Boundaries and Ethics of Borrowing from Different Cultures in Central European Countries

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to debate the boundaries and ethics of borrowing from different cultures in central European countries.

Methodology: The study adopted a desktop research methodology. Desk research refers to secondary data or that which can be collected without fieldwork. Desk research is basically involved in collecting data from existing resources hence it is often considered a low-cost technique as compared to field research, as the main cost is involved in executive's time, telephone charges and directories. Thus, the study relied on already published studies, reports and statistics. This secondary data was easily accessed through the online journals and library.

Findings: The findings revealed that there exists a contextual and methodological gap relating to the boundaries and ethics of borrowing from different cultures in central European countries. Preliminary empirical review revealed that cultural borrowing in the fashion industry often raises concerns of cultural misappropriation, lack of recognition and compensation for the original cultures, and perpetuation of power imbalances. It emphasized the need for informed cultural exchange and collaboration. It is crucial to establish guidelines and policies that provide clear frameworks for ethical borrowing practices across various domains such as fashion, music, culinary arts, and visual arts.

Recommendations: The Cultural Appropriation Theory, Postcolonial Theory and Intercultural Communication Theory may be used to anchor future studies on boundaries and ethics of borrowing from different cultures in central European countries. Open dialogue should be encouraged, equal partnerships and meaningful collaborations between cultures is also essential. Also, legal frameworks should be developed to protect traditional knowledge, cultural heritage, and the rights of cultural communities.