AI, Cognition, and the Cost of Convenience
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47941/jts.3185Keywords:
Generative AI, EEG Activation, Cognitive Offloading, Critical Thinking, Memory Recall, Digital EducationAbstract
Purpose: This study investigates whether overreliance on generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools, such as ChatGPT, diminishes cognitive engagement, memory retention, and critical thinking by analyzing electroencephalography (EEG) activation scores and behavioral outcomes.
Methodology: Using simulated data modeled on the MEMA EEG dataset for 120 participants, the study divided subjects into three groups: unaided writing, AI-assisted writing, and full AI writing. Dependent variables included EEG activation scores, recall accuracy, and standardized critical thinking assessments. Statistical analyses employed analysis of variance (ANOVA), Pearson correlations, multiple regression, chi-square tests, and principal component analysis (PCA) to evaluate the impact of AI reliance on cognitive performance.
Findings: Results demonstrate that excessive reliance on AI significantly reduces EEG activation, recall accuracy, and critical thinking scores, supporting the hypothesis of cognitive offloading. Strong positive correlations were found between EEG activation and both memory retention and analytical reasoning, indicating that diminished brain activity is directly associated with lower cognitive outcomes.
Unique Contribution to Theory, Policy and Practice: The study extends cognitive load theory by providing neurophysiological evidence of AI-induced cognitive disengagement and linking it with behavioral deficits. For theory, it reinforces the concept that external cognitive agents can weaken intrinsic neural engagement. For policy, it underscores the importance of digital literacy initiatives that balance AI integration with the preservation of critical cognitive skills. For practice, it provides educators and AI developers with actionable insights: curricula should embed reflection and retrieval practices, while AI systems should be designed to encourage reasoning and active engagement rather than full automation.
Downloads
References
1. Barshay, Jill. University students offload critical thinking, other hard work to AI. 19 May 2025. Web. 04 August 2025. <https://hechingerreport.org/proof-points-offload-critical-thinking-ai/>.
2. Gerlich, Michael. AI Tools in Society: Impacts on Cognitive Offloading and the Future of Critical Thinking. 03 Januaury 2025. Web. 04 August 2025.
3. Huan Liu, Yuzhe Zhang, Guanjian Liu, Xinxin Du, Haochong Wang, Dalin Zhang. "A Multi-Label EEG Dataset for Mental Attention State Classification in Online Learning." arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.09879 (2024). Web.
4. Wiederhold, B. K. (2025). The Cost of Convenience: Does AI Undermine Critical Thinking?. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking.
5. Nataliya Kosmyna, Eugene Hauptmann, Ye Tong Yuan, Jessica Situ, Xian-Hao Liao, Ashly Vivian Beresnitzky, Iris Braunstein, Pattie Maes. "Your Brain on ChatGPT: Accumulation of Cognitive Debt when Using an AI Assistant for Essay Writing Task." arXiv preprint (2025).
6. ShaohuaTang1, 2,3 & Zheng Li3*. "EEG complexity measures for detecting mind wandering during video-based learning." Nature (2024): 1-12. Web. <https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-58889-9>.
7. Unesco. Use of AI in education: Deciding on the future we want. 29 May 2024. Web. <https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/use-ai-education-deciding-future-we-want>.
8. Yavich, Roman. "Will the Use of AI Undermine Students Independent Thinking?" Education Sciences (2025). Web.
9. Jeffares, S. (2020). Control, Cost, Convenience and Connection, Four Problems for AI and Public Service. In The Virtual Public Servant: Artificial Intelligence and Frontline Work (pp. 19-41). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
10. Leonelli, S., & Mussgnug, A. (2025). Convenience AI.
11. Klaus, P., & Zaichkowsky, J. L. (2022). The convenience of shopping via voice AI: Introducing AIDM. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 65, 102490.
12. Kawakami, H., & Hiraoka, T. (2013, December). Contemplating AI technologies from the viewpoint of benefit of inconvenience. In 2013 Conference on Technologies and Applications of Artificial Intelligence (pp. 335-336). IEEE.
13. Grinschgl, S., & Neubauer, A. C. (2022). Supporting cognition with modern technology: Distributed cognition today and in an AI-enhanced future. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 5, 908261.
14. Wang, X., Liu, Y., He, W., WUJI, S., & Luo, R. (2022). The impact of artificial intelligence voice assistants on consumer experience based on the cognitive-affective-conative model. Available at SSRN 4017405.
15. Nizamani, M., Ramzan, F., Fatima, M., & Asif, M. (2024). Investigating How Frequent Interactions with AI Technologies Impact Cognitive and Emotional Processes. Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), 13(3), 316-325.
16. Felman, E., Kerridge, I., Vered, M., & Komesaroff, P. (2025). Reflections on the Cloak of Convenience. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 1-10.
17. Srivastava, P. K., Sharma, A., Whig, V., Malaviya, S., & Kumar, N. (2025). Review Of Transforming Grocery Shopping with Artificial Intelligent: A New Era of Convenience. Advances in Consumer Research, 2(2), 665-675.
18. Ghazwani, S., van Esch, P., Cui, Y., & Gala, P. (2022). Artificial intelligence, financial anxiety and cashier-less checkouts: a Saudi Arabian perspective. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 40(6), 1200-1216.
19. Wirtz, J. (2020). Organizational ambidexterity: cost-effective service excellence, service robots, and artificial intelligence. Organizational Dynamics, 49(3), 1-9.
20. Gerlich, M. (2025). AI tools in society: Impacts on cognitive offloading and the future of critical thinking. Societies, 15(1), 6.
21. He, A., Bae, K. K., Newman, T. R., Gaeddert, J., Kim, K., Menon, R., ... & Tranter, W. H. (2010). A survey of artificial intelligence for cognitive radios. IEEE transactions on vehicular technology, 59(4), 1578-1592.
22. Zhao, J., & Kerdpitak, C. (2023, March). A study of consumer innovativeness and service convenience on the intention to use robot services in hotels. In INTERNATIONAL ACADEMIC MULTIDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH CONFERENCE IN ZURICH 2023 (pp. 305-322).
23. Konar, A. (2018). Artificial intelligence and soft computing: behavioral and cognitive modeling of the human brain. CRC press.
24. Prentice, C., Weaven, S., & Wong, I. A. (2020). Linking AI quality performance and customer engagement: The moderating effect of AI preference. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 90, 102629.
25. Mutya, T., & Ilankadhir, M. How Convenient are Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning for Adoption among SMEs? Developing Countries Perspective.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Neetan Narayan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
