The Nature of Moral Realism vs. Anti-Realism and Its Implications for Moral Discourse and Practice
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47941/ijp.1870Keywords:
Moral Realism, Anti-Realism, Moral Discourse, Beliefs, Philosophy, Ethics, Interdisciplinary, Collaboration, Ethical Leadership, Professional PracticeAbstract
Purpose: The general objective of this study was to explore the nature of moral realism vs. anti-realism and its implications for moral discourse and practice.
Methodology: The study adopted a desktop research methodology. Desk research refers to secondary data or that which can be collected without fieldwork. Desk research is basically involved in collecting data from existing resources hence it is often considered a low cost technique as compared to field research, as the main cost is involved in executive's time, telephone charges and directories. Thus, the study relied on already published studies, reports and statistics. This secondary data was easily accessed through the online journals and library.
Findings: The findings reveal that there exists a contextual and methodological gap relating to the nature of moral realism vs. anti-realism and its implications for moral discourse and practice. Preliminary empirical review revealed that individuals' beliefs about moral realism vs. anti-realism significantly influenced their moral reasoning and behaviors, with proponents of moral realism exhibiting absolutist moral judgments while those endorsing anti-realism demonstrated greater moral flexibility. Cultural and ideological variations in these beliefs were evident, reflecting diverse societal norms and values. Longitudinal studies revealed the developmental origins of these beliefs, emphasizing the importance of early moral education. Overall, the study highlighted the complex interplay between philosophical perspectives on morality and real-world implications, advocating for informed and culturally sensitive approaches to moral discourse and practice.
Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: The Kohlberg's Stages of Moral Development, Social Identity theory and Cultural Relativism may be used to anchor future studies on the nature of moral realism vs. anti-realism. The study provided valuable recommendations for theory, practice, and policy. It contributed to theoretical advancements in moral philosophy by integrating empirical evidence with philosophical insights, thereby refining existing theories and generating new avenues for exploration. The findings had practical implications for educators, policymakers, and practitioners, emphasizing the importance of ethical education, interdisciplinary collaboration, and ethical leadership practices. Policy recommendations highlighted the need for contextually sensitive approaches to addressing ethical issues, while ethical practice emphasized fostering open dialogue and ethical reflexivity in professional settings. The study also identified future research directions, suggesting the importance of longitudinal and interdisciplinary studies to further advance our understanding of morality and ethics.
Keywords: Moral Realism, Anti-Realism, Moral Discourse, Beliefs, Philosophy, Ethics, Interdisciplinary, Collaboration, Ethical Leadership, Professional Practice
Downloads
References
Bastos, J., & Santos, R. (2014). Religion and morality in Brazil: A new moral order?. Journal of Religion and Society, 16, 1-18.
Davie, G. (2015). Religion in Britain: Neither believing nor belonging. Sociology of Religion, 76(2), 187-197.
Evans, R. (2017). Catholicism, moral values, and public policy in Brazil. Latin American Politics and Society, 59(2), 1-24.
Graham, J., & Nosek, B. (2018). Cultural and ideological correlates of beliefs about moral realism vs. anti-realism: A large-scale survey study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 115(4), 564-580.
Gray, K., & Wegner, D. (2014). Beliefs about moral realism vs. anti-realism and moral behavior: An experimental study. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40(10), 1396-1405.
Greene, J., & Cohen, J. (2013). Neural correlates of moral realism vs. anti-realism: A neuroimaging study. Journal of Neuroscience, 33(22), 8902-8910.
Haidt, J., & Bjorklund, F. (2018). The moral foundations of moral realism: A cross-cultural study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 49(2), 197-213.
Hauser, M., & Singer, P. (2016). The development of moral realism and anti-realism in children: A longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 52(3), 478-491.
Joyce, R. (2016). The evolution of morality. MIT Press.
Kohlberg, L. (1984). The psychology of moral development: The nature and validity of moral stages (Vol. 2). Harper & Row.
Miller, C. (2017). The moral effects of globalization on Japan. Social Science Japan Journal, 20(2), 171-191.
Nichols, S. (2014). The importance of moral psychology to the philosophy of morality. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 17(1), 91-107.
Nichols, S., & Knobe, J. (2015). Moral responsibility and determinism: The cognitive science of folk intuitions. Noûs, 41(4), 663-685.
Norasakkunkit, V., & Uchida, Y. (2011). Psychological consequences of post-industrial anomie on self and motivation among Japanese youth. Journal of Social Issues, 67(4), 774-786.
Okafor, F. (2015). Islam and the challenges of moral order in Nigeria. Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs, 35(3), 404-417.
Park, J., Kim, J., & Kim, S. (2018). Attitudes toward euthanasia and assisted suicide among the general public in the UK: A cross-sectional survey. BMC Medical Ethics, 19(1), 1-11.
Pew Research Center. (2018). Religion in sub-Saharan Africa.
Pew Research Center. (2020). In Brazil, decline of Catholicism continues at a rapid pace.
Pew Research Center. (2021). In U.S., decline of Christianity continues at rapid pace.
Rachels, J., & Rachels, S. (2019). The elements of moral philosophy (9th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Shafer-Landau, R. (2018). Moral realism: A defence. Oxford University Press.
Smith, G. (2019). Religious polarization in the United States. Sociological Science, 6, 339-360.
Street, S. (2016). What is moral realism? Oxford University Press.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7-24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
Takahashi, K. (2019). Culture and morality: The case of Japan. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 50(3), 321-335.
Twenge, J., Exline, J., Grubbs, J., Sastry, R., & Campbell, W. (2015). Generational and time period differences in American adolescents’ religious orientation, 1966–2014. PLoS ONE, 10(5), e0121454.
Voas, D., & Ling, R. (2020). Assessing religious change and diversity in the United Kingdom. In D. H. Olson (Ed.), Religion in Britain: Challenges and changes (pp. 35-48). Springer.
Wright, R., & Harris, S. (2019). Moral realism and attitudes towards controversial moral issues: A national survey. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10(3), 342-356.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Trycia Nabunya
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
