Philosophical Analysis of Sustainable Development Goals

Authors

  • Deborah Mixon Rhodes University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47941/ijp.2090

Keywords:

Ethical Perspectives, Inclusive and Participatory Approaches, Integrated Policy Frameworks, Monitoring and Evaluation Mechanisms, Sustainability Education

Abstract

Purpose: The general objective of the study was to examine philosophical analysis of Sustainable Development Goals.

Methodology: The study adopted a desktop research methodology. Desk research refers to secondary data or that which can be collected without fieldwork. Desk research is basically involved in collecting data from existing resources hence it is often considered a low cost technique as compared to field research, as the main cost is involved in executive’s time, telephone charges and directories. Thus, the study relied on already published studies, reports and statistics. This secondary data was easily accessed through the online journals and library.

Findings: The findings reveal that there exists a contextual and methodological gap relating to philosophical analysis of Sustainable Development Goals. Preliminary empirical review revealed the crucial interplay of ethical, epistemological, and metaphysical considerations in achieving global sustainability. It highlighted the SDGs' foundation on principles of equity, justice, and human rights, emphasizing the need for inclusive and context-sensitive knowledge systems. The analysis also prompted a rethinking of traditional development notions, advocating for a holistic view that includes social and environmental well-being. The conclusion stressed the importance of integrating these philosophical dimensions into policymaking to create effective, inclusive strategies for sustainable global progress.

Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: The Utilitarianism, Deontological Ethics and the Social Contract Theory may be used to anchor future studies on the philosophical analysis of SDGs. The study recommended integrating diverse ethical perspectives into development theories, emphasizing inclusive and participatory approaches in practice, and promoting integrated policy frameworks that align with the holistic nature of the SDGs. It highlighted the need for robust monitoring and evaluation mechanisms, enhanced global cooperation, and the incorporation of sustainability and ethical considerations into educational curricula. These recommendations aimed to ensure that development efforts were economically viable, socially just, and environmentally sustainable, ultimately fostering a more inclusive and effective pursuit of the SDGs.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bentham, J. (2018). An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/actrade/9780199553479.book.1

City of New York. (2019). OneNYC 2050: Building a Strong and Fair City. Retrieved from https://onenyc.cityofnewyork.us/

Committee on Climate Change. (2019). Net Zero: The UK's Contribution to Stopping Global Warming. Retrieved from https://www.theccc.org.uk/publication/net-zero-the-uks-contribution-to-stopping-global-warming/

Elliott, J. (2013). An Introduction to Sustainable Development. Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203152071

Escobar, A. (2018). Designs for the Pluriverse: Radical Interdependence, Autonomy, and the Making of Worlds. Duke University Press. DOI: 10.1215/9780822371816

Government of Japan. (2019). Society 5.0. Retrieved from https://www.japan.go.jp/

James, W. (2012). Pragmatism: A New Name for Some Old Ways of Thinking. Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139149837

James, W. (2012). Pragmatism: A New Name for Some Old Ways of Thinking. Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139149837

Kant, I. (2012). Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511809590

Kates, R. W., Parris, T. M., & Leiserowitz, A. A. (2016). What is sustainable development? Goals, indicators, values, and practice. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 47(3), 8-21. DOI: 10.1080/00139157.2005.10524444

Martens, J. (2017). SDGs: Transforming our world?. Global Policy, 8(5), 18-26. DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.12344

Mill, J. S. (2012). Utilitarianism. Hackett Publishing Company. DOI: 10.1093/actrade/9780198751630.book.1

Nishida, K. (2017). An Inquiry into the Good. Yale University Press. DOI: 10.12987/yale/9780300022357.001.0001

ONS (Office for National Statistics). (2020). UK renewable energy consumption. Retrieved from https://www.ons.gov.uk

Raworth, K. (2017). Doughnut Economics: Seven Ways to Think Like a 21st-Century Economist. Chelsea Green Publishing. DOI: 10.12968/dofu.2017.30.8.447

Rousseau, J. J. (2014). The Social Contract. Penguin Classics. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctt15jj6sp

Sachs, J. D. (2015). The Age of Sustainable Development. Columbia University Press. DOI: 10.7312/sach17314

Scoones, I. (2015). Sustainable Livelihoods and Rural Development. Practical Action Publishing. DOI: 10.3362/9781780448762

Sen, A. (2013). The ends and means of sustainability. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 14(1), 6-20. DOI: 10.1080/19452829.2012.747492

Soares, F. V. (2016). Bolsa Família, its design, its impacts, and possibilities for the future. International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2882875

Soares, F. V. (2016). Bolsa Família, its design, its impacts, and possibilities for the future. International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2882875

Tutu, D. (2013). Ubuntu: I am because we are. Hachette Books. DOI: 10.5040/9781350042401

UNDP (United Nations Development Programme). (2020). Human Development Report 2020. Retrieved from http://hdr.undp.org

United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Retrieved from https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda

United Nations. (2020). The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2020. Retrieved from https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2020/

UNSD (United Nations Statistics Division). (2020). The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2020. Retrieved from https://unstats.un.org

WIPO (World Intellectual Property Organization). (2020). Global Innovation Index 2020. Retrieved from https://www.wipo.int

Downloads

Published

2024-07-13

How to Cite

Mixon, D. (2024). Philosophical Analysis of Sustainable Development Goals. International Journal of Philosophy, 3(3), 44–58. https://doi.org/10.47941/ijp.2090

Issue

Section

Articles