Methodology For Marketing Audit And Growth Prioritization In Smes: Kapri Method A Kpi-Linked Diagnostic Framework
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47941/jbsm.3801Keywords:
Marketing Audit, SMEs, Growth Prioritization, KPI Framework, Marketing AnalyticsAbstract
Purpose: This conceptual research article proposes a KPI-linked diagnostic framework for conducting marketing audits in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). It aims to replace fragmented, short-term growth tactics with a stable, standardized diagnostic routine that directly links observed marketing problems to measurable commercial outcomes.
Methodology: The study synthesizes empirical findings on marketing measurement systems, analytics capabilities, and digital channel adoption. Rather than using original field data, the paper develops an evidence-informed worked example. It operationalizes the framework using secondary performance data and benchmarks from prior empirical studies to specify an audit sequence, decision rules for KPI trees, and prioritization logic.
Findings: The framework formalizes how SMEs can systematically move from raw symptoms (e.g., weak lead quality, volatile demand, low retention) to validated business constraints, resulting in a ranked portfolio of growth interventions. It demonstrates that audit practices can be standardized without becoming rigid by balancing expected impact, feasibility, and measurement confidence.
Unique contribution to theory, practice, and policy: This study advances marketing analytics literature by establishing a causal reasoning discipline that links qualitative diagnostic symptoms to quantitative KPI trees in resource-constrained environments. In practice, it provides SME leaders and marketing consultants with an actionable, structured dashboard design and decision rules to improve accountability and guide strategic interventions. Furthermore, it offers valuable insights for business development agencies and SME support programs on designing effective training modules and diagnostic tools to boost digital literacy and commercial resilience in the small business sector.
Downloads
References
Ambler, T. (2000). Marketing metrics. Business Strategy Review, 11(2), 59–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8616.00138
Baker, S., & Holt, S. (2004). Making marketers accountable: A failure of marketing education? Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 22(5), 557–567. https://doi.org/10.1108/02634500410551932
Clark, B. H. (1999). Marketing performance measures: History and interrelationships. Journal of Marketing Management, 15(8), 711–732. https://doi.org/10.1362/026725799784772594
Gao, Y. (2010). Measuring marketing performance: A review and a framework. The Marketing Review, 10(1), 25–40. https://doi.org/10.1362/146934710X488924
Germann, F., Lilien, G. L., & Rangaswamy, A. (2013). Performance implications of deploying marketing analytics. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 30(2), 114–128.
Homburg, C., Artz, M., & Wieseke, J. (2012). Marketing performance measurement systems: Does comprehensiveness really improve performance? Journal of Marketing, 76(3), 56–77.
Järvinen, J., & Karjaluoto, H. (2015). The use of Web analytics for digital marketing performance measurement. Industrial Marketing Management, 50, 117–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2015.04.009
Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard—Measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71–79.
Kotler, P., Gregor, W., & Rodgers, W. (1977). The marketing audit comes of age. Sloan Management Review, 18(2), 25–43.
Ling-yee, L. (2011). Marketing metrics’ usage: Its predictors and implications for customer relationship management. Industrial Marketing Management, 40(1), 139–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2010.09.002
Michaelidou, N., Siamagka, N.-T., & Christodoulides, G. (2011). Usage, barriers and measurement of social media marketing: An exploratory investigation of small and medium B2B brands. Industrial Marketing Management, 40(7), 1153–1159.
Misirlis, N., & Vlachopoulou, M. (2018). Social media metrics and analytics in marketing – S3M: A mapping literature review. International Journal of Information Management, 38(1), 270–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.10.005
O’Sullivan, D., & Abela, A. V. (2007). Marketing performance measurement ability and firm performance. Journal of Marketing, 71(2), 79–93.
Parveen, F., Jaafar, N. I., & Ainin, S. (2016). Social media’s impact on organizational performance and entrepreneurial orientation in organizations. Management Decision, 54(9), 2208–2234. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-08-2015-0336
Pauwels, K., Ambler, T., Clark, B. H., LaPointe, P., Reibstein, D., Skiera, B., Wierenga, B., & Wiesel, T. (2009). Dashboards as a service: Why, what, how, and what research is needed? Journal of Service Research, 12(2), 175–189. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670509344213
Rust, R. T., Ambler, T., Carpenter, G. S., Kumar, V., & Srivastava, R. K. (2004). Measuring marketing productivity: Current knowledge and future directions. Journal of Marketing, 68(4), 76–89. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.68.4.76.42721
Srivastava, R. K., Shervani, T. A., & Fahey, L. (1998). Market-based assets and shareholder value: A framework for analysis. Journal of Marketing, 62(1), 2–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299806200102
Taghian, M., & Shaw, R. N. (2008). The marketing audit and organizational performance: An empirical profiling. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 16(4), 341–350. https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679160406
Taiminen, H. M., & Karjaluoto, H. (2015). The usage of digital marketing channels in SMEs. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 22(4), 633–651. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-05-2013-0073
Vorhies, D. W., & Morgan, N. A. (2005). Benchmarking marketing capabilities for sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Marketing, 69(1), 80–94.
Wu, W.-K., Chen, H.-C., & Huang, Y.-X. (2015). Antecedents and consequences of marketing audits: Empirical evidence from Taiwanese firms. Asia Pacific Management Review, 20(3), 156–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2014.09.001
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Avetik Andreasyan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.