Autonomous Multi-Jurisdictional Logistics under 21st Century Trade Fragmentation

Authors

  • Ravindra Kumar Patro Zum Services Inc.
  • Susruta Satapathy Tata Consultancy Services
  • Subhash Chandra Amazon.com, Inc.
  • Nitin Rakheja Zoox

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47941/ijscl.3729

Keywords:

Autonomous Logistics, Customs Compliance, AI Governance, Cybersecurity Resilience, Trade Fragmentation

Abstract

Purpose: This study develops an operating model for autonomous, multi-jurisdictional freight flows that must simultaneously meet requirements for customs risk management, cybersecurity resilience, AI governance, and cross-border data stewardship, addressing the compliance and governance challenges created by the convergence of trade fragmentation and autonomous logistics deployment.

Methodology: A multi-case, document-based comparative analysis was applied, anchored in recent EU border-risk reforms (ICS2 Release 3), security baselines (WCO SAFE), and horizontal regulatory regimes (NIS2, the EU AI Act, and eIDAS 2.0). Documents were coded using a structured scheme covering data requirements, trust and identity expectations, and operational governance mechanisms.

Findings: The study synthesizes an evidence-first compliance architecture mapping: (i) data elements required for advance cargo security filings; (ii) cryptographic identity and audit trails for automated decisions; and (iii) operational escalation protocols to preserve safety and service continuity under disruption. Corridors implementing decision-level audit trails exhibit lower documentation defect rates and shorter exception cycle times.

Contribution to Theory, Policy and Practice: The paper contributes a practical governance blueprint that is role-segregated, auditable, and interoperable across regulators, alongside a framework for measuring compliance latency and exception handling in autonomous logistics. It enables managers to quantify risk, reduce clearance variability, and maintain uptime in safety-critical delivery networks, while extending compliance theory from episodic documentation to continuous, architecture-embedded assurance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bartlett, P. A., Julien, D. M., & Baines, T. S. (2007). Improving supply chain performance through improved visibility. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 18(2), 294–313. https://doi.org/10.1108/09574090710816986

Bharosa, N., Janssen, M., van Wijk, R., de Winne, N., van der Voort, H., Hulstijn, J., & Tan, Y.-H. (2013). Tapping into existing information flows: The transformation to compliance by design in business-to-government information exchange. Government Information Quarterly, 30(Suppl. 1), S9–S18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.08.006

Christopher, M., & Peck, H. (2004). Building the resilient supply chain. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 15(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1108/09574090410700275

European Commission. (n.d.). Import Control System 2 (ICS2): Release 3 (including multiple filing and extension to additional transport modes). European Commission, Taxation and Customs Union.

European Commission. (2023). EU‑U.S. Data Privacy Framework: adequacy decision documentation and related materials.

European Data Protection Board [EDPB]. (2023). Materials related to the EU‑U.S. Data Privacy Framework.

European Parliament and Council. (2022). Directive (EU) 2022/2555 on measures for a high common level of cybersecurity across the Union (NIS2). Official Journal of the European Union.

European Parliament and Council. (2024a). Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act). Official Journal of the European Union.

European Parliament and Council. (2024b). Regulation (EU) 2024/1183 on a European Digital Identity Framework (amending Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 — eIDAS). Official Journal of the European Union.

Hesketh, D. (2010). Weaknesses in the supply chain: Who packed the box? World Customs Journal, 4(2), 3–20.

Hofmann, E., & Rüsch, M. (2017). Industry 4.0 and the current status as well as future prospects on logistics. Computers in Industry, 89, 23–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2017.04.002

OECD. (2014). Tax compliance by design: Achieving improved SME tax compliance by adopting a system perspective. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264223219-en

Pajić, V., Kilibarda, M., & Andrejić, M. (2024). Enhancing distribution efficiency through OTIF performance evaluation. Mathematics, 12(21), 3372. https://doi.org/10.3390/math12213372

World Bank. (2023, April 21). World Bank releases Logistics Performance Index 2023 (press release).

World Customs Organization [WCO]. (n.d.). SAFE Framework of Standards to Secure and Facilitate Global Trade. https://www.wcoomd.org/

World Trade Organization [WTO]. (2025). World tariff profiles 2025. WTO Publications.

Wu, L., Lu, W., & Chen, C. (2024). Compliance checking for cross-border construction logistics clearance using blockchain smart contracts and oracles. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 27(12), 2778–2812. https://doi.org/10.1080/13675567.2024.2328718

Downloads

Published

2026-05-24

How to Cite

Patro, R. K., Satapathy, S., Chandra, S., & Rakheja, N. (2026). Autonomous Multi-Jurisdictional Logistics under 21st Century Trade Fragmentation. International Journal of Supply Chain and Logistics, 10(4), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.47941/ijscl.3729

Issue

Section

Articles