Artificial Intelligence in Digital Art: A Comparative Analysis on Impacts to Artists

Authors

  • Richard Christopher Jude C. Cajulis University of Santo Tomas, Manila, Philippines
  • Jakob Adrian O. Tuazon University of Santo Tomas, Manila, Philippines
  • Ronaldo R. Cabauatan University of Santo Tomas, Manila, Philippines; National Research Council of the Philippines

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47941/ijars.2444

Keywords:

Digital Artists, AI Users, AI’s Impact, AI Incorporation

Abstract

Purpose: This study explores the evolving relationship between artists and AI tools in the digital art world.  AI's ability to mimic artistic styles and generate new ideas challenges traditional notions of art creation. While AI offers potential benefits like workload reduction and creative inspiration, concerns remain about its impact on artist income and creative processes.

Methodology: The research investigates artist satisfaction with AI-generated works, the impact on workflow efficiency, and the potential for income changes. It aims to understand how artists perceive these tools and how AI is affecting their creative ecosystem.

Findings: The study anticipates that traditional and blended approaches will hold higher value due to the unique skills and time invested. Findings revealed a three-tiered artist landscape: 1) traditional artists, 2) artists who blend AI and traditional methods, and 3) artists solely using AI tools. The research sheds light on the complex interplay between technological innovation, creative expression, and financial viability within the digital art domain.

Unique Contribution to Theory, Policy and Practice: The study employs economic theory of production to analyze the impact of AI on artistic production. In the context revenue, satisfaction, and workload, artists in Manila, Philippines are willing to use AI tools in order to increase their revenue, have a felicitous satisfaction, and reduce their workload that align with the client’s needs. While AI tools can be valuable assistants, the human element remains central to the creative process.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Richard Christopher Jude C. Cajulis, University of Santo Tomas, Manila, Philippines

College of Commerce of Business Administration

Jakob Adrian O. Tuazon, University of Santo Tomas, Manila, Philippines

College of Commerce of Business Administration

Ronaldo R. Cabauatan, University of Santo Tomas, Manila, Philippines; National Research Council of the Philippines

College of Commerce of Business Administration, Research Center for Social Sciences and Education, The Graduate School, Social Sciences Division.

References

Baig, A. (2024, April 2). What is generative AI? McKinsey & Company. https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/mckinsey-explainers/what-is-generative-ai

Baradaran, A. (2023). Towards a decolonial I in AI: mapping the pervasive effects of artificial intelligence on the art ecosystem. AI & Society, 39(1), 7–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-023-01771-5

Bellaiche, L., Shahi, R., Turpin, M. H., Ragnhildstveit, A., Sprockett, S., Barr, N., Christensen, A. P., & Seli, P. (2023). Humans versus AI: whether and why we prefer human-created compared to AI-created artwork. Cognitive Research, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-023-00499-6

Bravic, L. (2023, November 23). A short history of digital art: between new technologies & innovative artistic practices. Artland Magazine. https://magazine.artland.com/digital-art/

Brown, A. (2023, October 5). Is artificial intelligence set to take over the art industry? Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/anniebrown/2021/09/06/is-artificial-intelligence-set-to-take-over-the-art-industry/?sh=65b1895c33c5

Cetinić, E., & She, J. (2022). Understanding and Creating Art with AI: Review and Outlook. ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications and Applications/ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing Communications and Applications, 18(2), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1145/3475799

Chatterjee, A. (2022). Art in an age of artificial intelligence. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1024449

Chiarella, S. G., Torromino, G., Gagliardi, D. M., Rossi, D., Babiloni, F., & Cartocci, G. (2022). Investigating the negative bias towards artificial intelligence: Effects of prior assignment of AI-authorship on the aesthetic appreciation of abstract paintings. Computers in Human Behavior, 137, 107406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107406

Chui, M., Manyika, J., & Miremadi, M. (2018a, January 11). What AI can and can’t do (yet) for your business. McKinsey & Company. https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/quantumblack/our-insights/what-ai-can-and-cant-do-yet-for-your-business#/

Chui, M., Manyika, J., & Miremadi, M. (2018b, January 11). What AI can and can’t do (yet) for your business. McKinsey & Company. https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/quantumblack/our-insights/what-ai-can-and-cant-do-yet-for-your-business#/

Coeckelbergh, M. (2016). Can machines create art? Philosophy & Technology, 30(3), 285–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-016-0231-5

Davey, B. (2023, December 4). AI-Generated Art: How can visual artists navigate this new frontier of creativity? Art Marketing News. https://artmarketingnews.com/ai-generated-art/#:~:text=Customization%20and%20Personalization,out%20new%20styles%20and%20options

Dorfman, R. (n.d.). Britannica money. https://www.britannica.com/money/theory-of-production

Ducru, P., Raiman, J., Lemos, R., Garner, C., He, G., Balcha, H., Souto, G., Branco, S., & Bottino, C. (2024, April 5). AI Royalties -- an IP framework to compensate artists & IP holders for AI-Generated content. arXiv.org. https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.11857

Epstein, Z., Levine, S., Rand, D., & Rahwan, I. (2020, September 25). Who gets credit for AI-Generated art? https://www.cell.com/iscience/pdf/S2589-0042(20)30707-0.pdf

Esmh. (2022a, September 5). A scientist’s opinion: Interview with Alexander Peterhänsel about Art and AI. European Science-Media Hub. https://sciencemediahub.eu/2021/08/11/a-scientists-opinion-interview-with-alexander-peterhansel-about-art-and-ai/

Esmh. (2022c, November 21). Art-ificial or art-istic intelligence? European Science-Media Hub. https://sciencemediahub.eu/2021/08/11/artificial-or-artistic-intelligence/

Ethics Unwrapped. (2023, February 17). Veil of ignorance - ethics unwrapped. https://ethicsunwrapped.utexas.edu/glossary/veil-of-ignorance

Fortino, A. (2023, November 2). Embracing Creativity: How AI Can Enhance the Creative process. sps.nyu.edu. https://www.sps.nyu.edu/homepage/emerging-technologies-collaborative/blog/2023/embracing-creativity-how-ai-can-enhance-the-creative-process.html#:~:text=Visual%20Exploration%3A%20For%20visual%20artists,starting%20points%20for%20new%20creations

Fortuna, P., & Modliński, A. (2021). A(I)rtist or Counterfeiter? Artificial Intelligence as (D)Evaluating Factor on the Art Market. the Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society/the Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society, 51(3), 188–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/10632921.2021.1887032

Garcia, R., Herrity, J., Gafner J, Eads, A., Mendoza, A., Lagace, L., (2023, January 27). 10 Pros and Cons of Being a Digital Artist (Plus Definition). https://www.indeed.com/career-advice/finding-a-job/pros-and-cons-of-being-digital-artist

Grba, D. (2022). Deep else: a critical framework for AI art. Digital, 2(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.3390/digital2010001

Guerreiro, R. (2022, May 4). Using Artificial intelligence to create paintings : How type of artist impacts WTP through emotional intelligence and perceived quality. https://www.proquest.com/openview/183eae03477e01b6a603b61f1ec9f3b1/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=2026366&diss=y

Gupta, A., Dovgan, D., Sood, S., Sinha, S., Mahanty, G., & Khoury, N. (n.d.). ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI) BASED METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR MAXIMIZING CREDIT CARD REVENUE. Technical Disclosure Commons. https://www.tdcommons.org/dpubs_series/4534

Hertzmann, A. (2018). Can computers create art? Arts, 7(2), 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/arts7020018

Hong, J., & Curran, N. M. (2019). Artificial intelligence, artists, and art. ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications and Applications/ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing Communications and Applications, 15(2s), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3326337

Horton, C. B., Jr, White, M. W., & Iyengar, S. S. (2023). Bias against AI art can enhance perceptions of human creativity. Scientific Reports, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-45202-3

Hurst, W., Spyrou, O., Tekinerdogan, B., & Krampe, C. (2023). Digital Art and the Metaverse: Benefits and challenges. Future Internet, 15(6), 188. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi15060188

Jiang, H., Brown, L. T., Cheng, J., Khan, M., Gupta, A., Workman, D., Hanna, A., Flowers, J., & Gebru, T. (2023). AI Art and its Impact on Artists. AIES ’23: Proceedings of the 2023 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI. https://doi.org/10.1145/3600211.3604681

Johnston, H., & Thue, D. (2024). Understanding Visual Artists’ Values and Attitudes towards Collaboration, Technology, and AI. Graphics Interface, 89, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1145/3670947.3670973

Kinsella, E. (2021, April 14). The first AI-Generated portrait ever sold at auction shatters expectations, fetching $432,500—43 times its estimate. Artnet News. https://news.artnet.com/market/first-ever-artificial-intelligence-portrait-painting-sells-at-christies-1379902

Köbis, N., & Mossink, L. (2020). Artificial Intelligence versus Maya Angelou: Experimental evidence that people cannot differentiate AI-generated from human-written poetry. arXiv (Cornell University). https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2005.09980

Kwon, O. (2020, February). An Empirical study on the Psychological Improvement Effects and satisfaction of Korean Traditional Painting Generative AI. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/379143027_An_Empirical_Study_on_the_Psychological_Improvement_Effects_and_Satisfaction_of_Korean_Traditional_Painting_Generative_AI

Lamarre, E., Singla, A., Sukharevsky, A., & Zemmel, R. (2024, March 4). A generative AI reset: Rewiring to turn potential into value in 2024. McKinsey & Company. https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/mckinsey-digital/our-insights/a-generative-ai-reset-rewiring-to-turn-potential-into-value-in-2024

Latikka, R., Bergdahl, J., Savela, N., & Oksanen, A. (2023a). AI as an Artist? A Two-Wave Survey Study on Attitudes Toward Using Artificial Intelligence in Art. Poetics, 101, 101839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2023.101839

Logan, S., & Daleo, C. (2024, February 14). AI art and the detrimental impacts on artists. Millennials in Motion Magazine. https://mimmag.com/ai-art-and-the-detrimental-impacts-on-artists/

Manovich, L. (2019, June). Defining AI Arts: Three proposals. http://manovich.net/content/04-projects/107-defining-ai-arts-three-proposals/manovich.defining-ai-arts.2019.pdf

Mazzone, M., & Elgammal, A. (2019a). Art, creativity, and the potential of artificial intelligence. Arts, 8(1), 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/arts8010026

Mikalonytė, E. S., & Kneer, M. (2022). Can Artificial Intelligence Make Art?: Folk Intuitions as to whether AI-driven Robots Can Be Viewed as Artists and Produce Art. ACM Transactions on Human-robot Interaction, 11(4), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1145/3530875

Mineo, L. (2024b, February 8). If it wasn’t created by a human artist, is it still art? Harvard Gazette. https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2023/08/is-art-generated-by-artificial-intelligence-real-art/

Moro-Visconti, R., Rambaud, S. C., & Pascual, J. L. (2023a). Artificial intelligence-driven scalability and its impact on the sustainability and valuation of traditional firms. Humanities & Social Sciences Communications, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02214-8

Nanou, E. (2023, July 6). The ethical pros and cons of AI art generation. MUO. https://www.makeuseof.com/ai-art-generation-ethical-pros-cons/

Nguyen, D. (2023). The effects of AI on digital artist. Theseus. https://www.theseus.fi/handle/10024/795505

Norbäck, P., & Persson, L. (2023). Why generative AI can make creative destruction more creative but less destructive. Small Business Economics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-023-00829-4

Nordström, P., Lundman, R., & Hautala, J. (2023). Evolving Coagency between Artists and AI in the Spatial Cocreative Process of Artmaking. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 113(9), 2203–2218. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2023.2210647

Parida, V., Sjödin, D., & Reim, W. (2019a). Reviewing literature on digitalization, business model innovation, and sustainable industry: past achievements and future promises. Sustainability, 11(2), 391. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11020391

Peukert, C. (2018a). The next wave of digital technological change and the cultural industries. Journal of Cultural Economics, 43(2), 189–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10824-018-9336-2

Ploin, A. (2022, March 3). Art for our sake: artists cannot be replaced by machines – study |. https://www.ox.ac.uk/news/2022-03-03-art-our-sake-artists-cannot-be-replaced-machines-study

Rahwan, I. (n.d.). How AI-generated art is changing the concept of art itself – MIT Media Lab. MIT Media Lab. https://www.media.mit.edu/articles/how-ai-generated-art-is-changing-the-concept-of-art-itself/

Raj, M., Berg, J. M., & Seamans, R. (2023). Art-Ificial intelligence: The Effect of AI disclosure on evaluations of creative content. Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4369818

Reim, W., Åström, J., & Eriksson, O. (2020a). Implementation of Artificial Intelligence (AI): A Roadmap for Business model innovation. AI, 1(2), 180–191. https://doi.org/10.3390/ai1020011

Rita Latikka, Bergdahl, J., Savela, N., & Oksanen, A. (2023, December). AI as an Artist? A Two-Wave survey study on attitudes toward using artificial intelligence in art. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304422X23000797

Rožman, M., Oreški, D., & Tominc, P. (2023). Artificial-Intelligence-Supported reduction of employees’ workload to increase the company’s performance in today’s VUCA environment. Sustainability, 15(6), 5019. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15065019

Schepman, A., & Rodway, P. (2022). The General Attitudes towards Artificial Intelligence Scale (GAAIS): Confirmatory Validation and Associations with Personality, Corporate Distrust, and General Trust. International Journal of Human-computer Interaction, 39(13), 2724–2741. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2085400

Shen, Y., & Yu, F. (2021, December). The influence of artificial intelligence on art design in the digital age. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/357363047_The_Influence_of_Artificial_Intelligence_on_Art_Design_in_the_Digital_Age

Sherman, A., & Morrissey, C. (2017). What is art good for? The Socio-Epistemic value of art. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00411

Sjödin, D., Parida, V., Palmié, M., & Wincent, J. (2021). How AI capabilities enable business model innovation: Scaling AI through co-evolutionary processes and feedback loops. Journal of Business Research, 134, 574–587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.05.009

Sturm, B. L., Iglesias, M., Ben-Tal, O., Miron, M., & Gómez, E. (2019). Artificial intelligence and Music: Open questions of copyright law and engineering Praxis. Arts, 8(3), 115. https://doi.org/10.3390/arts8030115

Teal. (n.d.). What is a Digital Artist? Explore the Digital Artist Career Path in 2024. https://www.tealhq.com/career-paths/digital-artist#:~:text=Definition%20of%20a%20Digital%20Artist&text=Digital%20artists%20blend%20classical%20art,entertainment%2C%20advertising%2C%20and%20multimedia.

Tin, T. T., Ling, L., Azam, A. I. B. A., & Palaniappan, R. (2022, January). Artificial intelligence Art: Attitudes and perceptions toward human versus artificial intelligence artworks. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/357876127_Artificial_Intelligence_Art_Attitudes_and_Perceptions_Toward_Human_Versus_Artificial_Intelligence_Artworks

Vargas, S. How AI-generated art is changing the concept of art itself – MIT Media Lab. MIT Media Lab. https://www.media.mit.edu/articles/how-ai-generated-art-is-changing-the-concept-of-art-itself/

Wood, J. (2022, October 16). The AI Art Revolution: What is the Future of Artists? Medium. https://medium.com/geekculture/the-ai-art-revolution-161631d6d85f

Wu, Y., Mou, Y., Li, Z., & Xu, K. (2020). Investigating American and Chinese Subjects’ explicit and implicit perceptions of AI-Generated artistic work. Computers in Human Behavior, 104, 106186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.106186

Xu, J., Zhang, X., Li, H., Yoo, C., & Pan, Y. (2023). Is everyone an artist? A study on User experience of AI-Based painting system. Applied Sciences, 13(11), 6496. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13116496

Yan, H. (2023). The analysis of tourist satisfaction integrating the artistic intelligence convolutional neural network and internet of things technology. IEEE Journals & Magazine | IEEE Xplore. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10255640

Zagrobelna, M. (2022, December 20). Why artists don’t like AI art. https://monikazagrobelna.com/2022/12/20/why-artists-dont-like-ai-art/

Zhang, S., & Li, S. (2024, October 19). “Confrontation or Acceptance”: Understanding Novice Visual Artists’ Perception towards AI-assisted Art Creation. arXiv.org. https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.14925

Downloads

Published

2025-01-10

How to Cite

Cajulis, R. C. J., Tuazon, J. A., & Cabauatan, R. R. (2025). Artificial Intelligence in Digital Art: A Comparative Analysis on Impacts to Artists. International Journal of Arts, Recreation and Sports, 4(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.47941/ijars.2444

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.