The Role of Philosophy in Addressing Climate Change
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47941/ijp.2095Keywords:
Philosophy, Climate Change, Ethics, Environmental Philosophy, SustainabilityAbstract
Purpose: The general objective of this study was to investigate the role of philosophy in addressing climate change.
Methodology: The study adopted a desktop research methodology. Desk research refers to secondary data or that which can be collected without fieldwork. Desk research is basically involved in collecting data from existing resources hence it is often considered a low cost technique as compared to field research, as the main cost is involved in executive’s time, telephone charges and directories. Thus, the study relied on already published studies, reports and statistics. This secondary data was easily accessed through the online journals and library.
Findings: The findings reveal that there exists a contextual and methodological gap relating to philosophy in addressing climate change. The study underscored the indispensable role of philosophy in combating climate change by examining its ethical, epistemological, and socio-political dimensions. It highlighted the importance of ethical theories like utilitarianism and intergenerational justice in ensuring climate policies are just and equitable. The study emphasized epistemic justice, advocating for the inclusion of marginalized perspectives to create more inclusive climate policies. It also revealed the interconnectedness of environmental and social justice, calling for holistic climate strategies that address social inequalities. Overall, the study demonstrated that integrating philosophical insights into climate action fosters a more ethical, effective, and sustainable response to the climate crisis.
Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: The Utilitarianism, Intergenerational Justice and Epistemic Justice Theory may be used to anchor future studies on the role of philosophy in addressing climate change. The study recommended incorporating a broader range of philosophical theories into climate change research, integrating ethical considerations systematically into climate action plans, and adopting ethically informed policies that prioritize justice, equity, and sustainability. It emphasized the need for ethical leadership, promoting epistemic justice by including marginalized communities in climate discourse, and fostering global cooperation through international ethical standards and strengthened partnerships. These recommendations aimed to create more comprehensive, inclusive, and effective responses to climate change.
Downloads
References
BEIS. (2021). UK Energy in Brief 2021. Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/uk-energy-in-brief-2021
Brazilian Government. (2020). Brazil’s Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC). Retrieved from https://www4.unfccc.int/sites/ndcstaging/PublishedDocuments/Brazil%20First/Brazil%20First%20NDC%20(Updated%20submission).pdf
Broome, J. (2012). Climate matters: Ethics in a warming world. W.W. Norton & Company.
Caney, S. (2012). Justice and the distribution of greenhouse gas emissions. Journal of Global Ethics, 8(2), 201-223. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449626.2012.699975
EIA. (2021). Electricity Explained: Electricity in the United States. U.S. Energy Information Administration. Retrieved from https://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/electricity/electricity-in-the-us.php
EPE. (2021). Brazilian Energy Balance 2021: Year 2020. Empresa de Pesquisa Energética. Retrieved from https://www.epe.gov.br/en/publications/Brazilian-Energy-Balance
Ethiopian Government. (2019). Green Legacy Initiative. Office of the Prime Minister - Ethiopia. Retrieved from https://www.pmo.gov.et/green-legacy/
Fraser, N. (2017). The Old is Dying and the New Cannot Be Born: From Progressive Neoliberalism to Trump and Beyond. Verso.
Freitas, L. C. de, Santos, J. P., Oliveira, R. F., & Mendes, T. B. (2021). Deforestation and its implications on the Amazon biome. Journal of Environmental Management, 288, 112-423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112423
Fricker, M. (2007). Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford University Press.
Gardiner, S. M. (2012). A perfect moral storm: The ethical tragedy of climate change. Oxford University Press.
Gardiner, S. M., & Fragnière, A. (2018). The Toll of Climate Change: A Call to Ethical Action. Environmental Ethics, 40(3), 187-204. https://doi.org/10.5840/enviroethics201840320
Gardiner, S. M., Caney, S., Jamieson, D., & Shue, H. (2010). Climate Ethics: Essential Readings. Oxford University Press.
Gosseries, A., & Meyer, L. (Eds.). (2012). Intergenerational justice. Oxford University Press.
Government of Japan. (2020). Japan’s Long-term Strategy under the Paris Agreement. Retrieved from https://www.env.go.jp/en/earth/cc/2050_strategy/long_term_strategy_201907.pdf
HM Government. (2020). The Ten Point Plan for a Green Industrial Revolution. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-ten-point-plan-for-a-green-industrial-revolution
INPE. (2020). Monitoring of the Brazilian Amazon Forest by Satellite - Project Prodes. National Institute for Space Research. Retrieved from http://www.obt.inpe.br/OBT/assuntos/programas/amazonia/prodes
IPCC. (2018). Global Warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways. Retrieved from https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/
Jamieson, D. (2014). Reason in a Dark Time: Why the Struggle Against Climate Change Failed — and What It Means for Our Future. Oxford University Press.
KenGen. (2020). Kenya Electricity Generating Company PLC Annual Report and Financial Statements 2020. Retrieved from https://www.kengen.co.ke/index.php/investor-relations/reports/annual-reports.html
Korsgaard, C. M. (2015). The Constitution of Agency: Essays on Practical Reason and Moral Psychology. Oxford University Press.
Marten, A. L., Kopits, E. A., Griffiths, C. W., Newbold, S. C., Guivarch, C., Sussman, F. G., ... & Shindell, D. (2021). The social cost of carbon: Advances in long-term probabilistic projections of population, GDP, emissions, and discount rates. Climate Change Economics, 12(2), 2150004. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2010007821500042
METI. (2021). Annual Report on Energy. Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry. Retrieved from https://www.meti.go.jp/english/report/index.html
Mill, J. S. (1861). Utilitarianism. Parker, Son, and Bourn.
Naess, A. (1989). Ecology, community and lifestyle: Outline of an ecosophy. Cambridge University Press.
Nhamo, G., Ndlela, B., & Nhemachena, C. (2020). The green economy and the blue economy: A growing convergence. Journal of Sustainability, 12(4), 1237. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12041237
Oreskes, N. (2019). Why Trust Science?. Princeton University Press.
Parfit, D. (1984). Reasons and Persons. Clarendon Press.
Shue, H. (2014). Climate justice: Vulnerability and protection. Oxford University Press.
South African Government. (2020). South Africa’s Low-Emission Development Strategy 2050. Retrieved from https://www.environment.gov.za/sites/default/files/reports/southafrica_lowemission_developmentstrategy_december2020.pdf
Sterner, T., & Coria, J. (2012). Policy Instruments for Environmental and Natural Resource Management. RFF Press.
Sugiyama, M., Wada, K., & Kameyama, Y. (2020). Japan's net-zero emissions target: Ambitious or business as usual? Energy Policy, 144, 111661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111661
UK Government. (2019). The Climate Change Act 2008 (2050 Target Amendment) Order 2019. Retrieved from https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukdsi/2019/9780111187654
United States Government. (2021). Nationally Determined Contribution of the United States of America. Retrieved from https://www4.unfccc.int/sites/ndcstaging/PublishedDocuments/United%20States%20of%20America%20First/United%20States%20NDC%20April%2021%202021%20Final.pdf
Ward, J., Bramble, E., & Jones, T. (2021). Evaluating the UK’s climate change act: Looking back and looking forward. Climate Policy, 21(5), 583-599. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2021.1878708
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Charles Ike
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.