Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

RISK MITIGATION STRATEGIES AND PERFORMANCE OF INSURANCE INDUSTRY IN KENYA: A CASE OF MOTOR INSURANCE COMPANIES

Janet Makokha Okumu, Dr Jane Wanjira

Abstract


Purpose: The study’s general objective was to establish the effects of risk mitigation strategies on performance of insurance industry in Kenya: a case of motor insurance companies. Specifically, the Project focused on the Risk control, risk avoidance, risk transfer and product mix strategies on performance of the insurance industry

Methodology: The research used descriptive survey research designs. The target population of this study was the management and the other employees of all the 18 Motor insurance companies, the sample size of the study was 54.The sampling procedure was both simple random sampling and purposive sampling. Primary data entailed using of questionnaires. Content validity was ensured by asking questions that are relevant and captured the research objectives, reliability was measured with the help of Cronbach’s alpha (α). Descriptive statistics such as means, standard deviation and frequency distribution tables were used to analyze the data. Qualitative data was analyzed using content analysis to generate qualitative reports which were presented in a continuous prose. Inferential statistics such as regression and correlation analysis were used to establish the effects of risk mitigation strategies on performance of insurance industry in Kenya, a case of motor insurance companies.  Data presentation was done by the use of bar charts and graphs, percentages and frequency tables for ease of understanding and interpretation.

Results: The study found out that risk control strategy and performance of regulated motor insurance companies in Kenya are positively and significantly related. The results further indicate that risk avoidance strategy and the performance of regulated motor insurance companies were positively and significantly related.  It was further established that product mix strategy and performance of regulated motor insurance companies were positively and significantly related while risk based audit strategy and performance of regulated motor insurance companies were also positively and significantly related

Conclusion: The study concluded that risk controlling strategy, risk avoidance strategy, risk based audit strategy and product mix Strategy have a positive and significant effect on performance of Motor Insurance Companies. Based on the findings and conclusions that risk controlling, risk avoidance Strategy, risk based audit strategy and product mix strategy has a positive and significant effect on performance of Motor Insurance Companies.

 Recommendation: the study recommended that motor insurance companies should work toward investing more on risk reduction strategies in order to improve their performance.



This Abstract was viewed 224 times | PDF Article downloaded 98 times

Keywords


Risk control strategy, Risk avoidance strategy, Product mix strategy, Risk based audit strategy, Performance and Insurance

Full Text:

PDF

References


AKI (2014). The Association of Kenya Insurance. Insurance Industry Annual Report. Nairobi: Sentrim.

AKI (2010). The Association of Kenya Insurance. Insurance Industry Annual Report. Nairobi: Sentrim.

Allan, N., & Beer, L. (2006). Strategic Risk: It’s All in Your Head. Working Paper Series. Bath: University of Bath, School of Management Publishers.

Andersen, K., &Terp, A. (2006). Risk Management. In T.J. Andersen (Ed.), Nairobi: University of Nairobi Press.

Ali Fatemi & Martin Glaum (2000) Risk management practices of German firms. Managerial Finance ,Vol 26(3),1-17.

Ellul, A. &Yerramilli, V. (2010). Stronger Risk, Lower Controls: Evidence from U.S. Bank Holding Companies, National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 16178.

Ernst & Young (2012). Turning Risk into Results: How Leading Companies Use Risk Management to Fuel Better Performance.

Finlay, P.N. (2000). Strategic Management: An introduction to business and corporate strategy. Brussels: Prentice Hall.

GOK. (2010). Development and Employment in Kenya. Sessional Paper No. 4.Nairobi: Government Printer.

Henriksen, P., & Uhlenfeldt, T. (2006). Contemporary Enterprise-Wide Risk Management Frameworks: A Comparative Analysis. In T.J. Andersen (Ed.), Perspectives on Strategic Risk Management (pp. 107-129).

Johnson, G., & Scholes, K. (2002). Exploring Corporate Strategy: Text and cases (6th ed.). Prentice Hall.

Richard Hall (1992). The strategic analysis of intangible resources, Strategic Management Journal, Vol 13(2),135-144.

KPMG. (2006). Enterprise Risk Management in the United States: A 2006 Report Card.

Magezi, J.K. (2003). A New Framework for Measuring the Credit Risk of a Controlling. Institute for Monetary and Economic Studies (IMES), 1-45.

Meredith, L. (2004). The Ultimate Risk Manager. Boston: CUSP Communications Group Inc.

David Mayers & Clifford W. Smith, Jr.(1987). Corporate Insurance and the Underinvestment Problem, The Journal of Risk and Insurance, Vol 54 (1), 45-54

Merton, R.C. (1995). A Functional Perspective of Financial Intermediation, Financial Management Journal, 24 (2), 23-41.

Merton, R.C. (2005). A Functional Perspective of Financial Intermediation, Financial Management Journal, 24 (2), 23-41.

Mikes A. & R.S Kaplan. (2014).Towards a contingency. Theory of Enterprise Risk Management. Working Paper 13-63.

Miller, K.D. (2007). A Framework for Integrated Risk Management in International n Business. Journal of International Business Studies, 23(2), 311-331.

Monira, J.(2009). on Strategic Risk Management Copenhagen: Business School Press.

Power, M. (2004). The Risk Management of Everything: Rethinking the Politics of Uncertainty, Demos, and London.

Quach, M. (2005). Problems in Managing Internal Development Projects in Multi-Project Environments, International Journal of Project Management, 21 (395-402)

Rejda, G. E. (2008). Principles of Risk Management and Insurance, Prentice Hall, 10th Ed.

Stulz, R.M. (2003). Risk Management and Derivatives. South-Western: Mason, Ohio.

Vaughan, E.J. & Vaughan, T.M. (2008). Fundamentals of Risk and Insurance, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 10 th Edition.

Vedpurishwar, A.V. (2001). A Strategic Approach to Enterprise Risk Management.London: Global CEO Press.

Momo.O.A and Ukpong.M.S.(2013).Corporate Governance and its effects on the Nigerian Insurance, European Journal of Globalization and Development Research Vol 8 No 1.

Linbo Fan and Sherril Shaffer.(2004) Efficiency versus risk in large domestic US banks; Managerial Finance ,Vol 30 No 9.

Venette, S. J. (2003). Risk Communication in a High Reliability Organization: APHIS PPQ's Inclusion of Risk in Decision Making. Ann Arbor, MI: UMI Proquest Information and Learning.

Timothy.W.Ruefli, James.M.Collins & Joseph.R.Lacugna (1999).Measures in Strategic Management research,Vol 20,issue 2.

Fite.D. and P.Pfeiderer (1995). “Should firms use derivatives to manage risk? In:Beaver.W. and G.Parker(eds) Risk management: Problems and solutions Mc Graw-Hill, New York,NY,139-169.

Wanjohi, A. & Mugure, A. (2008). Factors affecting the growth of MSEs in rural areas of Kenya: A case of ICT firms in Kiserian Township, Kajiado District of Kenya. Unpublished.

Ward, S. and Chapman, C. (2003), Transforming project risk management into project uncertainty management. International Journal of Management, Vol. 21(2),

Zwikael, O. and Ahn, M. (2011), The effectiveness of risk management: An analysis of risk planning across enterprise industries and countries. Journal for Risk analysis, Vol. 31 (1), 25-37

Thomas R. Eisenmann (2002) ,The effects of CEO equity ownership and firm diversification on risk taking .Strategic Management Journal, Vol 23(6), 513-534.

John.J.Y.Seo (2001) Demand Diversification under uncertainty and Market Power, Vol 15, issue 4.

Antony Carey (2001) “Effective Risk Management in financial institutions: the turn bull approach”, Balance Sheet, Vol 9, issue


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Paper submission email: info@carijournals.org

This journal follows ISO 9001 management standard and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Copyright © www.carijournals.org