Philosophical Perspectives on International Aid and Development
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47941/ijp.2096Keywords:
Ethical Principles, International Development, Capacity-Building, Rights-Based Approach, Sustainable PracticesAbstract
Purpose: The general objective of this study was to explore the philosophical perspectives on international aid and development.
Methodology: The study adopted a desktop research methodology. Desk research refers to secondary data or that which can be collected without fieldwork. Desk research is basically involved in collecting data from existing resources hence it is often considered a low cost technique as compared to field research, as the main cost is involved in executive’s time, telephone charges and directories. Thus, the study relied on already published studies, reports and statistics. This secondary data was easily accessed through the online journals and library.
Findings: The findings reveal that there exists a contextual and methodological gap relating to the philosophical perspectives on international aid and development. Preliminary empirical review revealed that international aid is a moral obligation based on justice and equity, rather than optional generosity. It critiqued the effectiveness and motives of aid distribution, emphasizing the need for strategic approaches that empower recipients and address root causes of poverty. The study highlighted the importance of aligning aid with social justice and human rights, advocating for development that integrates economic, social, and political dimensions. It also called for reevaluating power dynamics in aid relationships, promoting egalitarian partnerships based on mutual respect and shared goals.
Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: Utilitarianism, Deontology and Postcolonial Theory may be used to anchor future studies on the philosophical perspectives on international aid and development. The study recommended that theoretical models of international development incorporate ethical principles such as justice, equity, and human rights, shifting from a purely economic focus to a more inclusive approach. Practitioners were encouraged to engage in continuous ethical reflection, build genuine partnerships with local communities, and prioritize capacity-building initiatives. For policymakers, the study advocated for integrating ethical considerations into development policies, adopting a rights-based approach, and promoting sustainable practices. These recommendations contributed to theoretical discourses by challenging traditional paradigms, provided practical guidelines for more effective interventions, and offered a roadmap for creating ethical and sustainable development policies.
Downloads
References
Appiah, K. A. (2006). Cosmopolitanism: Ethics in a World of Strangers. W.W. Norton & Company.
Arase, D. (2014). Japan's Foreign Aid: Old Continuities and New Directions. Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315857265
Banerjee, A., & Duflo, E. (2011). Poor Economics: A Radical Rethinking of the Way to Fight Global Poverty. PublicAffairs.
Cabral, L., & Weinstock, J. (2010). Brazilian technical cooperation for development: Drivers, mechanics and future prospects. Overseas Development Institute.
Easterly, W. (2014). The Tyranny of Experts: Economists, Dictators, and the Forgotten Rights of the Poor. Basic Books.
FCDO. (2020). Statistics on International Development. UK Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/statistics-on-international-development
Gardiner, S. M. (2011). A Perfect Moral Storm: The Ethical Tragedy of Climate Change. Oxford University Press.
Glennie, J. (2012). Aid effectiveness: From basics to the high politics of aid. Journal of International Development, 24(6), 678-695. doi:10.1002/jid.2850
JICA. (2019). Annual Report. Japan International Cooperation Agency. Retrieved from https://www.jica.go.jp/english/publications/reports/annual/2019/index.html
Kabeer, N. (2015). Gender, poverty, and inequality: a brief history of feminist contributions in the field of international development. Gender & Development, 23(2), 189-205. doi:10.1080/13552074.2015.1062300
Mawdsley, E. (2017). National interests and the paradox of aid. Geography Compass, 11(2), e12307. doi:10.1111/gec3.12307
Moyo, D. (2010). Dead Aid: Why Aid Is Not Working and How There Is a Better Way for Africa. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Nagel, T. (2012). Mortal Questions. Cambridge University Press.
Nussbaum, M. C. (2013). Creating Capabilities: The Human Development Approach. Harvard University Press.
OECD. (2021). Development Co-operation Report 2021: Shaping a Just Digital Transformation. OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/f6d42e12-en
O'Neill, O. (2014). Acting on Principle: An Essay on Kantian Ethics. Cambridge University Press.
Radelet, S. (2015). The Great Surge: The Ascent of the Developing World. Simon & Schuster.
Sachs, J. D. (2015). The Age of Sustainable Development. Columbia University Press.
Singer, P. (2015). The Most Good You Can Do: How Effective Altruism Is Changing Ideas About Living Ethically. Yale University Press.
Spivak, G. C. (1988). Can the Subaltern Speak? In C. Nelson & L. Grossberg (Eds.), Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture (pp. 271-313). University of Illinois Press.
Spivak, G. C. (1988). Can the Subaltern Speak? In C. Nelson & L. Grossberg (Eds.), Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture (pp. 271-313). University of Illinois Press.
UN. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. United Nations. Retrieved from https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda
UNDP. (2016). Human Rights-Based Approach to Development Programming. United Nations Development Programme. Retrieved from https://www.undp.org/publications/human-rights-based-approach-development-programming
USAID. (2020). U.S. Overseas Loans and Grants: Obligations and Loan Authorizations, July 1, 1945–September 30, 2020. United States Agency for International Development. Retrieved from https://www.usaid.gov/open/data/greenbook
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Shelley James
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.