Economic Policies and their Influence on Livestock Market Dynamics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47941/ijlp.1969Keywords:
Economic Policies, Fiscal Policies, Monetary Policies, Trade Policies, Industry Associations, Policy CoherenceAbstract
Purpose: The general objective of the study was to explore the economic policies and their influence on livestock market dynamics.
Methodology: The study adopted a desktop research methodology. Desk research refers to secondary data or that which can be collected without fieldwork. Desk research is basically involved in collecting data from existing resources hence it is often considered a low cost technique as compared to field research, as the main cost is involved in executive's time, telephone charges and directories. Thus, the study relied on already published studies, reports and statistics. This secondary data was easily accessed through the online journals and library.
Findings: The findings reveal that there exists a contextual and methodological gap relating to economic policies and their influence on livestock market dynamics. Preliminary empirical review revealed that fiscal policies, such as subsidies and tax incentives, play a crucial role in reducing production costs and stabilizing market supply. Likewise, monetary policies, including interest rate adjustments, influence investment and innovation within the sector. Trade policies, such as tariffs and free trade agreements, affect market competitiveness and access to international markets. Regulatory policies concerning animal health and environmental protection ensure product quality and consumer confidence. The study emphasizes the need for balanced and well-designed policies across all these areas to support the sustainable growth of the livestock industry.
Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: Keynesian Economic Theory, Neoclassical Economic Theory and Institutional Economic Theory may be used to anchor future studies on economic policies and their influence on livestock market dynamics. The study significantly advances theoretical understanding by elucidating the intricate relationship between economic policies and livestock market dynamics. It recommends further exploration into the interplay of fiscal, monetary, trade, and regulatory policies to develop comprehensive models predicting market behavior accurately. Practically, the study advises livestock producers to adopt adaptive management practices, staying informed about policy changes and implementing flexible business strategies. Industry associations are urged to disseminate policy information and support farmers in navigating shifts. From a policy standpoint, coherence, targeting, and responsiveness to sectoral needs are underscored, advocating for a holistic approach to policy design. Fiscal policies should support short-term stability and long-term sustainability, targeting critical areas like feed costs and infrastructure. Monetary policies should balance investment stimulation with inflation control, while trade and regulatory policies should negotiate balanced agreements and stringent standards to ensure competitiveness and safety in the global market.
Downloads
References
Bernanke, B. S. (2013). The Federal Reserve and the Financial Crisis. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400848705
Blinder, A. S. (2010). Keynesian economics. The Concise Encyclopedia of Economics. Retrieved from https://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/KeynesianEconomics.html
Brown, M., Thompson, P., & Green, R. (2018). Brexit and its implications for the UK livestock sector. Agricultural Policy Review, 72(4), 341-359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2018.04.007
Commons, J. R. (1931). Institutional economics. American Economic Review, 21(4), 648-657.
Costa, P., Lima, M., & Santos, F. (2016). Climate change and livestock production in Brazil: Challenges and adaptation strategies. Climate Policy, 16(4), 474-487. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2015.1042135
FAO. (2020). Meat Market Review: Overview of global meat market developments in 2020. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved from https://www.fao.org/3/cb2634en/cb2634en.pdf
Hartman, K., Robinson, J., & Wallace, R. (2014). Consumer demand for organic livestock products in the United States. Journal of Agricultural and Food Economics, 7(1), 23-34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40100-014-0023-5
Jevons, W. S. (1871). The Theory of Political Economy. London: Macmillan and Co.
Johnson, J., Smith, R., & Anderson, P. (2015). The impact of agricultural policy on livestock markets. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 66(3), 456-472. https://doi.org/10.1111/jae.12098
Keynes, J. M. (1936). The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money. London: Macmillan.
Mankiw, N. G. (2018). Principles of Economics (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Menger, C. (1871). Principles of Economics. Vienna: Braumüller.
Ndung'u, G., Kamau, J., & Mwangi, A. (2021). The African Continental Free Trade Area and its potential impact on the livestock sector. African Economic Research Consortium, 35(3), 78-96. https://doi.org/10.1080/10281790.2021.1908176
North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ouma, E., Okello, J., & Obaa, B. (2017). Livestock policies and their impact on smallholder farmers in Africa. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 12(15), 1283-1292. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJAR2017.12200
Silva, J., Mendes, A., & Rocha, R. (2019). Environmental policies and their effects on the Brazilian livestock sector. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 21(3), 509-529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10018-019-00245-7
Stiglitz, J. E. (1989). Markets, market failures, and development. American Economic Review, 79(2), 197-203.
Tanaka, T., Ito, K., & Yamamoto, H. (2015). The impact of precision farming technology on livestock production in Japan. Precision Agriculture, 16(2), 123-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-015-9385-3
Veblen, T. (1899). The Theory of the Leisure Class: An Economic Study of Institutions. New York: Macmillan.
Walras, L. (1874). Elements of Pure Economics. Lausanne: L. Corbaz & Co.
Wilson, T., Anderson, R., & Martinez, S. (2020). The impact of USMCA on the North American livestock market. International Trade Journal, 34(2), 132-148. https://doi.org/10.1080/08853908.2020.1728392
Yamaguchi, K., Saito, T., & Nakashima, T. (2016). Agricultural policies and their impact on livestock production in Japan. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 8(2), 125-138. https://doi.org/10.4236/jast.2016.82010
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Jennifer Mukasa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.