Beyond Protected Areas: A Systematic Literature Review of Social–Ecological Dynamics in Namibia’s Kunene Region
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47941/je.4015Keywords:
Landscape-scale conservation, Social–ecological systems, Ecological connectivity, Community-based natural resource management (CBNRM), Conservancies, Human–wildlife interactionsAbstract
Purpose: This systematic literature review examines the social-ecological dynamics shaping conservation outcomes beyond formal protected areas in Namibia’s Kunene Region. It specifically explores how communal and multi-use landscapes surrounding national parks contribute to wildlife movements, ecological connectivity, biodiversity conservation, and pastoralist livelihoods.
Methodology: The study employed a systematic literature review approach, synthesizing empirical studies published over the past three decades. The review focused on key social-ecological factors influencing landscape functionality, including governance structures within communal conservancies, human-wildlife interactions, land-use changes, local institutional capacity, and the role of traditional knowledge in conservation management.
Findings: The findings indicate that effective conservation beyond protected areas depends on strong local institutions, cross-boundary coordination, and integration of traditional knowledge. However, varying conservancy capacity, livelihood pressures, human-wildlife interactions, and habitat fragmentation constrain long-term resilience. The review demonstrates that “in-between spaces” connecting national parks are vital for ecological connectivity and sustainable livelihoods.
Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: The review advances conservation theory through a social-ecological systems perspective, emphasizing interactions among ecosystems, institutions, livelihoods, and land use. Practically, it promotes inclusive, adaptive, landscape-scale conservation and stronger communal conservancies. Policy recommendations include strengthening institutional capacity, enhancing cross-boundary governance, integrating traditional knowledge, reducing livelihood pressures, and formally recognizing conservation corridors and multi-use landscapes within national conservation planning.
Downloads
References
Boudreaux, K., & Nelson, F. (2011). Community conservation in Namibia: Empowering communities to manage natural resources. Journal of Sustainable Development, 4(3), 17–30.
Hällfors, M., et al. (2025). Current approaches and future opportunities for climate-smart protected areas. Nature Reviews Biodiversity, 1, 284–297.
Johnson, S., Nyhus, P., & Marker, L. (2020). Human–wildlife conflict and community attitudes in arid rangelands. Conservation Science and Practice, 2(11), e280.
Jones, B. (2011). The evolution of Namibia’s communal conservancies. In R. Roe, M. Elliott & B. Jones (Eds.), Community Rights, Conservation and Development. Earthscan
Jones, T., Chong, K., & Caro, T. (2021). The importance of unprotected lands for biodiversity conservation. Conservation Biology, 35(3), 1080–1089
Kavhu, B., Parker, D., & Kasaona, J. (2023). Wildlife mobility and resource variability in southern African drylands. Journal of Arid Environments, 212, 104921.
Lindsey, P., Allan, J., Brehony, P., et al. (2022). Conserving Africa’s wildlife: The importance of landscapes beyond protected areas. Biological Conservation, 268, 109563.
Naidoo, R., Weaver, L. C., Stuart-Hill, G., & Tagg, J. (2016). Effect of biodiversity conservation on rural livelihoods in Namibia. Biological Conservation, 200, 22–30.
Naidoo, R., Weaver, L., De Longcamp, M., & Stuart-Hill, G. (2021). Namibia’s community-based conservation and its contribution to wildlife recovery. Nature Sustainability, 4, 242–250.
Wolfaardt, A., Uiseb, K., & Brown, M. (2024). Land-use change and implications for connectivity in Namibia’s conservation landscapes. Regional Environmental Change, 24, 17.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Fred Chimiti, Sidney Kawimbe

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.