Approaches to Optimizing the Loading of Production Lines in the Alcohol Industry
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47941/ijscl.3538Keywords:
Production line, Loading optimization, Bottling scheduling Sequence-dependent changeovers, Warehouse bufferingAbstract
Purpose: This article aims to synthesize empirical evidence from fifteen peer-reviewed studies on production and warehouse planning in multi-product environments, with particular focus on line loading, batch sizing, filtration staging, and buffer management. The objective is to identify conditions under which sequencing, capacity representation, and buffer design improve overall equipment effectiveness (OEE), throughput, and service performance.
Methodology: A structured literature review was conducted, extracting and comparing modeling approaches (mixed-integer programming, heuristics, metaheuristics, simulation), decision variables (SKU grouping, changeover policies, capacity constraints), buffer policies, and performance indicators (OEE, throughput, service level). Findings were synthesized into a cross-study analytical framework highlighting recurring design patterns and operational trade-offs.
Findings: Three consistent conclusions emerged. First, SKU grouping policies that reduce sequence-dependent changeovers significantly increase OEE and stabilize flow, particularly in high-mix environments. Second, explicitly modeling filtration/processing capacity and dynamic constraints prevents micro-stoppages and protects throughput, whereas ignoring such constraints leads to systematically optimistic plans. Third, moderate upstream buffering improves delivery reliability, but benefits diminish rapidly beyond a threshold range. Decomposition- or cooperation-based algorithms outperform monolithic optimization models when product variety is wide and planning horizons are long.
Unique contribution to theory, practice and policy (recommendations):
The study contributes an integrated decision checklist for APS/MES implementation, linking model choice, data requirements, KPI alignment, and bottleneck diagnostics within one operational framework. Practically, it provides managers with a structured method for selecting planning algorithms and buffer policies based on product mix complexity and capacity volatility. For policy and organizational governance, it emphasizes the importance of standardized data structures and cross-functional KPI harmonization to avoid suboptimal planning. Future research should extend analysis to end-to-end models connecting production lines and warehouse systems under real operational datasets.
Downloads
References
Baldo, T. A., Santos, M. O., Almada-Lobo, B., & Morabito, R. (2014). An optimization approach for the lot sizing and scheduling problem in the brewery industry. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 72, 58–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2014.02.008
Georgiadis, G. P., Elekidis, A. P., & Georgiadis, M. C. (2021). Optimal production planning and scheduling in breweries. Food and Bioproducts Processing, 125, 204–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbp.2020.11.008
Mac Cawley, A., Maturana, S., Pascual, R., & Tortorella, G. L. (2022). Scheduling wine bottling operations with multiple lines and sequence-dependent set-up times: Robust formulation and a decomposition solution approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 303(2), 819–839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2022.02.054
Basso, F., & Varas, M. (2017). A MIP formulation and a heuristic solution approach for the bottling scheduling problem in the wine industry. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 105, 136–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2016.12.029
Basso, F., Guajardo, M., & Varas, M. (2020). Collaborative job scheduling in the wine bottling process. Omega, 91, 102021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2018.12.010
Berruto, R., Tortia, C., & Gay, P. (2006). Wine bottling scheduling optimization. Transactions of the ASABE, 49(1), 291–295. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.20227
He, J., Wei, X., Chen, B., Ji, P., Wu, Z., & Huang, Y. (2018). Model for improvement of overall equipment effectiveness of beer filling line based on big data analysis and efficient frontier. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 10(7). https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814018789247
Baldo, T. A., Morabito, R., Santos, T. M. A., & Guimarães, L. S. (2017). Alternative mathematical models and solution approaches for lot-sizing and scheduling problems in the brewery industry: Analyzing two different situations. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2017, 6754970. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/6754970
Lillo Otarola, L., de la Fuente-Mella, H., Peña Domarchi, A., Kundu, A., & Ceroni-Díaz, J. (2025). Optimal scheduling of the wine-bottling process: A multi-dependency model with hydraulic considerations. Applied Sciences, 15(9), 4697. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15094697
García, F. A., Marchetta, M. G., Camargo, M., Morel, L., & Forradellas, R. Q. (2012). A framework for measuring logistics performance in the wine industry. International Journal of Production Economics, 135(1), 284–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.08.003
De la Garza, F., & Boulton, R. (1984). The modeling of wine filtrations. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 35(4), 189–195. https://doi.org/10.5344/ajev.1984.35.4.189
El Rayess, Y., Albasi, C., Bacchin, P., Taillandier, P., Mietton-Peuchot, M., & Devatine, A. (2011). Cross-flow microfiltration of wine: Effect of colloids on critical fouling conditions. Journal of Membrane Science, 385–386, 177–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2011.09.037
Rosária, M., Oliveira, M., Correia, A. C., & Jordão, A. M. (2022). Impact of cross-flow and membrane plate filtrations under winery-scale conditions on phenolic composition, chromatic characteristics and sensory profile of different red wines. Processes, 10(2), 284. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10020284
El Rayess, Y., Manon, Y., Jitariouk, N., Albasi, C., Mietton-Peuchot, M., Devatine, A., & Fillaudeau, L. (2016). Wine clarification with rotating and vibrating filtration (RVF): Investigation of the impact of membrane material, wine composition and operating conditions. Journal of Membrane Science, 505, 47–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2016.03.058
Guimarães, L., Klabjan, D., & Almada-Lobo, B. (2012). Annual production budget in the beverage industry. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 25(2), 229–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2011.05.011
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Tetiana Kashtalian

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.