The Effectiveness of Social Safety Nets in Reducing Extreme Poverty
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47941/ijdcs.2169Keywords:
Social Safety Nets, Extreme Poverty, Program Designing and Targeting, Economic Mobility, Sustainable DevelopmentAbstract
Purpose: This study sought to analyze the effectiveness of social safety nets in reducing extreme poverty.
Methodology: The study adopted a desktop research methodology. Desk research refers to secondary data or that which can be collected without fieldwork. Desk research is basically involved in collecting data from existing resources hence it is often considered a low cost technique as compared to field research, as the main cost is involved in executive’s time, telephone charges and directories. Thus, the study relied on already published studies, reports and statistics. This secondary data was easily accessed through the online journals and library.
Findings: The findings reveal that there exists a contextual and methodological gap relating to the effectiveness of social safety nets in reducing extreme poverty. Preliminary empirical review revealed that social safety nets, including cash transfers, food aid, and public works programs, were effective in providing immediate relief to impoverished populations and improving their living conditions. These programs significantly contributed to increased access to essential services such as education and healthcare. However, their impact on long-term poverty reduction and economic mobility was limited due to their inability to address the underlying structural issues of poverty. The study emphasized the need for a more integrated approach that combines social safety nets with broader development initiatives to enhance their overall effectiveness and address both immediate and long-term poverty challenges.
Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: The Social Protection Theory, Human Development Theory and Capability Approach may be used to anchor future studies on social safety nets in reducing extreme poverty. The study recommended integrating social safety nets with broader development initiatives to create a holistic approach to poverty reduction. It emphasized the importance of improving program design and targeting to ensure that benefits reached those most in need and were tailored to local contexts. Adequate funding and efficient administration were deemed crucial for the success of these programs, along with fostering sustainable economic opportunities to promote long-term self-sufficiency. Additionally, the study called for enhanced monitoring and evaluation, addressing the root causes of poverty, and promoting interdisciplinary research and collaboration to improve the effectiveness and impact of social safety nets.
Downloads
References
Arezki, R., Brückner, M., & Hasanov, F. (2019). Cash transfers and poverty reduction: Evidence from a randomized control trial. Economics & Human Biology, 34, 137-155. DOI: 10.1016/j.ehb.2019.01.002
Arezki, R., Brückner, M., & Hasanov, F. (2019). Cash transfers and poverty reduction: Evidence from a randomized control trial. Economics & Human Biology, 34, 137-155. DOI: 10.1016/j.ehb.2019.01.002
Baird, S., McIntosh, C., & Özler, B. (2018). When the money runs out: Do cash transfers have sustained effects on human capital? World Bank Economic Review, 32(2), 451-469. DOI: 10.1093/wber/lhw050
Barrientos, A., & Hulme, D. (2016). Social protection for the poor and poorest: Concepts, policies, and politics. Routledge.
Bastagli, F., Hagen-Zanker, J., Harman, L., & Sturge, G. (2016). Social protection systems in middle-income countries: Evidence and challenges. Development Policy Review, 34(4), 423-444. DOI: 10.1111/dpr.12158
Card, D., Kluve, J., & Weber, A. (2018). What works? A meta analysis of recent active labor market program evaluations. Journal of the European Economic Association, 16(3), 494-511. DOI: 10.1093/jeea/jvx026
Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP). (2022). Policy basics: The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). Retrieved from https://www.cbpp.org/research/food-assistance/policy-basics-the-supplemental-nutrition-assistance-program-snap
Department for Work and Pensions (DWP). (2022). Universal Credit. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/universal-credit
Devereux, S. (2018). Social protection for the poor and vulnerable: Lessons from history. World Development, 105, 12-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.12.008
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton University Press.
Fiszbein, A., & Schady, N. (2016). Conditional cash transfers: Reducing present and future poverty. World Bank Policy Research Report. DOI: 10.1596/978-0-8213-6996-8
Graham, C. (2020). Social safety nets and poverty reduction: A global perspective. Journal of Development Studies, 56(4), 674-689. DOI: 10.1080/00220388.2019.1640742
Haddad, L., & Hawkes, C. (2016). Social protection and food security: Implications for extreme poverty reduction. Food Policy, 59, 1-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2016.01.002
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2022). Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Retrieved from https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg2/
International Labour Organization (ILO). (2021). World social protection report 2020–22: Social protection at the crossroads – in pursuit of a better future. Retrieved from https://www.ilo.org/global/research/global-reports/world-social-protection-report/2020-22/index.htm
Jack, W., & Suri, T. (2022). Mobile money: The economics of financial inclusion. Annual Review of Economics, 14, 187-208. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-economics-091821-104219
Kenya National Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Economic survey 2021. Retrieved from https://www.knbs.or.ke
Kidd, S., & Kabeer, N. (2014). Social safety nets and women’s empowerment: Evidence from developing countries. Journal of Development Studies, 50(12), 1667-1681. DOI: 10.1080/00220388.2014.941785
Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. (2021). Annual report on the status of social welfare. Retrieved from https://www.mhlw.go.jp/english/
Nussbaum, M. (2011). Creating capabilities: The human development approach. Harvard University Press.
OECD. (2022). Social protection system review: The way forward. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/social/social-protection-systems-review.htm
Ramey, V. A. (2020). The macroeconomic effects of social safety nets. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 34(1), 133-155. DOI: 10.1257/jep.34.1.133
Rao, N., & Singh, S. (2017). Social safety nets and multidimensional poverty reduction in rural India. Journal of Development Studies, 53(10), 1746-1763. DOI: 10.1080/00220388.2016.1250355
Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Alfred A. Knopf.
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (2024). Human Development Report 2024. Retrieved from https://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/librarypage.html
World Bank. (2022). Bolsa Família: Program overview. Retrieved from https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/brazil/brief/bolsa-familia
World Bank. (2022). Poverty and shared prosperity 2022: Correcting course. Retrieved from https://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/poverty-and-shared-prosperity-2022
World Bank. (2022). Social protection and poverty reduction: The impact of cash transfer programs. Retrieved from https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/socialprotection
World Bank. (2023). Global poverty overview. Retrieved from https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/poverty
World Bank. (2023). Poverty and Shared Prosperity 2022: Correcting Course. Retrieved from https://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/poverty-and-shared-prosperity
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Sentle Andile
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.