Rural Development Strategies through Livestock Policy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47941/ijlp.1747Keywords:
Livestock Farming, Rural Development, Livestock Policy, Sustainable Development, Climate ResilienceAbstract
Purpose: The main objective of the study was to investigate the rural development strategies through livestock policy.
Methodology: The study adopted a desktop research methodology. Desk research refers to secondary data or that which can be collected without fieldwork. Desk research is basically involved in collecting data from existing resources hence it is often considered a low cost technique as compared to field research, as the main cost is involved in executive's time, telephone charges and directories. Thus, the study relied on already published studies, reports and statistics. This secondary data was easily accessed through the online journals and library.
Findings: The findings reveal that there exists a contextual and methodological gap relating to rural development strategies. The study underscored the significance of livestock farming as a crucial component of rural development strategies worldwide, emphasizing its multifaceted role in providing income, employment, food security, and cultural heritage, particularly in developing countries. It highlighted the need for context-specific and evidence-based livestock policies tailored to diverse socio-economic, environmental, and cultural realities, promoting sustainable resource management and addressing rural poverty and inequality. Additionally, it emphasized integrating holistic development objectives such as gender equity, social inclusion, and climate resilience into livestock policy frameworks to maximize social, economic, and environmental benefits. Lastly, the study stressed the importance of continuous monitoring, evaluation, and adaptive management in livestock policy implementation to foster learning-oriented processes and enhance resilience and responsiveness to evolving dynamics in rural areas. Overall, the study highlighted the pivotal role of livestock policy in shaping rural development trajectories and improving the well-being of rural communities.
Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: The Dependency theory, Institutional theory and Political Ecology theory may be used to anchor future studies on rural development strategies. The study yielded several recommendations to enhance the effectiveness of livestock policy interventions in promoting rural development. These recommendations included prioritizing inclusive livestock extension services, improving access to credit and financial services, integrating climate-smart livestock practices, supporting value-adding and market access initiatives, investing in livelihood diversification, and promoting participatory policy processes. By implementing these recommendations, policymakers and stakeholders aimed to enhance the resilience, sustainability, and inclusivity of rural development efforts, ultimately improving livelihoods and fostering sustainable rural transformation.
Downloads
References
Abebe, D., Tesfaye, A., & Mengistu, G. (2017). Impact of Livestock Policy on Gender Equity and Empowerment in Rural Ethiopia. World Development, 98, 138–150. DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.04.027
Barbieri, A. F., Bilsborrow, R. E., & Pan, W. (2016). Farm Household Lifecycles and Land Use Change in the Brazilian Amazon. Population and Environment, 37(3), 339–368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11111-015-0255-4
Clemente, A., & Guilhoto, J. J. M. (2016). Assessment of the Impacts of PRONAF Investments on the Brazilian Economy: A Social Accounting Matrix (SAM) Multiplier Analysis. Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural, 54(4), 653–674. https://doi.org/10.1590/1234-56781806-947900540405
Cowling, K., & Knott, D. (2019). LEADER Approach in England and Lessons for Rural Development Policy. Land Use Policy, 86, 131–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.05.025
DEFRA. (2021). Rural Development Programme for England. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/rural-development-programme-for-england
Dufour, B., & Gruère, G. (2013). Genetically Modified Crops, Livestock, and Fish: Economic Effects and Policy Implications. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6301-6
FAO. (2015). Smallholders and Family Farmers. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. http://www.fao.org/smallholders/en/
FAO. (2018). The Comprehensive Africa Agriculture Development Programme (CAADP). http://www.fao.org/ag/caadp/en/
Flachsbarth, I., Willaarts, B., Xie, H., Pitois, G., Mueller, N. D., Ringler, C., Garrido, A., & McDonald, A. (2017). The Role of Latin America’s Land and Water Resources for Global Food Security: Environmental Trade-Offs of Future Food Production Pathways. PLoS ONE, 12(6), e0179650. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179650
Fraser, D., & Weary, D. M. (2018). Understanding Animal Welfare: The Science in Its Cultural Context. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119232676
Grace, D., Dominguez-Salas, P., Alonso, S., Lannerstad, M., Muunda, E., Ngwili, N., Omar, A., & Khan, M. (2017). The Influence of Livestock-Derived Foods on Nutrition during the First 1,000 Days of Life. ILRI Research Report No. 43, International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI). https://cgspace.cgiar.org/handle/10568/88341
Hemsworth, P. H., Mellor, D. J., Cronin, G. M., & Tilbrook, A. J. (2015). Scientific Assessment of Animal Welfare. CAB International. https://doi.org/10.1079/9781780640434.0000
Hughes, D., Meyer, N., & Healy, N. (2019). Rural Business in the United States: A Snapshot of Recent Economic Trends. Economic Research Report No. ERR-265, United States Department of Agriculture. https://www.ers.usda.gov/webdocs/publications/92692/err-265.pdf?v=958.3
Johnson, K. M., Cromartie, J., & Parker, T. (2018). Rural America at a Glance: 2018 Edition. Economic Information Bulletin No. EIB-200, United States Department of Agriculture. https://www.ers.usda.gov/webdocs/publications/90554/eib-200.pdf?v=1913.7
Liu, Y., Chen, H., & Wang, X. (2020). Evaluating Livestock Policy Impacts on Environmental Sustainability in Rural China. Land Use Policy, 91, 104373. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104373
McPeak, J., & Little, P. D. (2015). Pastoral Livelihood Adaptation to Environmental and Institutional Change in Southern Ethiopia. The Geographical Journal, 181(2), 177–188. https://doi.org/10.1111/geoj.12115
MOFA. (2020). Overview of the Regional Revitalization Bureau. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan. https://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/rural/rrb/
Mushi, E., Mwakalila, S., & Temu, A. (2016). Impact of Livestock Policy on Land Use and Livelihoods in Rural Tanzania. Land Use Policy, 59, 170–182. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.08.030
Muyanga, M., & Jayne, T. S. (2014). Agricultural Extension in Kenya: Practice and Policy Lessons. Journal of International Development, 26(8), 1065–1074. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.3030
Nguyen, T., Pham, H., & Tran, L. (2019). Livestock Policy Impacts on Climate Change Adaptation and Resilience in Rural Vietnam. Environmental Science & Policy, 94, 112–121. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2018.12.025
Nugent, R., & Butcher, K. (2018). Livestock and Rural Development. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315154253
Ogutu, F., Nyangena, W., & Obare, G. (2018). Assessing Livestock Policy Effects on Market Integration and Value Chains in Rural Kenya. Agricultural Economics, 49(1), 39–52. DOI: 10.1111/agec.12445
Ragasa, C., Lambrecht, I., & Kufoalor, D. S. (2019). Agricultural Mechanization in Ghana: Insights from a Recent Field Study. Ghana Strategy Support Program (GSSP) Policy Note No. 42, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). https://doi.org/10.2499/p15738coll2.133178_01
Rahman, M., Islam, S., & Ali, M. (2015). Livestock Policy Impacts on Livelihoods and Social Capital in Rural Bangladesh. Development Policy Review, 33(3), 365–383. DOI: 10.1111/dpr.12117
Rosegrant, M. W., Cai, X., & Cline, S. A. (2014). World Water and Food to 2025: Dealing with Scarcity. International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). https://doi.org/10.2499/9780896298442
Scoones, I. (2019). Sustainable Livelihoods and Rural Development. Practical Action Publishing. https://doi.org/10.3362/9781780442281
Sharma, A. N., & Gaiha, R. (2020). Rural Development: Theories, Policies, and Practices. In R. Gaiha, A. N. Sharma, & R. Shyamsundar (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Rural Studies (pp. 1–23). Routledge.
Shrestha, P., Adhikari, S., & Dhakal, M. (2018). Assessing Livestock Policy Effects on Rural Health and Nutrition Outcomes in Nepal. Food Security, 10(5), 1209–1224. DOI: 10.1007/s12571-018-0820-2
Soares, S. S. D., Ribas, R. P., & Osório, R. G. (2019). The Bolsa Família Program and Its Impact on Poverty and Income Distribution in Brazil. Economia Aplicada, 23(4), 713–736. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1983-6309.v23n4p713-736
Sugimoto, K., Imanishi, A., & Fujimoto, T. (2017). Farm Aging and Depopulation in Rural Areas of Japan: Historical Background and Regional Differences. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(12), 1598. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14121598
USDA. (2020). Rural America at a Glance, 2019 Edition. United States Department of Agriculture. https://www.ers.usda.gov/webdocs/publications/94094/eib-212.pdf?v=3099.8
USDA. (2021). Rural Business Development Grants: Funding and Growth Trends. United States Department of Agriculture. https://www.rd.usda.gov/programs-services/rural-business-development-grants
World Bank. (2013). Enhancing Food Security in Arab Countries: A Framework for Action. World Bank Group. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-9810-9
World Bank. (2020). Africa’s Pulse, No. 21, Fall 2020: An Analysis of Issues Shaping Africa’s Economic Future. World Bank Group. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1619-0
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 James Habimana
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.