Event-Driven GitOps for Continuous STIG-Based Compliance on Regulated Kubernetes Fleets: Measuring Patch Exposure on Amazon Linux 2023
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47941/jts.4050Keywords:
GitOps, STIG Compliance, FedRAMP High, Amazon Linux 2023, Patch ExposureAbstract
Purpose: Federal Kubernetes fleets operating under a FedRAMP High authorization boundary must remain continuously aligned with a Security Technical Implementation Guide (STIG) baseline while also consuming upstream security patches within bounded time. In immutable-infrastructure and GitOps operating models both obligations are discharged by periodic rebuilding of a hardened machine image, yet the rebuild cadence is typically set by organisational convention rather than by the arrival process of the fixes it is meant to consume. This paper measures the exposure and cost consequences of that mismatch for Amazon Linux 2023.
Methodology: Using a dated series of 113 Amazon Linux 2023 security repository releases over a 41-month window, we compare seven trigger regimes — calendar-driven and event-driven — under a phase-averaged exposure model, evaluating both the unpatched exposure window and annualized build cost.
Findings: Repository releases arrive approximately eight times more frequently than the documented quarterly cadence, and an event-driven GitOps trigger dominates every calendar regime evaluated on both exposure and cost. The dominance follows from a structural feature of the arrival process, not from any operational parameter, and is invariant across a twenty-four-fold range of pipeline durations.
Unique contribution to theory, practice and policy: Rebuild cadence is the wrong control variable for continuous compliance in this setting; the relevant variable is whether build issuance is coupled to patch availability. The result gives practitioners and compliance program owners a measured basis for replacing calendar-based rebuild schedules with event-coupled triggers, without incurring the cost penalty of a naive “rebuild more often” strategy.
Downloads
References
Amazon Web Services. (n.d.). Amazon Linux 2023 release notes. Retrieved August 8, 2026, from https://docs.aws.amazon.com/linux/al2023/release-notes/relnotes.html
Angermeir, F., Fischbach, J., Moyón, F., & Mendez, D. (2024). Towards automated continuous security compliance. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement. https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.21494
Beetz, F., & Harrer, S. (2022). GitOps: The evolution of DevOps? IEEE Software, 39(4), 70–75. https://doi.org/10.1109/MS.2021.3119106
Frei, S., May, M., Fiedler, U., & Plattner, B. (2006). Large-scale vulnerability analysis. In Proceedings of the 2006 SIGCOMM Workshop on Large-Scale Attack Defense (pp. 131–138). https://doi.org/10.1145/1162666.1162671
Gupta, P., Sharma, A., & Tak, A. (2026, May). AI-powered event-driven Amazon EKS AMI updates with GitOps. AWS Containers Blog. https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/containers/ai-powered-event-driven-amazon-eks-ami-updates-with-gitops/
Hamara, A., Horne, D., Rojas, A., Kurniawan, T., Lamothe, S., Suresh, V., Turoci, N., & Wong, L. (2026). SHIELDS: Automating OS hardening with iterative multi-agent remediation. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Security and Management (SAM’26). https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.05476
Morris, K. (2020). Infrastructure as code: Managing servers in the cloud (2nd ed.). O’Reilly Media.
National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2020). Security and privacy controls for information systems and organizations (NIST Special Publication 800-53, Rev. 5). https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.800-53r5
Shu, R., Gu, X., & Enck, W. (2017). A study of security vulnerabilities on Docker Hub. In Proceedings of the Seventh ACM Conference on Data and Application Security and Privacy (pp. 269–280). https://doi.org/10.1145/3029806.3029832
Toh, W. (2022, July). Building STIG-compliant AMIs for Amazon EKS. AWS Containers Blog. https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/containers/building-stig-compliant-amis-for-amazon-eks/
Zhou, W., Ning, P., Zhang, X., Ammons, G., Wang, R., & Bala, V. (2010). Always up-to-date: Scalable offline patching of VM images in a compute cloud. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual Computer Security Applications Conference (pp. 377–386). https://doi.org/10.1145/1920261.1920317
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Pavankumar Koneru, Sai Kumar Pola

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.