Rural Development Strategies through Livestock Policy

Authors

  • James Habimana University of Kigali

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47941/ijlp.1747

Keywords:

Livestock Farming, Rural Development, Livestock Policy, Sustainable Development, Climate Resilience

Abstract

Purpose: The main objective of the study was to investigate the rural development strategies through livestock policy.

Methodology: The study adopted a desktop research methodology. Desk research refers to secondary data or that which can be collected without fieldwork. Desk research is basically involved in collecting data from existing resources hence it is often considered a low cost technique as compared to field research, as the main cost is involved in executive's time, telephone charges and directories. Thus, the study relied on already published studies, reports and statistics. This secondary data was easily accessed through the online journals and library.

Findings: The findings reveal that there exists a contextual and methodological gap relating to rural development strategies. The study underscored the significance of livestock farming as a crucial component of rural development strategies worldwide, emphasizing its multifaceted role in providing income, employment, food security, and cultural heritage, particularly in developing countries. It highlighted the need for context-specific and evidence-based livestock policies tailored to diverse socio-economic, environmental, and cultural realities, promoting sustainable resource management and addressing rural poverty and inequality. Additionally, it emphasized integrating holistic development objectives such as gender equity, social inclusion, and climate resilience into livestock policy frameworks to maximize social, economic, and environmental benefits. Lastly, the study stressed the importance of continuous monitoring, evaluation, and adaptive management in livestock policy implementation to foster learning-oriented processes and enhance resilience and responsiveness to evolving dynamics in rural areas. Overall, the study highlighted the pivotal role of livestock policy in shaping rural development trajectories and improving the well-being of rural communities.

Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: The Dependency theory, Institutional theory and Political Ecology theory may be used to anchor future studies on rural development strategies. The study yielded several recommendations to enhance the effectiveness of livestock policy interventions in promoting rural development. These recommendations included prioritizing inclusive livestock extension services, improving access to credit and financial services, integrating climate-smart livestock practices, supporting value-adding and market access initiatives, investing in livelihood diversification, and promoting participatory policy processes. By implementing these recommendations, policymakers and stakeholders aimed to enhance the resilience, sustainability, and inclusivity of rural development efforts, ultimately improving livelihoods and fostering sustainable rural transformation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abebe, D., Tesfaye, A., & Mengistu, G. (2017). Impact of Livestock Policy on Gender Equity and Empowerment in Rural Ethiopia. World Development, 98, 138–150. DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.04.027

Barbieri, A. F., Bilsborrow, R. E., & Pan, W. (2016). Farm Household Lifecycles and Land Use Change in the Brazilian Amazon. Population and Environment, 37(3), 339–368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11111-015-0255-4

Clemente, A., & Guilhoto, J. J. M. (2016). Assessment of the Impacts of PRONAF Investments on the Brazilian Economy: A Social Accounting Matrix (SAM) Multiplier Analysis. Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural, 54(4), 653–674. https://doi.org/10.1590/1234-56781806-947900540405

Cowling, K., & Knott, D. (2019). LEADER Approach in England and Lessons for Rural Development Policy. Land Use Policy, 86, 131–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.05.025

DEFRA. (2021). Rural Development Programme for England. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/rural-development-programme-for-england

Dufour, B., & Gruère, G. (2013). Genetically Modified Crops, Livestock, and Fish: Economic Effects and Policy Implications. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6301-6

FAO. (2015). Smallholders and Family Farmers. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. http://www.fao.org/smallholders/en/

FAO. (2018). The Comprehensive Africa Agriculture Development Programme (CAADP). http://www.fao.org/ag/caadp/en/

Flachsbarth, I., Willaarts, B., Xie, H., Pitois, G., Mueller, N. D., Ringler, C., Garrido, A., & McDonald, A. (2017). The Role of Latin America’s Land and Water Resources for Global Food Security: Environmental Trade-Offs of Future Food Production Pathways. PLoS ONE, 12(6), e0179650. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179650

Fraser, D., & Weary, D. M. (2018). Understanding Animal Welfare: The Science in Its Cultural Context. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119232676

Grace, D., Dominguez-Salas, P., Alonso, S., Lannerstad, M., Muunda, E., Ngwili, N., Omar, A., & Khan, M. (2017). The Influence of Livestock-Derived Foods on Nutrition during the First 1,000 Days of Life. ILRI Research Report No. 43, International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI). https://cgspace.cgiar.org/handle/10568/88341

Hemsworth, P. H., Mellor, D. J., Cronin, G. M., & Tilbrook, A. J. (2015). Scientific Assessment of Animal Welfare. CAB International. https://doi.org/10.1079/9781780640434.0000

Hughes, D., Meyer, N., & Healy, N. (2019). Rural Business in the United States: A Snapshot of Recent Economic Trends. Economic Research Report No. ERR-265, United States Department of Agriculture. https://www.ers.usda.gov/webdocs/publications/92692/err-265.pdf?v=958.3

Johnson, K. M., Cromartie, J., & Parker, T. (2018). Rural America at a Glance: 2018 Edition. Economic Information Bulletin No. EIB-200, United States Department of Agriculture. https://www.ers.usda.gov/webdocs/publications/90554/eib-200.pdf?v=1913.7

Liu, Y., Chen, H., & Wang, X. (2020). Evaluating Livestock Policy Impacts on Environmental Sustainability in Rural China. Land Use Policy, 91, 104373. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104373

McPeak, J., & Little, P. D. (2015). Pastoral Livelihood Adaptation to Environmental and Institutional Change in Southern Ethiopia. The Geographical Journal, 181(2), 177–188. https://doi.org/10.1111/geoj.12115

MOFA. (2020). Overview of the Regional Revitalization Bureau. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan. https://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/rural/rrb/

Mushi, E., Mwakalila, S., & Temu, A. (2016). Impact of Livestock Policy on Land Use and Livelihoods in Rural Tanzania. Land Use Policy, 59, 170–182. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.08.030

Muyanga, M., & Jayne, T. S. (2014). Agricultural Extension in Kenya: Practice and Policy Lessons. Journal of International Development, 26(8), 1065–1074. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.3030

Nguyen, T., Pham, H., & Tran, L. (2019). Livestock Policy Impacts on Climate Change Adaptation and Resilience in Rural Vietnam. Environmental Science & Policy, 94, 112–121. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2018.12.025

Nugent, R., & Butcher, K. (2018). Livestock and Rural Development. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315154253

Ogutu, F., Nyangena, W., & Obare, G. (2018). Assessing Livestock Policy Effects on Market Integration and Value Chains in Rural Kenya. Agricultural Economics, 49(1), 39–52. DOI: 10.1111/agec.12445

Ragasa, C., Lambrecht, I., & Kufoalor, D. S. (2019). Agricultural Mechanization in Ghana: Insights from a Recent Field Study. Ghana Strategy Support Program (GSSP) Policy Note No. 42, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). https://doi.org/10.2499/p15738coll2.133178_01

Rahman, M., Islam, S., & Ali, M. (2015). Livestock Policy Impacts on Livelihoods and Social Capital in Rural Bangladesh. Development Policy Review, 33(3), 365–383. DOI: 10.1111/dpr.12117

Rosegrant, M. W., Cai, X., & Cline, S. A. (2014). World Water and Food to 2025: Dealing with Scarcity. International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). https://doi.org/10.2499/9780896298442

Scoones, I. (2019). Sustainable Livelihoods and Rural Development. Practical Action Publishing. https://doi.org/10.3362/9781780442281

Sharma, A. N., & Gaiha, R. (2020). Rural Development: Theories, Policies, and Practices. In R. Gaiha, A. N. Sharma, & R. Shyamsundar (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Rural Studies (pp. 1–23). Routledge.

Shrestha, P., Adhikari, S., & Dhakal, M. (2018). Assessing Livestock Policy Effects on Rural Health and Nutrition Outcomes in Nepal. Food Security, 10(5), 1209–1224. DOI: 10.1007/s12571-018-0820-2

Soares, S. S. D., Ribas, R. P., & Osório, R. G. (2019). The Bolsa Família Program and Its Impact on Poverty and Income Distribution in Brazil. Economia Aplicada, 23(4), 713–736. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1983-6309.v23n4p713-736

Sugimoto, K., Imanishi, A., & Fujimoto, T. (2017). Farm Aging and Depopulation in Rural Areas of Japan: Historical Background and Regional Differences. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(12), 1598. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14121598

USDA. (2020). Rural America at a Glance, 2019 Edition. United States Department of Agriculture. https://www.ers.usda.gov/webdocs/publications/94094/eib-212.pdf?v=3099.8

USDA. (2021). Rural Business Development Grants: Funding and Growth Trends. United States Department of Agriculture. https://www.rd.usda.gov/programs-services/rural-business-development-grants

World Bank. (2013). Enhancing Food Security in Arab Countries: A Framework for Action. World Bank Group. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-9810-9

World Bank. (2020). Africa’s Pulse, No. 21, Fall 2020: An Analysis of Issues Shaping Africa’s Economic Future. World Bank Group. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1619-0

Downloads

Published

2024-03-27

How to Cite

Habimana, J. . (2024). Rural Development Strategies through Livestock Policy. International Journal of Livestock Policy, 3(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.47941/ijlp.1747

Issue

Section

Articles