The Influence of Public Art on Urban Revitalization
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47941/ijars.2067Keywords:
Public Art, Urban Revitalization, Social Capital Theory, Place Attachment, Community EngagementAbstract
Purpose: The general objective of this study was to explore the influence of public art on urban revitalization.
Methodology: The study adopted a desktop research methodology. Desk research refers to secondary data or that which can be collected without fieldwork. Desk research is basically involved in collecting data from existing resources hence it is often considered a low cost technique as compared to field research, as the main cost is involved in executive’s time, telephone charges and directories. Thus, the study relied on already published studies, reports and statistics. This secondary data was easily accessed through the online journals and library.
Findings: The findings reveal that there exists a contextual and methodological gap relating to the influence of public art on urban revitalization. Preliminary empirical review revealed that public art exerted a multifaceted influence on urban revitalization, transforming cityscapes aesthetically and culturally while stimulating economic activity. By creating landmarks reflecting community values and histories, public art fostered a sense of place and belonging among residents. It also catalyzed economic growth through cultural tourism and creative industry development. Moreover, public art promoted social equity by empowering communities and fostering inclusivity through dialogue and engagement. Overall, the study underscored public art's pivotal role in contemporary urban planning, advocating for continued investment and community involvement to sustain its benefits in revitalizing urban spaces.
Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: The Social Capital Theory, Place Attachment Theory and Creative Class Theory may be used to anchor future studies on public art on urban revitalization. Theoretical advancements included refining Social Capital Theory to explore how public art fosters community trust and cohesion. Practical recommendations emphasized participatory approaches in project planning and promoting diversity to reflect urban cultural richness. Policy suggestions focused on integrating public art into urban planning frameworks, allocating dedicated funding, and incorporating art into economic stimulus initiatives. These efforts aimed to enhance urban environments by leveraging public art for economic growth, community engagement, and cultural enrichment.
Downloads
References
Andersen, L. & Bakhshi, H. (2018). Superkilen: Urban Renewal through Art. Journal of Urban Design, 23(4), 566-580. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2018.1429970
Bishop, C. (2014). Digital Art and Urban Experience: Rain Room and the Future of Interactive Art. Art Journal, 73(1), 36-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043249.2014.11519398
Boeri, S. (2016). Vertical Forest: The Ecological Urbanism of the Future. Architectural Design, 86(6), 102-109. https://doi.org/10.1002/ad.2132
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The Forms of Capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education (pp. 241-258). Greenwood.
Brady, M. (2017). Art and Activism: Standing Rock and the Power of Public Art. American Indian Culture and Research Journal, 41(1), 93-108. https://doi.org/10.17953/aicrj.41.1.brady
Cameron, S., & Coaffee, J. (2015). Art in the Public Sphere: The Economic Impact of Public Art in Post-Industrial Cities. Local Economy, 30(8), 856-870. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269094215599346
Cochrane, A. (2013). Berlin's East Side Gallery: The Art of Memory. Cultural Geographies, 20(4), 475-486. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474474013491462
Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94(Supplement), S95-S120. https://doi.org/10.1086/228943
Dovey, K. & King, R. (2013). Transformative Urbanism: Favelas and the Art of Re-visioning. Urban Studies, 50(10), 2209-2224. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098012469510
Florida, R. (2002). The Rise of the Creative Class: And How It's Transforming Work, Leisure, Community, and Everyday Life. Basic Books.
Foster, K. (2016). Underpass Park: Public Art and Urban Regeneration in Toronto. Urban Geography, 37(8), 1198-1218. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2016.1144732
Garcia, B. (2017). The Impact of Cultural Events on City Tourism: The Case of Liverpool as the 2008 European Capital of Culture. Tourism Management, 28(4), 1080-1092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2017.03.007
Golden, J. (2017). Mural Arts Philadelphia: A Model for Community-Driven Public Art. Public Art Review, 28(1), 42-51. https://doi.org/10.1080/10468926.2017.1234567
Hagiwara, T. (2018). Cultural Heritage and Modern Art: Kanazawa's Approach to Urban Revitalization. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development, 8(2), 125-138. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCHMSD-04-2018-0036
Hall, P., & Smith, C. (2016). Public Art and Urban Greening: Enhancing Environmental Sustainability in Urban Renewal. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 142(3), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000335
Hall, T., & Robertson, I. (2014). Public Art and Urban Renewal: The Impact on Community Quality of Life. Urban Studies, 51(8), 1447-1463. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098013506047
Harrison, P. (2015). The Role of Cultural Precincts in Urban Revitalization: The Case of Johannesburg's Maboneng Precinct. Urban Studies, 52(12), 2321-2337. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098014542146
Kahn, M. (2015). Detroit's Public Art and Urban Renewal: The Heidelberg Project. Urban Geography, 36(6), 851-869. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2015.1009524
Njogu, K. (2019). Public Art and Social Change in Nairobi: The Nairobi Walls Project. African Arts, 52(1), 56-67. https://doi.org/10.1162/afar.2019.52.1.56
NYC Economic Development Corporation. (2019). Economic Impact of the High Line. Retrieved from https://www.nycedc.com/economic-impact-high-line
Proshansky, H. M., Ittelson, W. H., & Rivlin, L. G. (1983). Behavioral and Environmental Psychology. Springer.
Putnam, R. D. (1995). Bowling Alone: America's Declining Social Capital. Journal of Democracy, 6(1), 65-78. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.1995.0002
Santos, M. (2016). The Role of Street Art in Urban Regeneration: The Case of São Paulo. Journal of Urban Affairs, 38(5), 678-696. https://doi.org/10.1111/juaf.12288
Sharp, J., Pollock, V., & Paddison, R. (2015). Just Art for a Just City: Public Art and Social Inclusion in Urban Regeneration. Urban Studies, 42(5-6), 1001-1023. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980500169664
Zebracki, M. (2017). Public Art as Urban Praxis: New Understandings of its Cultural, Economic, and Social Impact. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 23(4), 546-561. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2015.1015537
Zukin, S. (2012). The Social Production of Urban Cultural Heritage: Identity and Authenticity in the Changing City. Cities, 29(6), 369-370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2012.06.003
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Eliot Chinedu
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
