Software-Defined Networking (SDN) for Efficient Network Management
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47941/ijce.2056Keywords:
Software-Defined Networking (SDN), Efficient Network Management, Practical implementations, Stakeholder engagementAbstract
Purpose: The general objective of this study was to examine Software-Defined Networking (SDN) for efficient network management.
Methodology: The study adopted a desktop research methodology. Desk research refers to secondary data or that which can be collected without fieldwork. Desk research is basically involved in collecting data from existing resources hence it is often considered a low cost technique as compared to field research, as the main cost is involved in executive’s time, telephone charges and directories. Thus, the study relied on already published studies, reports and statistics. This secondary data was easily accessed through the online journals and library.
Findings: The findings reveal that there exists a contextual and methodological gap relating to Software-Defined Networking (SDN) for efficient network management. Preliminary empirical review revealed that SDN offered significant advantages in enhancing network agility, scalability, and operational efficiency. By centralizing network management functions and abstracting network control, SDN enabled dynamic resource allocation and optimized traffic flows. However, challenges such as security vulnerabilities, interoperability issues, and the need for specialized skills were identified. Successful SDN implementation required careful planning, rigorous testing, and strategic integration with existing IT infrastructures. Future research recommendations included further exploration of SDN technologies, evaluation of their impact on network performance and security, and the development of best practices for deployment and management to maximize benefits.
Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: The Diffusion of Innovations Theory, Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and Resource Based View (RBV) Theory may be used to anchor future studies on Software-Defined Networking (SDN). The recommendations drawn from the study on Software-Defined Networking (SDN) for Efficient Network Management focused on enhancing theoretical frameworks, improving practical implementations, informing policy development, promoting industry collaboration, addressing security concerns, and facilitating stakeholder engagement. These initiatives aimed to strengthen SDN adoption and implementation by refining theoretical models, advocating for supportive policy environments, fostering industry partnerships, addressing security challenges, and engaging stakeholders throughout the deployment process. By integrating these strategies, the study sought to optimize network management efficiency and promote sustainable technological advancements in SDN.
Downloads
References
Akhunzada, A., Gani, A., Shamshirband, S., Ahmed, E., Anuar, N. B., & Khan, M. K. (2015). Software Defined Networks: A Survey. IEEE Systems Journal, 9(3), 1106-1119. DOI:10.1109/JSYST.2014.2337891
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120. DOI:10.1177/014920639101700108
Cabinet Office, Government of Japan. (2017). Society 5.0: Co-creating the Future. Retrieved from https://www8.cao.go.jp/cstp/english/society5_0/index.html
Channeled Resources. (2018). BT’s SDN Implementation: Cost Reduction and Increased Agility. Channeled Resources.
Cisco. (2020). The Role of AI and Machine Learning in Network Management. Cisco. Retrieved from https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/solutions/artificial-intelligence.html
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. DOI:10.2307/249008
Foukas, X., Patounas, G., Elmokashfi, A., & Marina, M. K. (2017). Network Slicing in 5G: Survey and Challenges. IEEE Communications Magazine, 55(5), 94-100. DOI:10.1109/MCOM.2017.1600951
GlobalData. (2019). Telefônica Vivo’s SDN Deployment in Brazil. GlobalData.
Grand View Research. (2021). Software-Defined Networking Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report. Grand View Research. DOI:10.1016/B978-0-12-820652-3.00012-9
HM Government. (2016). National Cyber Security Strategy 2016-2021. HM Government. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-cyber-security-strategy-2016-to-2021
Hu, F., Hao, Q., & Bao, K. (2014). A Survey on Software-Defined Network and OpenFlow: From Concept to Implementation. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 16(4), 2181-2206. DOI:10.1109/COMST.2014.2326417
Jain, V., Kumar, S., & Varma, V. (2013). B4: Experience with a Globally-Deployed Software Defined WAN. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 43(4), 3-14. DOI:10.1145/2534169.2486019
Kreutz, D., Ramos, F. M. V., Esteves Verissimo, P., Rothenberg, C. E., Azodolmolky, S., & Uhlig, S. (2015). Software-Defined Networking: A Comprehensive Survey. Proceedings of the IEEE, 103(1), 14-76. DOI:10.1109/JPROC.2014.2371999
Lara, A., Kolasani, A., & Ramamurthy, B. (2014). Network Innovation using OpenFlow: A Survey. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 16(1), 493-512. DOI:10.1109/SURV.2013.081313.00105
MarketsandMarkets. (2020). Cybersecurity Market by Solution, Service, Security Type, Deployment Mode, Organization Size, Industry Vertical and Region - Global Forecast to 2025. MarketsandMarkets.
McKeown, N., Anderson, T., Balakrishnan, H., Parulkar, G., Peterson, L., Rexford, J., ... & Turner, J. (2008). OpenFlow: Enabling Innovation in Campus Networks. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 38(2), 69-74. DOI:10.1145/1355734.1355746
Mwangi, J. (2019). The Impact of SDN on Network Performance: A Case Study of Telkom SA. Journal of Network and Systems Management, 27(3), 641-659. DOI:10.1007/s10922-019-09483-4
Nadeau, T., & Gray, K. (2013). SDN: Software Defined Networks. O'Reilly Media.
Nunes, B. A. A., Mendonca, M., Nguyen, X. N., Obraczka, K., & Turletti, T. (2014). A Survey of Software-Defined Networking: Past, Present, and Future of Programmable Networks. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 16(3), 1617-1634. DOI:10.1109/SURV.2014.012214.00180
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.
Safaricom. (2020). Annual Report 2020. Safaricom. Retrieved from https://www.safaricom.co.ke/annualreport_2020/
Sezer, S., Scott-Hayward, S., Chouhan, P. K., Fraser, B., Lake, D., Finnegan, J., ... & Rao, N. (2013). Are We Ready for SDN? Implementation Challenges for Software-Defined Networks. IEEE Communications Magazine, 51(7), 36-43. DOI:10.1109/MCOM.2013.6553676
Smith, J. (2016). Efficient Network Management in the Age of IoT. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 60, 1-10. DOI:10.1016/j.jnca.2015.11.010
TechRepublic. (2021). The Future of Network Management: Trends and Predictions. TechRepublic. Retrieved from https://www.techrepublic.com/article/the-future-of-network-management-trends-and-predictions/
Yamanaka, H., Kinoshita, T., & Yamaguchi, H. (2015). NTT’s Approach to Efficient Network Management Using SDN. IEICE Transactions on Communications, E98-B(12), 2245-2253. DOI:10.1587/transcom.2015EBI0001
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Binti Shalom
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
