The Philosophy of Technology and Its Impact on Human Values
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47941/ijp.2089Keywords:
Technological Advancements, Human Values, Ethical Considerations, Value-Sensitive Design, Regulatory FrameworksAbstract
Purpose: The general objective of this study was to explore the impact of existentialism on contemporary mental health practices.
Methodology: The study adopted a desktop research methodology. Desk research refers to secondary data or that which can be collected without fieldwork. Desk research is basically involved in collecting data from existing resources hence it is often considered a low cost technique as compared to field research, as the main cost is involved in executive’s time, telephone charges and directories. Thus, the study relied on already published studies, reports and statistics. This secondary data was easily accessed through the online journals and library.
Findings: The findings reveal that there exists a contextual and methodological gap relating to the impact of existentialism on contemporary mental health practices. Preliminary empirical review revealed that integrating existential principles into contemporary mental health practices significantly enhanced psychological well-being by fostering self-awareness, personal growth, and the ability to cope with existential anxieties. It demonstrated that existential therapies offered a more holistic and personalized approach to mental health care, addressing both symptomatic relief and underlying existential concerns. Additionally, the study highlighted the importance of cultural sensitivity, emphasizing that culturally adapted existential therapies were more effective and accessible across diverse cultural contexts, thereby improving mental health outcomes globally.
Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: The Existential Theory, Humanistic Theory and Cognitive Behavioural Theory may be used to anchor future studies on the impact of existentialism on contemporary mental health practices. The study recommended integrating existential principles into psychological theories, training mental health professionals in existential therapeutic approaches, and developing culturally adapted versions of these therapies. It emphasized the need for mental health policies to recognize the importance of existential concerns and support the inclusion of existential therapies in standard care. The study also suggested revising mental health education curricula to incorporate existential psychology, providing continuing education for current practitioners, and increasing public awareness to destigmatize existential issues. These steps aim to enhance theoretical frameworks, clinical practices, and policy development in mental health care.
Downloads
References
Borgmann, A. (2012). Technology and the character of contemporary life: A philosophical inquiry. University of Chicago Press.
boyd, d. (2014). It's complicated: The social lives of networked teens. Yale University Press.
Brey, P. (2012). Values in technology and disclosive computer ethics. Cambridge Handbook of Information and Computer Ethics, 41-58. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511978036.004
Brown, L., & Patel, R. (2015). Cultural Heritage and National Identity in the United Kingdom. Journal of Cultural Studies, 12(3), 301-315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-015-0623-4
Chukwu, O., & Nwosu, A. (2018). Communal Values and Social Development in African Societies. African Journal of Social Sciences, 10(2), 205-220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3999-3
Coeckelbergh, M. (2013). Human being @ risk: Enhancement, technology, and the evaluation of vulnerability transformations. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5121-8
Crawford, K. (2021). Atlas of AI: Power, politics, and the planetary costs of artificial intelligence. Yale University Press. https://doi.org/10.12987/9780300252392
Ellul, J. (1964). The technological society. Knopf.
Ess, C. (2012). Digital media ethics. Polity.
Eubanks, V. (2018). Automating inequality: How high-tech tools profile, police, and punish the poor. St. Martin's Press. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243919867341
Feenberg, A. (2002). Transforming technology: A critical theory revisited. Oxford University Press.
Floridi, L. (2014). The ethics of information. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199641321.001.0001
Gabrys, J. (2013). Digital rubbish: A natural history of electronics. University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/dcbooks.9380304.0001.001
Haraway, D. J. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822373780
Heidegger, M. (1977). The question concerning technology, and other essays. Harper & Row.
Ihde, D. (2015). Experimental phenomenology: Multistabilities (2nd ed.). SUNY Press.
Jones, T., & Kim, S. (2014). Freedom and Equality: Core American Values. Journal of American Studies, 25(4), 455-470. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221325.2014.946087
Jones, T., Smith, R., & Lee, K. (2020). Social Responsibility and Welfare Policies: A Comparative Analysis. International Journal of Social Policy, 30(2), 123-137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12061-020-09377-8
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford University Press.
Manovich, L. (2013). Software takes command. Bloomsbury Academic. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781628927336
McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding media: The extensions of man. McGraw-Hill.
Miller, D., & Thompson, A. (2022). Global Ethics and the Future of Human Values. Ethics and International Affairs, 36(1), 45-60. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0892679422000053
Mitcham, C. (2020). Steps toward a philosophy of engineering: Historico-philosophical and critical essays. SUNY Press.
Patel, S., & Singh, R. (2021). Globalization and Cultural Values: Trends and Tensions. Journal of Global Studies, 29(3), 309-324. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-021-00427-0
Postman, N. (1992). Technopoly: The surrender of culture to technology. Vintage Books.
Smith, M., & Kim, Y. (2019). Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Human Values. International Journal of Cross-Cultural Management, 16(1), 67-82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470595818814395
Smith, P., & Kim, Y. (2014). American Values in the 21st Century. Journal of Social Research, 21(1), 78-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0389-2
Souza, M., & Santos, R. (2017). Social Justice and Diversity in Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Social Issues, 14(2), 189-202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12116-017-9225-6
Turkle, S. (2015). Reclaiming conversation: The power of talk in a digital age. Penguin Press.
van Dijk, J. (2020). The digital divide. Polity.
Verbeek, P. P. (2012). Moralizing technology: Understanding and designing the morality of things. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226852904.001.0001
Yamamoto, H., & Suzuki, T. (2016). Harmony and Respect in Japanese Culture. Journal of Japanese Studies, 42(3), 321-334. https://doi.org/10.1353/jjs.2016.0045
Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. PublicAffairs.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Tony Anga
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.