What Is the Conceptual Framework of NPO Community Elderly Care from Stakeholder Perspectives: A Content-Analysis Based Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47941/jbsm.1317Keywords:
Nonprofit Organizations, Community Elderly Care, Stakeholder Theory, Stakeholder Participation, Content-Analysis Based ReviewAbstract
Purpose: To clarify the distinctive positions of essential stakeholders and to explore a systematic understanding of the service system of the NPO community elderly care sector, this study seeks to construct a theoretical basis for this sector from the stakeholder perspective.
Methodology: This study adopted the content-analysis based systematic review to synthesize relevant studies and used inductive content analysis method to analyze the mainstream theoretical schools and stakeholder classifications of stakeholder theory in a time-sequence manner, and compare different stakeholder participation modes of the sector.
Findings: Themes of the theory development, classifications of stakeholder theory, and the practices of NPO community elderly care from stakeholder perspectives were coded. It was found that Wheeler and Sillanpa (1998)’s stakeholder model, as a theoretical prototype, helps to explain the roles of essential stakeholders in the sector from social dimensions.
Unique contributions to theory, policy and practice: this study contributed to constructing a conceptual framework exclusively for the NPO community elderly care sector. It is implicated to lend some theoretical basis for clarifying the distinctive roles of essential stakeholders for the management of NPOs to overcome current challenges in practice and providing insights for practitioners to promote the sectoral sustainable development.
Downloads
References
Ackoff, R. L. (1974). Redesigning the future. New York, 29.
Ansoff, H. I. (1965). Corporate strategy: An analytic approach to business policy for growth and expansion. McGraw-Hill Companies.
Bastiaens, H., Van Royen, P., Pavlic, D. R., Raposo, V., & Baker, R. (2007). Older people's preferences for involvement in their own care: a qualitative study in primary health care in 11 European countries. Patient education and counseling, 68(1), 33-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2007.03.025
Brooke, J., & Jackson, D. (2020). Older people and COVID-19 isolation, risk and ageism. Journal of clinical nursing. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15274
Cabral, S., Mahoney, J. T., McGahan, A. M., & Potoski, M. (2019). Value creation and value appropriation in public and nonprofit organizations. Strategic Management Journal, 40(4), 465-475. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3008Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Charkham, J. P. (1992). Corporate governance: lessons from abroad. European Business Journal, 4(2), 8. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/corporate-governance-lessons-abroad/docview/205280873/se-2
Clarkson, M. (1994). A risk based model of stakeholder theory. Proceedings of the second Toronto conference on stakeholder theory, Toronto: Centre for Corporate Social Performance & Ethics, University of Toronto.
Conaty, F., & Robbins, G. (2021). A stakeholder salience perspective on performance and management control systems in non-profit organisations. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 80, 102052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2018.07.001
Davey, A., & Patsios, D. (1999). Formal and informal community care to older adults: Comparative analysis of the United States and Great Britain. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 20(3), 271-299. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022957426159
Dill, W. R. (1975). Public participation in corporate planning—strategic management in a Kibitzer's world. Long range planning, 8(1), 57-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-6301(75)90118-1
Donaldson, T., & Dunfee, T. W. (1994). Toward a unified conception of business ethics: Integrative social contracts theory. Academy of management review, 19(2), 252-284. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1994.9410210749
Durose, C., & Richardson, L. (2015). Designing public policy for co-production: Theory, practice and change. Policy Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1t896qg
Elo, S., Kääriäinen, M., Kanste, O., Pölkki, T., Utriainen, K., & Kyngäs, H. (2014). Qualitative content analysis: A focus on trustworthiness. SAGE open, 4(1), 2158244014522633. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244014522633
Eskerod, P. (2020). A stakeholder perspective: Origins and core concepts. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Business and Management. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190224851.013.3
Ferns, G., Lambert, A., & Günther, M. (2022). The analogical construction of stigma as a moral dualism: The case of the fossil fuel divestment movement. Academy of Management Journal, 65(4), 1383-1415. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2018.0615
Fink, A. (2019). Conducting research literature reviews: From the internet to paper. Sage publications. https://lccn.loc.gov/2018041131
Frederick, W. C. (1998). Moving to CSR: What to packfor the trip. Business & Society, 37(1), 40-59. https://doi.org/10.1177/000765039803700103
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: a stakeholder approach, Pitman. Boston, MA.
Guthrie, J., Petty, R., Yongvanich, K., & Ricceri, F. (2004). Using content analysis as a research method to inquire into intellectual capital reporting. Journal of intellectual capital, 5 (2): 282–293. https://doi.org/10.1108/14691930410533704
Henderson, E. J., & Caplan, G. A. (2008). Home sweet home? Community care for older people in Australia. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 9(2), 88-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2007.11.010
Henry, L., & Van de Walle, E. (1982). International Union for the Scientific Study of Population. Multilingual demographic dictionary: English section. 2nd ed. Liège, Belgium: Ordina Editions.
Hou, J., & Teng, Y. (2015). The evolution of behavioral strategies for damaged public trust in crisis situations:from the perspective of nonprofit organization-public interaction. Journal of China University of Geosciences: Social Sciences Ed., 15(6), 77-85. [危机情境下公众信任受损的行为策略演化博弈——基于非营利组织与公众互动的视角. 中国地质大学学报: 社会科学版, 15(6), 77-85]. DOI: 10.16493/j.cnki.42-1627/c.2015.86.010
Hussey, D. E., & Langham, M. J. (1979). Corporate planning: the human factor. (No Title). https://lccn.loc.gov/78040532
Ji, D. (2021). Restricted dual governance: the dilemma of cooperation between community and social organization in the supply of elderly service (Doctoral Dissertation). Jilin University. [双重治理权受限:养老服务供给中社区与社会组织的合作困境[D]. 吉林大学]. DOI: 10.27162/d.cnki.gjlin.2021.007334
Jiang, Y.(2020). Three positions of social organizations participating in elderly care services. Chinese Social Work, (29): 45. [社会组织参与养老服务的三个定位[J].中国社会工作, (29):45]
Jonsson, F., Carson, D. B., Goicolea, I., & Hurtig, A.-K. (2022). Strengthening community health systems through novel eHealth initiatives? Commencing a realist study of the virtual health rooms in rural northern Sweden. International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 11(1), 39. DOI: 10.34172/ijhpm.2021.08
Ju, T., Meng, J. (2021). Research on the financing mechanism of community home-based elderly care and medical care services: nonprofit organizations as participants [J]. China’s Collective Economy,(18): 3-4. [社区居家养老医养结合服务融资机制研究——以非营利组织为参与者[J]. 中国集体经济,(18): 3-4.]
Kapiriri, L., & Razavi, S. D. (2021). Salient stakeholders: Using the salience stakeholder model to assess stakeholders’ influence in healthcare priority setting. Health Policy OPEN, 2, 100048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpopen.2021.100048
Lawless, M. T., Tieu, M., Feo, R., & Kitson, A. L. (2021). Theories of self-care and self-management of long-term conditions by community-dwelling older adults: A systematic review and meta-ethnography. Social Science & Medicine, 287, 114393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114393
Leahy, A. (2018). Too many ‘false dichotomies’? Investigating the division between ageing and disability in social care services in Ireland: A study with statutory and non-statutory organisations. Journal of aging studies, 44, 34-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2017.09.005
Lindgren, B.-M., Lundman, B., & Graneheim, U. H. (2020). Abstraction and interpretation during the qualitative content analysis process. International journal of nursing studies, 108, 103632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103632
Liu, T., & Wu, Z. (2019). Functional embedding analysis of nonprofit organizations in community home care services in China: a case study of Beijing A canteen and Shanghai B meal assistance site. Journal of Beijing University of Administration(3), 1-9. [我国社区居家养老服务中非营利组织的功能嵌入分析——以北京市 A 助老食堂与上海市 B 助餐点为例. 北京行政学院学报(3), 1-9]. DOI: 10.16365/j.cnki.11-4054/d.2019.03.001
Lundrigan, C. P., Gil, N. A., & Puranam, P. (2015). The (under) performance of mega-projects: A meta-organizational perspective. Academy of Management proceedings, (Vol. 2015, No. 1, p. 11299). Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510: Academy of Management. https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2015.222
Mayring, P. (2014). Qualitative content analysis: theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software solution. Klagenfurt. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-395173
Miragaia, D., Brito, M., & Ferreira, J. (2016). The role of stakeholders in the efficiency of nonprofit sports clubs. Nonprofit management and leadership, 27(1), 113-134. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.21210
Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of management review, 22(4), 853-886. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1997.9711022105
Mitchell, R. K., Van Buren III, H. J., Greenwood, M., & Freeman, R. E. (2015). Stakeholder inclusion and accounting for stakeholders. Journal of management studies, 52(7), 851-877. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12151
Mitroff, I. I., Emshoff, J. R., & Kilmann, R. H. (1979). Assumptional analysis: A methodology for strategic problem solving. Management Science, 25(6), 583-593. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.25.6.583
Moldavska, A., & Welo, T. (2017). The concept of sustainable manufacturing and its definitions: A content-analysis based literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 166, 744-755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.006
Moretti, F., van Vliet, L., Bensing, J., Deledda, G., Mazzi, M., Rimondini, M., Zimmermann, C., & Fletcher, I. (2011). A standardized approach to qualitative content analysis of focus group discussions from different countries. Patient education and counseling, 82(3), 420-428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2011.01.005
Namisango, F., Kang, K., & Beydoun, G. (2021). How the structures provided by social media enable collaborative outcomes: A study of service co-creation in nonprofits. Information Systems Frontiers, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-020-10090-9
Nijmeijer, K. J., Fabbricotti, I. N., & Huijsman, R. (2014). Is franchising in health care valuable? A systematic review. Health policy and planning, 29(2), 164-176. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czt001
O'Hara, J. K., Baxter, R., & Hardicre, N. (2020). ‘Handing over to the patient’: A FRAM analysis of transitional care combining multiple stakeholder perspectives. Applied ergonomics, 85, 103060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103060
Parmar, B. L., Freeman, R., Harrison, J., Wicks, A., Purnell, L., & De Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Academy of Management Annals, 4 (1), 403–445. In. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2010.495581
Pedrini, M., & Ferri, L. M. (2019). Stakeholder management: a systematic literature review. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 19(1), 44-59. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-08-2017-0172
Putri, T. W. S., Kafaa, K. A., & Yuda, T. K. (2020). Community-care approach for social work practice: learning from community-based healthcare for elderly in yogyakarta. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, 23(3), 198-209. DOI: 10.22146/jsp.51896
Ramoglou, S., Zyglidopoulos, S., & Papadopoulou, F. (2023). Is there opportunity without stakeholders? A stakeholder theory critique and development of opportunity-actualization. Entrepreneurship Theory and practice, 47(1), 113-141. https://doi.org/10.1177/10422587211043354
Rendtorff, J. D. (2020). Corporate citizenship, stakeholder management and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in financial institutions and capital markets. Journal of Capital Markets Studies, 4(1), 47-59. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCMS-06-2020-0021
Sakawa, H., & Watanabel, N. (2020). Institutional ownership and firm performance under stakeholder-oriented corporate governance. Sustainability, 12(3), 1021. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12031021
Salamon, L. M., & Helmut, K. (1998). Anheier (eds.). 1998. The emerging Sector Revisited. A summary. The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore. http://ccss.jhu.edu/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2011/11/Emerging-Sector-Revisited_1999.pdf
Savage, G. T., Nix, T. W., Whitehead, C. J., & Blair, J. D. (1991). Strategies for assessing and managing organizational stakeholders. Academy of management perspectives, 5(2), 61-75. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.1991.4274682
Seuring, S., & Gold, S. (2012). Conducting content‐analysis based literature reviews in supply chain management. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 17(5), 544-555. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598541211258609
Shi, J. (2018). Research on the operation mechanism of nonprofit organizations participating in home care services—a case study of Taicheng garden community home care service center in Xuanwu district, Nanjing. Economic Research Guide, (29), 121-122. [非营利组织参与居家养老服务的运行机制研究——以南京市玄武区台城花园社区居家养老服务中心为例. 经济研究导刊 (29), 121-122.]
Starik, M. (1995). Should trees have managerial standing? Toward stakeholder status for non-human nature. Journal of business ethics, 14, 207-217. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00881435
Thomas, W., & Blanchard, J. (2009). Moving beyond place: Aging in community. Generations: Journal of the American Society on Aging, 33(2), 12-17. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26555645
Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence‐informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British journal of management, 14(3), 207-222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375
Vaismoradi, M., & Snelgrove, S. (2019). Theme in qualitative content analysis and thematic analysis. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 20(3). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-20.3.3376
Wang, B., & Wang, B. (2021). Analysis of Stakeholders (2009–2015). China’s Transition on Climate Change Communication and Governance: From Zero to Hero, 51-61. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8832-7
Wang, J., Xu, J., Li, X., Wang, Q., & Liu, Y. (2021). Chengdu Langli: Recreate a Society Adapted for the Elderly. Social Entrepreneurship: An Innovative Solution to Social Problems, 81-110. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-9881-4_4
Wang, H. (2015). How can the cooperation happen: the establishment of relationship between professional social service organization and the community authorities. Social Sciences, (03), 82-89. [合作何以可能:专业社会服务组织与基层社区行政力量的关系建构[J].社会科学,2015,(03):82-89.] DOI:10.13644/j.cnki.cn31-1112.2015.03.009.
Wheeler, D., & Sillanpa, M. (1998). Including the stakeholders: The business case. Long range planning, 31(2), 201-210. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-6301(98)00004-1
Williams, I., & Hattton-Yeo, A. (2015). Ageing Well in Wales: a national movement. Working with Older People. 19(4), 170–176, https://doi.org/10.1108/WWOP-07-2015-0013
Wu, J., Wang, Y., Tao, L., & Peng, J. (2019). Stakeholders in the healthcare service ecosystem. Procedia CIRP, 83, 375-379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2019.04.085
Xie, Y., & Hu, F. (2016). Research on the identification of key stakeholders in forestry enterprises based on Mitchell’s three-classification scoring method. Ecological Economy,32(12), 120-125. [基于Mitchell三分类评分法的林业企业关键利益相关者识别研究.生态经济,32(12), 120-125.]
Xue, J. (2021). Stakeholder analysis in the dynamic and complex environment of megaprojects. https://theses.lib.polyu.edu.hk/handle/200/11025
Yao, D., Hu, H., Harnett, J. E., & Ung, C. O. L. (2020). Integrating traditional Chinese medicines into professional community pharmacy practice in China–Key stakeholder perspectives. European Journal of Integrative Medicine, 34, 101063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eujim.2020.101063
Yiapanas, G., & Thrassou, A. (2022). Football industry stakeholders' salience and attributes-the case of Cyprus, EU. Global Business and Economics Review, 26(3), 231-251. https://doi.org/10.1504/GBER.2022.122383
Zhang, R., Zhang, Z., Peng, Y., Zhai, S., Zhou, J., & Chen, J. (2022). The multi-subject cooperation mechanism of home care for the disabled elderly in Beijing: a qualitative research. BMC Primary Care, 23(1), 186. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-022-01777-w
Zhang, Z., & Guo, C. (2021). Nonprofit-government relations in authoritarian China: A review and synthesis of the Chinese literature. Administration & Society, 53(1), 64-96. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399720934891
Zhang, X & Mou, L. (2014). A review of the government’s purchase of home-based elderly care services. Proceedings of the Party School of the Hangzhou Communist Party, 1(1), 91-96. [政府购买居家养老服务的研究综述.中共杭州市委党校学报, 1(1), 91-96.] DOI: 10.16072/j.cnki.1243d.2013.01.016
Zollo, L., Laudano, M. C., Boccardi, A., & Ciappei, C. (2019). From governance to organizational effectiveness: the role of organizational identity and volunteers’ commitment. Journal of Management and Governance, 23, 111-137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-018-9439-3
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Zhuofeng Li
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
