Policy Approaches to Combat Livestock Theft and Enhance Security

Authors

  • Maina Stephen Machakos University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47941/ijlp.1963

Keywords:

Livestock Theft, Livestock Security, Legislative Measures, GPS Tracking, RFID Tags

Abstract

Purpose: This study sought to analyze policy approaches to combat livestock theft and enhance security.

Methodology: The study adopted a desktop research methodology. Desk research refers to secondary data or that which can be collected without fieldwork. Desk research is basically involved in collecting data from existing resources hence it is often considered a low cost technique as compared to field research, as the main cost is involved in executive's time, telephone charges and directories. Thus, the study relied on already published studies, reports and statistics. This secondary data was easily accessed through the online journals and library.

Findings: The findings reveal that there exists a contextual and methodological gap relating to policy approaches to combat livestock theft and enhance security. Preliminary empirical review revealed that a multi-faceted approach is essential to effectively address livestock theft. It emphasized the importance of integrating legislative measures, technological innovations, community-based initiatives, and enhanced law enforcement efforts. Technologies like GPS tracking and RFID tags were found effective but required financial support for widespread adoption. Community involvement and education were highlighted as critical for local surveillance and theft prevention. The study also underscored the need for robust legislative frameworks and international cooperation to deter theft and ensure consistent enforcement

Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: The Routine Activity Theory, Rational Choice Theory and Situational Crime Prevention Theory may be used to anchor future studies on policy approaches on combating livestock theft and enhance security. The study concluded that an integrated approach, including advanced security technologies, community involvement, and robust legislative frameworks, was essential for effectively reducing livestock theft. It highlighted the need for financial incentives to help farmers adopt GPS tracking and RFID tags, expanded community-based initiatives like Farm Watch, and stricter penalties for theft. The study also emphasized the importance of international cooperation for standardizing livestock identification practices and supporting cross-border law enforcement efforts. These recommendations aimed to enhance livestock security, mitigate financial losses, and improve community resilience

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ABIEC. (2018). Annual report 2018. Brazilian Association of Beef Exporters. Retrieved from http://www.abiec.com.br/

Becker, G. S. (1968). Crime and punishment: An economic approach. Journal of Political Economy, 76(2), 169-217. https://doi.org/10.1086/259394

Clarke, R. V. (1980). "Situational" crime prevention: Theory and practice. British Journal of Criminology, 20(2), 136-147. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.bjc.a047185

Cohen, L. E., & Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44(4), 588-608. https://doi.org/10.2307/2094589

Davies, J., & Hatfield, R. (2018). The economics of mobile pastoralism: A global summary. Nomadic Peoples, 22(1), 24-47. https://doi.org/10.3197/np.2018.220103

Fernandez-Gimenez, M. E., & Batkhishig, B. (2015). Cross-boundary and cross-level dynamics increase vulnerability to severe winter disasters (dzud) in Mongolia. Global Environmental Change, 35, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.05.005

Harris, L., & Yelds, A. (2015). Technology in agriculture: Reducing theft through innovation. Agricultural Systems, 132, 112-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2014.09.004

Jones, K., & Brown, M. (2019). Economic impacts of livestock theft: A longitudinal study. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 70(2), 379-394. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.12345

Kamilaris, A., Fonts, A., & Prenafeta-Boldú, F. X. (2019). The rise of blockchain technology in agriculture and food supply chains. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 91, 640-652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2019.07.034

Kansiime, M. K., & Mutenje, M. J. (2019). Integrating indigenous knowledge in climate risk management in sub-Saharan Africa. Climate and Development, 11(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2017.1410089

Kenya National Police Service. (2019). Annual crime report 2019. Retrieved from https://www.nationalpolice.go.ke/

Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries. (2018). Livestock statistics report 2018. Retrieved from http://www.maff.go.jp/e/index.html

NFU. (2020). Rural crime report 2020. National Farmers Union. Retrieved from https://www.nfuonline.com/

Oba, G. (2020). Harnessing pastoralists’ indigenous knowledge for rangeland management: Three African case studies. Pastoralism, 10(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13570-020-00166-x

Smith, H., & Williamson, T. (2017). Rural crime and policing. Journal of Rural Studies, 55, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.07.002

TSCRA. (2019). Cattle theft and law enforcement. Texas and Southwestern Cattle Raisers Association. Retrieved from https://www.tscra.org/

USDA. (2018). Livestock and poultry: World markets and trade. United States Department of Agriculture. Retrieved from https://www.usda.gov/

Downloads

Published

2024-06-05

How to Cite

Stephen, M. . (2024). Policy Approaches to Combat Livestock Theft and Enhance Security. International Journal of Livestock Policy, 3(1), 43–54. https://doi.org/10.47941/ijlp.1963

Issue

Section

Articles