Strategy VPR-Align Model For Positioning and Differentiation in Marketing Consulting: An Empirical Framework Linking Value Proposition to Revenue Model

Authors

  • Avetik Andreasyan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47941/jpr.3665

Keywords:

Marketing Consulting, Positioning, Differentiation, Value Proposition, Revenue Model, Professional Services, Pricing

Abstract

Purpose: This article examines how value proposition orientation should be aligned with revenue model choice in marketing consulting.

Methodology: The study develops an evidence-coded analytical framework based on twenty sources covering positioning theory, professional-service contracting, fee research, and recent market studies. These sources are coded according to two analytical dimensions: value proposition orientation and revenue archetype. This coding structure is used to identify recurring alignment patterns between consulting promises and pricing logic.

Findings: The findings show that outcome-led and risk-reduction value propositions are most consistently aligned with retainer-based models and, where measurement conditions are sufficiently rigorous, with value-based pricing components. In contrast, capability-led propositions are better suited to fixed-fee or productized models, particularly when consulting methods are modular and standardized. The study also demonstrates that positioning becomes economically persuasive only when the consultancy’s promise is supported by compatible proof structures, contractual logic, and delivery governance.

Unique Contribution to Theory, Policy and Practice: The article makes a practical and conceptual contribution by proposing the VPR-ALIGN Model (Value Proposition–Revenue Alignment). This model explains that differentiation in marketing consulting should be understood not merely as a layer of messaging, but as a structured alignment between the promise made to clients, the evidence used to support that promise, and the mechanism through which the consultancy captures value. For practice, the model offers an applied alignment map for offer architecture, proof building, contracting, and delivery governance. For theory, it advances the understanding of positioning as an economically grounded construct rather than a purely communicative one.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Avetik Andreasyan

Private Consulting

References

Amit, R., & Zott, C. (2001). Value creation in e-business. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6-7), 493-520. doi:10.1002/smj.187

Blankson, C., & Crawford, J. C. (2012). Impact of positioning strategies on service firm performance. Journal of Business Research, 65(3), 311-317.

Deloitte Digital. (2025). Marketing trends of 2025: Embracing change and gearing up for the future. Report.

Gabbianelli, L., & Pencarelli, T. (2024). Exploring some marketing practices in management consulting firms: Evidence from small service firms in Italy. The TQM Journal, 36(9), 280-308. doi:10.1108/TQM-12-2019-0308

Haverila, M., Naumann, E., & McLeod, A. (2011). The drivers of customer satisfaction in strategic consulting engagements: A global study. Management Decision, 49(2), 312-326. doi:10.1108/00251741111163160

Hinge Research Institute. (2024). High Growth Study 2024: Executive summary (9th ed.). Report.

Homburg, C., & Stebel, P. (2009). Determinants of contract terms for professional services. Management Accounting Research, 20(2), 129-145. doi:10.1016/j.mar.2009.03.001

HubSpot. (2025). The State of Marketing report 2025. Report.

Lassala, C., Carmona, P., & Momparler, A. (2016). Alternative paths to high consulting fees: A fsQCA analysis. Journal of Business Research, 69(11), 5096-5100. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.152

LinkedIn. (2024). B2B Benchmark report 2024. Report.

McLachlin, R. D. (2000). Service quality in consulting: What is engagement success? Managing Service Quality, 10(3), 141-150. doi:10.1108/09604520010336669

Momparler, A., Carmona, P., & Lassala, C. (2015). Quality of consulting services and consulting fees. Journal of Business Research, 68(7), 1458-1462. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.01.004

Oesterle, S., Buchwald, A., & Urbach, N. (2022). Investigating the co-creation of IT consulting service value: Empirical findings of a matched pair analysis. Electronic Markets, 32(4), 2355-2378. doi:10.1007/s12525-022-00540-1

Payne, A., Frow, P., Steinhoff, L., & Eggert, A. (2020). Toward a comprehensive framework of value proposition development: From strategy to implementation. Industrial Marketing Management, 87, 244-255. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.03.010

Pemer, F., & Skjølsvik, T. (2019). The cues that matter: Screening for quality signals in the ex ante phase of buying professional services. Journal of Business Research, 98, 352-365. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.03.036

Pemer, F., Werr, A., & Bianchi, M. (2014). Purchasing professional services: Transaction costs, antecedents and consequences of purchasing formalization. Industrial Marketing Management, 43(5), 840-850. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2014.04.008

Porter, M. E. (1996). What is strategy? Harvard Business Review, 74(6), 61-78.

Salesforce. (2024). State of Marketing report (9th ed.). Report.

Teece, D. J. (2010). Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long Range Planning, 43(2-3), 172-194. doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.003

Zott, C., Amit, R., & Massa, L. (2011). The business model: Recent developments and future research. Journal of Management, 37(4), 1019-1042. doi:10.1177/0149206311406265

Downloads

Published

2026-04-25

How to Cite

Andreasyan, A. (2026). Strategy VPR-Align Model For Positioning and Differentiation in Marketing Consulting: An Empirical Framework Linking Value Proposition to Revenue Model. Journal of Public Relations, 5(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.47941/jpr.3665

Issue

Section

Articles