A Comparative Analysis of Onsite and Remote Work Productivity: Evidence from an Insurance Firm
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47941/jbsm.3254Keywords:
Onsite, Remote work, Employees’ productivity, Hybrid work, Organizational performanceAbstract
Purpose: This study examines the comparative productivity of on-site and online workers within an insurance firm. The study utilized the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to analyze key factors influencing workplace efficiency.
Methodology: This study employed a quantitative approach with 35 surveyed employees. Statistical analysis including t-tests and correlation analyses were employed.
Findings: The research highlights the impact of task completion rates, communication efficiency, and teamwork dynamics on productivity. It also revealed nuanced differences between modalities: on-site workers demonstrate superior collaboration and communication, while online workers benefit from flexibility and autonomy, consistent with previous studies. Notably, unique challenges emerge for each work setting, such as reduced spontaneity in online contexts and distractions in on-site environments. These findings align with earlier meta-analyses that emphasize the contextual nature of productivity determinants.
Unique contribution to theory, practice and policy: The study underscores the importance of hybrid work models, robust digital tools, and tailored training programs to optimize organizational performance. These insights contribute to a broader understanding of effective workplace practices in the evolving insurance industry.
Downloads
References
Aufegger, L., & Elliott-Deflo, N. (2022). Virtual reality and productivity in knowledge workers. Frontiers in Virtual Reality, 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2022.890700
Ban, Y., Kuroha, M., & Warisawa, S. (2022). Sharing work appearance for improvement in remote work productivity. 2022 International Conference on Cyberworlds (CW). https://doi.org/10.1109/cw55638.2022.00022
Bharadwaj, G. (2024). The impact of remote work on employee productivity and well-being: A comparative study of pre and post-COVID-19 era. International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management. https://doi.org/10.55041/ijsrem32944
Chen, W., & Lorenzo, L. C. (2023). Understanding productivity shifts in the context of remote work. International Journal of Social Science and Human Research. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v6-i10-53
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506396576
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Deducto. (2023). The pros and cons of remote vs. on-site work: A comprehensive comparison. Retrieved from https://www.deducto.co
Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429505017
Fischer, U., Mosier, K., Orasanu, J., Morrow, D., Miller, C., & Veinott, B. (2013). Exploring Communication in Remote Teams. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 57, 309 - 313. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931213571068.
Forbes. (2023). The productivity problem with remote work. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com
Fowler, F. J. (2014). Survey research methods (5th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452252171
George, T. J., Atwater, L., Maneethai, D., & Madera, J. M. (2021). Supporting the productivity and well-being of remote workers. Organizational Dynamics, 51, 100869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2021.100869
Han, S., & Hazard, N. (2022). Shared Leadership in Virtual Teams at Work: Practical Strategies and Research Suggestions for Human Resource Development. Human Resource Development Review, 21, 300 - 323. https://doi.org/10.1177/15344843221093376.
Ilag, B. N. (2021). Tools and technology for effective remote work. International Journal of Computer Applications, 174, 13-16. https://doi.org/10.5120/IJCA2021921109
Iqbal, S. T., Suh, J., Czerwinski, M., Mark, G., & Teevan, J. (2020). Remote work and well-being. New Future of Work 2020. https://consensus.app/papers/remote-work-and-wellbeing-iqbal-suh/7368c30e43935682adfb96f9ccefd6a2y
Kotlarsky, J., & Oshri, I. (2005). Social ties, knowledge sharing and successful collaboration in globally distributed system development projects. European Journal of Information Systems, 14, 37-48. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000520.
Mahesh, D. (2024). Remote work: Challenges and strategies for effective management. Shanlax International Journal of Management. https://doi.org/10.34293/management.v11iis1-jan.7156
Mamatha, K., & Kumar, K. (2023). The effects of working remotely on employee productivity and work-life balance. Journal of Advanced Zoology. https://doi.org/10.17762/jaz.v44is6.2442
Martynovskiy, L. Y. (2024). Research on the impact of remote work on employee productivity and well-being. Scientific Notes of the Russian Academy of Entrepreneurship. https://doi.org/10.24182/2073-6258-2024-23-3-98-104
Morrison-Smith, S., & Ruiz, J. (2020). Challenges and barriers in virtual teams: A literature review. SN Applied Sciences, 2(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-020-2801-5
Mortezaee, F., & Sinclair, B. (2022). Design efficacy at a distance: Collaboration between remote design teams. Proceedings - 3rd Valencia International Biennial of Research in Architecture, VIBRArch. https://doi.org/10.4995/vibrarch2022.2022.15225.
Mujtaba, B. G., & Lawrence, E. T. (2024). Workplaces of today and tomorrow to attract and retain top talent. SocioEconomic Challenges. https://doi.org/10.61093/sec.8(2).12-30.2024
Nilufar, N. (2024). Exploring Challenges and Strategies in Managing Remote and Distributed Teams amidst the Rise of Digital Nomadism. Journal of Sustainable Development and Green Technology. https://doi.org/10.54216/jsdgt.040106.
Nwankpa, J. K., & Roumani, Y. F. (2024). Remote work, employee productivity, and innovation. Journal of Knowledge Management, 28, 1793-1818. https://doi.org/10.1108/jkm-12-2022-0967
Panchuk, E. (2023). Organization of remote work: Benefits and challenges. Scientific Papers Collection of the Angarsk State Technical University. https://doi.org/10.36629/2686-7788-2023-1-380-385
Pillai, S. V., & Prasad, J. (2022). Investigating the key success metrics for WFH/remote work models. Industrial and Commercial Training. https://doi.org/10.1108/ict-07-2021-0053
Rot, A., Sobińska, M., & Busch, P. (2023). Programming teams in remote working environments: An analysis of performance and productivity. 2023 13th International Conference on Advanced Computer Information Technologies (ACIT). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACIT58437.2023.10275614
Santos, R. E. S., & Ralph, P. (2022). A grounded theory of coordination in remote-first and hybrid software teams. IEEE/ACM International Conference on Software Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1145/3510003.3510105
Sharma, A. (2023). Managing remote teams in organizations: Best practices for effective collaboration and communication. Psychology and Education, 55(1), 16–23. https://doi.org/10.48047/pne.2018.55.1.16
Shokrollahi, N. (2023). Employee engagement in the era of remote work. International Journal of Innovation Management and Organizational Behavior. https://doi.org/10.61838/kman.ijimob.3.1.15
Stanford Study. (2020). Remote work productivity: Evidence from a 2-year field experiment. Retrieved from https://www.stanford.edu
Suhas, C. (2023). A study on managing distributed and remote teams in it agile projects. ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and Performing Arts. https://doi.org/10.29121/shodhkosh.v4.i2.2023.2285.
Toldy, K., Khail, W., & Vranić, V. (2023). Utilizing organizational patterns to build high-performing remote teams. Proceedings of the 28th European Conference on Pattern Languages of Programs. https://doi.org/10.1145/3628034.3628053
Torres-Sipión, C., Brito-Trujillo, F., Brisolesse, N., Solis-Pozo, M., Evangelista-Azañero, J., Morales-Susanibar, C., Mallqui-Rivera, P., Linares-Cabrera, V., Caro-Soto, F., & Medina-Palma, D. (2024). Management of information systems projects in virtual environments and distributed teams. Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología - Serie de Conferencias. https://doi.org/10.56294/sctconf2024676.
Trochim, W. M. K., & Donnelly, J. P. (2021). Research methods: The essential knowledge base. Cengage Learning. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2021.1891082
Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x
Vijayabaskar, S., Kodyvaur, K., Murthy, K., Cheruku, S., Chhapola, A., & Goel, O. (2024). Optimizing cross-functional teams in remote work environments for product development. Modern Dynamics: Mathematical Progressions, 1(2), 20–30. https://doi.org/10.36676/mdmp.v1.i2.20
World Economic Forum. (2021). Hybrid work and productivity: Emerging trends. Retrieved from https://www.weforum.org
Zahedi, M., Shahin, M., & Babar, M. (2016). A systematic review of knowledge sharing challenges and practices in global software development. Int. J. Inf. Manag., 36, 995-1019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.06.007.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ama Foriwaa Karikari, Evans Osborn Nene Daker Ocansey, PhD
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
