Achieving a pro-poor local government budget process in Dokolo district, Uganda: The role of civil society organizations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47941/ajss.1179Keywords:
Civil society organizations, pro-poor budget processes, local government, DokoloAbstract
Purpose: This study aimed to analyze the role of civil society organizations in pro-poor local government budget processes, with Dokolo District as a case study. The specific objectives of the study are (i) To examine the extent to which CSOs contribute to local government revenue enhancement; (ii) To examine the extent to which CSOs influence the enactment of pro-poor local government budget allocations/priorities (iii) To examine the extent to which CSOs promote pro-poor implementation of enacted local government budgets; and (iv) To examine the extent to which CSOs prevent leakages to local government budget resources.
Methods and materials: The study adopted a descriptive and correlational design, employing both quantitative and qualitative approaches. The population of the study included officials of 10 civil society organizations and both technical and political leaders of 6 local governments in Dokolo district. The sample size of the study was 89 respondents determined using Krejcie and Morgan Table (Krejcie and Morgan, 1970). The target respondents included both males and females.
Findings of the study: The findings of this study suggest that civil society organizations contribute to local government revenue enhancement, building the capacity of local governments in revenue mobilization, providing off-budget and on-budget support to local governments; that civil society organizations promote pro-poor local government budget allocations through forums such as budget conferences and budget dialogues; that civil society organizations influence local governments to implement their budgets in ways that serve the best interests of the poor and/or the underprivileged and/or their priorities; by pressurizing local governments to implement pro-poor priorities that local governments would otherwise not implement and by speeding up or reducing delay in the implementation of pro-poor priorities or projects; and that civil society organizations promote pro-poor local government budgets by preventing leakages to pro-poor local government resources by among others checking shoddy work in pro-poor projects, Public Expenditure Tracking Surveys (PETS) to check loss of funds meant for pro-poor projects.
Conclusion: Civil society organisations remain in the pro-poor budgeting processes at both the central government level as well as the local government level in Uganda.
Recommendations: From the findings, it is encouraged that local governments should leverage civil society organizations as an important resource in enhancing their revenue; that local governments should involve civil society organizations in all phases of the budget circle; that local governments should embrace the use of social accountability forums and tools such as barazas, Public Expenditure Tracking Surveys (PETS) and social movements for checking local government budget resource leakages to enhance decentralized service delivery. Based on what remains unknown, this study suggests future research on the role of social accountability in fighting poverty.
Downloads
References
Action aid, Oxfam, save the Children, Global campaign for Education (2012). Civil Society Engagement in Education Budgets: A report documenting Commonwealth Education Fund Experience. CEF
Andrews, M., Cangiano, M., Cole, N.,de Renzio, P., Krause, P., and Seligmann, R. (2014). “This is PFM.” No.285. Harvard: Centre for International Development at Harvard University.
Akyel, R. and Kose, O. (2013). “Auditing and governance: Importance of citizen participation and the role of Supreme Audit Institutions to enhance democratic governance.” Journal of Yasar University 8 (32): 5495-5514.
Antwi-Boasiako, J and Krumah, G. (2018). The role of civil society organizations in the public financial management of Ghana. Legon: University of Ghana.
Bratton, M. (1994). Civil Society and Political Transition in Africa. Institute of Development Research Reports Vol. 11, No. 6 1994.
Cammack, T., Fowler, M. and Phomdouagsy, C.D. (2008). Lao PDR Public Expenditure Study: Public Expenditure for Pro-Poor Agricultural Growth. Draft Paper, DFID/World Bank Partnership on Public expenditure in Agriculture, Washing DC.
Carlitz, R. (2013). “Improving Transparency and Accountability in the Budget process: An Assessment of Recent Initiatives.” Development Policy Review 31(SI), s49-s67.
Cheema, A.G., and Rondinelli, D.A (1983) Decentralization and Development: Policy Implementation in Developing Countries. London: Sage Publishers.
Curristine, T., Lonti, Z. and Joumar, D.1. (2007). Improving Public Sector Efficiency: Challenges and Opportunities. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 7(1): 1608-7143.
Department of Economic and Social Affairs, United Nations (2005). Citizen participation and Pro-Poor Budgeting. New York: DESA.
Development Initiatives, is the 2019/20 Uganda budget pro-poor?: pro-poor analysis of FY 2019/20 budget report. Briefing Paper July 2019.
Development Initiatives, Pro-poor orientation of budgets: The case of Uganda. Briefing Paper July 2016.
De Renzio, P. (2006). Aid, Budgets and Accountability: CAPE Workshop 2005 – Summary Paper. The Overseas Development Institute. Accessed on 26th October 2021 from https://www.researchegate.net/publication/267852066
European Commission (2014) Promoting Civil Society participation in policy and budget processes. Luxemburg: European Commission.
European Union (2019). Commission Decision on the financing of the Annual Action Programme 2019 in favor of the Republic of Uganda: Action Document for “Fiscal decentralization and service delivery” Kampala: European Union.
Foster, M., Fozzard, A., Naschold, F., and Conway, T. (2002). How, when and why does Poverty get Budget Priority: Poverty Reduction Strategy and Public Expenditure in Five African Countries, Synthesis Paper. London: Overseas Development Institute.
Government of Uganda, Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic Development, “realizing the Development Potential of NGOs in Uganda” Report of Workshop Kampala, 9-10 February 1994.
Hayes, M.T.(2013). Incrementalism, in Encyclopedia Britannica, viewed on 26th October, 2021, from http://www.britannica.com/contributor/Michael-T-Hayes/9346359.
Hedger, E., Williamson, T., Muzoora, T., and Stroh, J. (2010). Sector Budget Support in Practice Case Study Education Sector in Uganda. London: Overseas Development Institute and Mokoro.
Hughes, A. and Atampurgre, N (2005). ;A Critical look at civil societies’ poverty reduction monitoring and evaluation experiences’ participatory Learning and Action51: Civil Society and poverty reduction. London: International Institute for Environment and Development.
Hughes, A. (2002). ‘Lessons Learnt on Civil Society Engagement in PRSP Processed in Bolivia, Kenya and Uganda: A report emerging from the Bolivian-East African Sharing and Learning Exchange’, Report for the participation Group. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies.
Jezard, A. (2018). Who and what is ‘civil society’? World Economic Forum Agenda article, 23 April 2018, accessed on 13/10/2021 from: http:///www.weforum.org/agenda/2018/04/what-is-civil-society.
Kansiime, N.K. (2019). The state, Civil Society and Democracy in Uganda. American Research Journal of Humanities and Social Science, Vol. 02, Issue 08, pp-01-07.
Khan, M. (1998). “The role of civil society and patron-client networks in the analysis of corruption”. OECD/UNDP (Ed.) Corruption and Integrity Improvement Initiatives in developing Countries. New York: UNDP.
Khan, M. A. (2006). “Engaged Governance”: A Pathway to Citizen Engagement for Social Justice (Paper in Progress). New York: UNDESA.
Kleibl, T., and Munck, R. (2017). Civil Society in Mozambique: NGOs, religion, politics and witchcraft, Third World Quarterly, 38:1, 203-218, DOI:10.1080/01436597.2016.1217738.
Kocka, J. (2004). European Review, Vol. 12, No. 1, 65-79.
Krafchik, W. (2004). “Can civil society add value to budget decision-making?’ Citizen Participation and Pro-Poor Budgeting. New York: United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs.
Lawson, A. (2015). “Public Financial Management.” GSDRC Professional Development Reading Pack No. 6
Lindblom, C.E. (1959). The science of mudding through, Public Administration Review 19(2): 79-88. http://doi.org/10.2307/973677.
Mandani, M. and Onyango, O.J. (1994) Uganda Studies in Living Conditions and Popular Movement and Constitutionalism. Kampala: JEP and Centre for Basic Research.
Marquetti, A., Carlos, E., Schonerwald, D.S and Campbell, A. I. (2012). “Participatory economic democracy in action: Participatory budgeting in Porto Alegre, 1989-2004.” Review of Radical Political Economics 44(1): 62-81.
McLean, I., and McMillan, A. (2003). The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic Development (2009). A guide to the Budget Process. Kampala: MoFPED.
Mitlin, D. and Mogaladi, J. (2009). ‘Social Movements and Poverty Reduction in South Africa’. SED research paper. Accessed 23 March 2021. http://www.sed.manchester.ac.uk/research/socialmovements/publications/reports/Mitlin MogalidiSouthAfricamappinganalysis.pdf.
Mitlin, D. and Satterthwaite, D. (2004a) ‘Introduction’ in D. Mitlin and D. Satterthwaite (Eds.) Empowering Squatter Citizen: Local Government, Civil Society and Urban Poverty Reduction. London: Earth scan.
Mitlin, D. and Satterthwaite, D. (2004a) ‘The Role of Local and Extra-Local Organizations’ in D. Mitlin and D. Satterthwaite (Eds) Empowering Squatter Citizen: Local Government, Civil Society and Urban Poverty Reduction. London: Earthscan.
Mugenda, O.M and Mugende, A.G. (20003). Research methods: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches. Nairobi: Act Press.
National Planning Authority, Republic of Uganda (2015) National Development Plan 2015/16 – 2019/20.
O’Driscoll, D. (2018). Civil Society in Authoritarian Regimes. K4D Helpdesk Report. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies.
Orodho, J. A. (2005). Elements of Education and Social Sciences. Research Methods. Nairobi: Masola Publishers.
Oxfam, Tax Justice Network Africa, Make Tax Fair, DGAP, Seatini, EU (2012) Basic Insights on Taxation: Training Module One. Kampala: Seatini.
Rahman, S. (2006) ‘Development, Democracy and the NGO Sector: Theory and Evidence from Bangldesh’, Journal of Developing Societies, 22(4): 451-473).
Ramkumar, V. and P. de Renzio (2009), Improving Budget Transparency and Accountability in Aid Dependent Countries: How Can Donors Help? IBP Budget Brief No. 7, International Budget partnership, Washington DC.
Rubin, I, S. (1990). Budget theory and Budget practice. How good the fit?, Public Administration Review 50(2), 179.
Salamon, Lester M., Wojciech, S., AND Helmut, K. A., (2000). “Social origins of civil society: An overview.” Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins Center for Civil Society Studies.
Salamon, M.L., Sokolowski, S.W. and Associates (2004) Global Civil Society. Dimensions of the Nonprofit Sector. Bloomfield: Kumarian Press, Inc.
Schick, A. (2001). Can national Legislatures Regain an Effective Voice in Budgetary Policy? Paper Presented to the Conference on Holding the Executive Accountable: The Changing Role of Parliament in the Budget process. Paris, 24-25 January 2001.
Shah, A. (2007). Public Sector Governance and Accountability Series: Participatory Budget. Washington D.C.: World Bank.
Talukdar, MRI (2020) Examining the implication of classical budget theories in the local government budgeting process: Union councils in Bangladesh, Journal of Local Government Research and Innovation 1(0).
UNDESA (2005). Participatory Planning and Budgeting at the Sub-national Level. New York: United Nations.
UNDP (2004). Civil society Organizations and participatory Programme (CSOPP). Accessed 15 March 2021. http://www.undp.org/csopp/CSO/NewFiles/faqs.htm.
UN-Habitat (2015). The challenge of Local Government Financing in Developing Countries. Nairobi; UN-HABITAT.
VanDyck, C.K. (2017). Concept and definition of civil society sustainability. Washington DC. Centre for Strategic and International Studies. Accessed on 14/10/2021 from http://csis-prod.s3.amazonawa.com/s3fs-Public/publication/170630VanDyckCivilSocietrySustaninabilityweb.pdf?QfxMleHr9U8aeVIkOjFo.FBTsLG76HPX
Van Lerberghe, W. and Ferrinho, P. (2002). Civil Society Organizations and the Poor: The Unfulfilled Expectations. Antwert: Institute for Tropical Medicine.
Wampler, B. (2007). A Guide to Participatory Budgeting. Paper presented at the third conference of the International Budget Project, Mumbai, November 4-9 Accessed 23 March, 2021.http://www.internationalbudge.org/cdrom/papers/syst,s/ParticipatoryBudgets/Wampler.pdf
Willmore, L. (2004). Civil Society Organizations, Participation and Budgeting. UNDESA. Accessed 15 March 2021. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/53475/
World Bank (2000). Working Together: The World Bank’s Partnership with Civil Society. Washington DC. World Bank.
World Bank. (2002). “Voices and Choices at a Macro Level: Participation in Country-owned Poverty Reduction Strategies, a Workshop Report.” Shah, P., & Youssef, D. (Eds). Action Learning Dissemination Series No.1. World Bank.
World Bank (2012). Citizens and service delivery: Assessing the use of Social accountability approaches in the human development sectors. Washington DC. World Bank.
World Bank. (2013). Global Stock-Take of Social Accountability Initiatives for Budget transparency and Monitoring. Key Challenges and Lessons Learned. Washington D.C.: World Bank.
Yin, R.K. (2003). Case Study Research: Design and Methods (3rdEd.). Thousand Oaks.
Yin, R.K. (2003). Case Study Research: Design and Methods (4thEd.). SAGE Publications, Inc.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Okello Godfrey Ogwang, Gilbert Obici, David Mwesigwa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
