The Role of Public Art in Community Identity and Urban Development
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47941/ijars.2068Keywords:
Public Art, Community Identity, Urban Development, Social Capital, Place AttachmentAbstract
Purpose: This study sought to investigate the role of public art in community identity and urban development.
Methodology: The study adopted a desktop research methodology. Desk research refers to secondary data or that which can be collected without fieldwork. Desk research is basically involved in collecting data from existing resources hence it is often considered a low cost technique as compared to field research, as the main cost is involved in executive’s time, telephone charges and directories. Thus, the study relied on already published studies, reports and statistics. This secondary data was easily accessed through the online journals and library.
Findings: The findings reveal that there exists a contextual and methodological gap relating to the role of public art in community identity and urban development. Preliminary empirical review revealed that public art significantly enhances community identity and urban development by reflecting cultural and historical narratives, fostering social cohesion, and encouraging civic engagement. It demonstrated that public art can transform urban spaces into vibrant, interactive environments, thereby boosting local economies and promoting sustainable urban growth. The study emphasized the importance of inclusive and participatory approaches in planning public art projects to ensure they reflect and serve their communities effectively, and it called for long-term strategies to sustain the benefits of public art in urban development.
Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: The Social Capital Theory, Place Attachment Theory and Cultural Theory of Urban Design may be used to anchor future studies on the role of public art in community identity and urban development. The study highlighted significant theoretical, practical, and policy contributions. It emphasized the role of public art in fostering social capital and place attachment, advocated for its inclusion in urban planning as a strategic tool for social cohesion and economic revitalization, and recommended inclusive, participatory approaches to ensure community engagement. The study also stressed the importance of policies for the sustainability and maintenance of public artworks and suggested that integrating public art into urban development strategies could bridge cultural and economic goals, creating vibrant and inclusive urban environments.
Downloads
References
Americans for the Arts. (2015). The role of the arts in building a community. Americans for the Arts. Retrieved from https://www.americansforthearts.org
Baker, S. (2015). Banksy's impact on urban art: A socio-political commentary. Journal of Urban Art Studies, 10(2), 23-45. https://doi.org/10.1080/2030320128.2015.0890021
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J.G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education (pp. 241-258). Greenwood.
Broudehoux, A. (2017). Iconic architecture and urban regeneration: The case of Cloud Gate in Chicago. Urban Studies, 54(8), 1861-1878. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098016630507
Chang, C. (2016). Interactive public art and community engagement: The "Before I Die" project. Community Development Journal, 51(3), 379-394. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsv043
Coombes, A. (2014). Commemorating the past: The role of public art in post-apartheid South Africa. African Arts Journal, 47(3), 34-49. https://doi.org/10.1215/12324263-2718994
Freeman, J. (2018). Art and urban revitalization in the favelas of Rio de Janeiro. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 42(4), 645-661. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijur.12457
Gaztambide-Fernández, R. (2017). Art for equity: The impact of the Chicago Mural Movement on African American communities. Urban Education Journal, 52(1), 69-94. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085915623333
Golden, J. (2017). The Philadelphia Mural Arts Program: Building community through art. Art Education, 70(1), 6-11. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2017.1247578
Gonçalves, A. (2016). Favela Painting: The role of art in community development. Journal of Latin American Cultural Studies, 25(3), 267-283. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569325.2016.1207259
Kawashima, N. (2016). The economic impact of cultural tourism in Japan: The case of the Echigo-Tsumari Art Field. Tourism Economics, 22(2), 301-315. https://doi.org/10.5367/te.2014.0453
Kong, L. (2016). Art and nature in the city: Green public art and urban sustainability in Singapore. Geoforum, 76, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.08.004
Lang, J. (1987). Creating Architectural Theory: The Role of the Behavioral Sciences in Environmental Design. Van Nostrand Reinhold.
Loughran, K. (2014). Parks for profit: The High Line, growth machines, and the uneven development of urban public spaces. City & Community, 13(1), 49-68. https://doi.org/10.1111/cico.12050
Proshansky, H.M., Ittelson, W.H., & Rivlin, L.G. (1983). Behavioral and Environmental Psychology: An Introduction. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Putnam, R.D. (1995). Bowling alone: America's declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6(1), 65-78. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.1995.0002
Richards, G. (2018). Cultural tourism: A review of recent research and trends. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 36, 12-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2018.03.001
Sharp, J., Pollock, V., & Paddison, R. (2014). Just art for a just city: Public art and social inclusion in urban regeneration. Urban Studies, 42(5-6), 559-574. https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098042000183231
Smith, N. (2018). Regenerating London: Gentrification and community in the Docklands. Urban Studies Journal, 55(5), 1013-1032. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098017706119
Thompson, N. (2017). Art and regional revitalization: The Setouchi Triennale as a model for rural renewal. Journal of Cultural Policy Studies, 12(3), 245-262. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2016.1149573
Waithaka, M. (2019). The GoDown Arts Centre: A hub for creativity and urban development in Nairobi. African Cultural Studies, 31(1), 83-97. https://doi.org/10.1080/13696815.2019.1580837
Zukin, S., & Braslow, L. (2011). The life cycle of New York's creative districts: Reflections on the unanticipated consequences of unplanned cultural zones. City, Culture and Society, 2(3), 131-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccs.2011.06.003
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Demtillah Gesare
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
