological rigor, maintain data quality, and uphold high statistical standards.
Downloads
References
Alkire, S., & Foster, J. (2011). Counting and multidimensional poverty measurement. Journal of Public Economics, 95(7–8), 476–487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.11.006
Brown, G., Chambers, R., Heady, P., & Heasman, D. (2001). Evaluation of small area estimation methods—An application to unemployment estimates from the UK Labour Force Survey. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 164(1), 47–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-985X.00193
Corral, P., Molina, I., Cojocaru, A., & Segovia, S. (2022). Guidelines to small area estimation for poverty mapping. Washington: World Bank.
Guadarrama, M., Molina, I., & Rao, J. N. K. (2016). Small area estimation of general parameters with application to poverty indicators: A hierarchical Bayes approach. The Annals of Applied Statistics, 10(2), 852–885. https://doi.org/10.1214/16-AOAS920
Pratesi, M. (Ed.). (2016). Analysis of poverty data by small area estimation. John Wiley & Sons.
Rao, J. N. K., & Molina, I. (2021). Small area estimation (3rd ed.). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429061956.
World Bank. (2021). Guidelines to small area estimation for poverty mapping. World Bank. https://www.worldbank.org/en/events/2023/02/07/guidelines-to-small-area-estimation-for-poverty-mapping
KNBS (2020). Kenya Integrated Household Budget Survey 2015/16. Kenya National Bureau of Statistics.
Isabel Molina (2019) — “Small area estimation methods for poverty mapping: a selective review” (selective review / working paper / conference note, May 2019).
Rao, J. N. K., & Molina, I. (2015). Small area estimation (2nd ed.). Wiley
World Bank (2018). Kenya Poverty and Inequality Assessment. World Bank Group.
United Nations Statistics Division. (2022). Handbook on Poverty Statistics: Concepts, Methods and Policy Use.
Parker, P. A., Holan, S. H., & Janicki, R. (2022). Computationally efficient Bayesian methods for small area estimation with non-Gaussian outcomes. The Annals of Applied Statistics, 16(2), 887–904.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Denis O. Onchomba, Dr.Timothy K. K. Kamanu, PhD
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
