INFLUENCE OF SUPPLIER EVALUATION CRITERIA ON PROCUREMENT PERFORMANCE OF NON-GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS IN KENYA

Authors

  • URBANUS KIOKO MUTISO Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology
  • Dr. GEORGE OCHIRI Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47941/ijscl.326

Keywords:

supplier commitment, supplier financial status, supplier technical expertise, supplier basic profile

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of the study was to assess the influence of supplier evaluation criteria on procurement performance of non-governmental organizations in Kenya with an aim of making recommendations on proper use of supplier evaluation.

Methodology: This research study adopted a descriptive research design approach. The researcher preferred this method because it allowed an in-depth study of the subject.  The target population was 168 heads of procurement. The 2018 NGO coordination board directory has a listing of all the 168 NGO's spread all over the country. The study will combine two methods in its data collection that is, questionnaires and key informant interviews. After data collection, quantitative data was coded using Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) version 20. Data was analyzed through descriptive statistical methods such as means, standard deviation, frequencies and percentage. Inferential analyses were used in relation to correlation analysis and regression analysis to test the relationship between the four explanatory variables and the explained variable.

Results: The independent variables reported R value of .846 indicating that there is perfect relationship between dependent variable and independent variables. R square value of 0.716 which means that 71.6% of the corresponding variation in procurement performance of the non-governmental organizations can be explained or predicted by (supplier commitment to quality,  supplier financial status, supplier technical expertise, supplier basic profile) which indicated that the model fitted the study data. The results of regression analysis revealed that there was a significant positive relationship between dependent variable and independent variable at (β = 1.240), p=0.00 <0.05).

Conclusion: The response rate of the study was 71%. The findings of the study indicated that supplier commitment to quality, supplier financial status, supplier technical expertise and supplier basic profile have a positive relationship with procurement performance of NGO's in Kenya

Contribution to theory, practice and policy: the study recommended that NGO's should embrace supplier evaluation criteria so as to improve procurement performance and further researches should to be carried out in other institutions to find out if the same results can be obtained.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

URBANUS KIOKO MUTISO, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology

Postgraduate Student

Dr. GEORGE OCHIRI, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology

Lecturer

References

Cua, O., McKone, E., & Schroeder, G. (2011). Relationships between implementation of supplier evaluation, JIT, and TPM and manufacturing performance. Journal of Operations Management, 19(6), 675-694.

Dale, B.G. (2013). Managing Quality, Fourth Edition, Hertfordshire: Prentice Hall.

David C.W., & Robert, J.F. (2014). Manufacturing Planning and Control Systems for Supply Chain Management. Mcgraw-Hill Education - Europe

Demirbag, M., Tatoglu, E., Tekinkus, M. & Zaim, S. (2010). An analysis of the relationship between supplier evaluation implementation and organizational performance. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 17(6), 829-847.

Dunn, S. D. (2008). Statistics and Data analysis for the Behavioral Science: Mc Graw Hill

Eriksson, H., & Hansson, J. (2011). "˜The impact of supplier evaluation on financial performance. Measuring Business Excellence, 7(1), 36-50.

Evans, R., & Dean, W. (2008). Total quality: Management, organization and strategy (3rd ed.). Mason: Thompson South-Western.

Ferdows, K (2012).Global Manufacturing Practices - A World-wide Survey of Practice in Production Planning and Control, Elsevier, Amsterdam.

Flynn, B., Sakaribara, S. & Schroeder, R. (2009). "A framework for supplier evaluation research", Journal of Operations Management, 11(4), 339-366.

Government of Kenya. (2010). Kenya Vision 2030: A Globally Competitive and Prosperous Kenya, Nairobi: Government Printers.

Hadavand, S. (2010). Management of Comprehensive Quality in Engineering Educational Programs, Iranian Journal of Engineering Education, 12(4), 27-48.

Hoyer, W., & Hoyer, Y. (2010). Implementation of Supplier evaluation in Small Organizations: A Case Study in Sweden. Supplier evaluation, 12(8), 988-994.

Isaac, S., & Michael, W.B. (2008). Handbook in Research and Evaluation for Education and the Behavioral Sciences. Macdonald and Evans, Ohio. U.S.A

ISO (2008). "˜Supplier evaluation and quality assurance-Vocabulary, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva.

John, G & Johnson, P. (2012). Research methods for Managers, 4th Edition. Sage Publications: London.

Joiner, T. (2012). Supplier evaluation and performance: the role of organization support and co-worker support. International journal of quality & reliability management, 24(6), 617-627.

Kakwezi, P., & Nyeko, S., (2010). Procurement Processes and Performance: Efficiency and Effectiveness of the Procurement Function: Makerere University Press, Kampala.

KAM (2014). Kenya manufacturers and exporters directory. Nairobi: KAM.

Kaynak, H. (2010). The relationship between supplier evaluation and their effects on firm performance. Journal of Operations Management, 21(4), 405-435.

Kazemi, M., & Hooshyar, V. (2009). Determining the Readiness Levels of University Chancellors to Use supplier evaluation- Case Study: A State University; Higher Education Magazine, 31(7), 85-108.

Kenneth, Lysons, Brian & Farrington, (2011). Purchasing and Supply Chain Management: Seventh Edition, Person Education Limited.

KIPPRA. (2010). The Demographic Governance Support Programme (DGSP). Nairobi: KIPPRA.

Kirungu, K.H. (2012). An Investigation of Possible Constraints to Efficient Management Of the Supply Chain in Government Hospitals. A Case Study for Kenyatta National Hospital. Mombasa: Government Training Institute.

KNBS (2008). National Service Delivery Survey Report. Nairobi: Kenya National Bureau of Statistics.

Kombo, D. & Tromp, D. (2010). Project and Thesis Writing, an introduction. Nairobi: Pauline Publications Africa.

Kothari, C.R. (2008). Research Methodology; Methods & Techniques (2nd ed.). New Delhi; New Age International Press Limited.

Lai, M. (2008). An investigation into the relationship between supplier evaluation and hospital performance in Taiwan Public Hospital, Paper presented at the Thirty Second Annual meeting of the Western Decision Science Institute, Hawaii.

Larry, H. (2013). Advanced Statistics in Research: Reading, Understanding, and Writing Up Data Analysis Results. Publisher: Shadow Finch Media LLC

Lee, M., Rho, H., & Lee, S. (2009). Impact of Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award criteria on organizational quality performance. International Journal of Production Research, 41(9), 2003-2020.

Malik, A., Iqbal, Z., Shaukat, R., & Yong, J. (2010). Supplier evaluation and organizational performance: Evidence from Pakistani SMEs, International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 10(4), 26-31.

Mann & Zhang (2010). Some cultural/geographical styles in quality strategies and quality costs (P.R. China versus Australia), International Journal of Production Economics, 41(5), 81-92.

Masters, R. J. (2009). Overcoming the barriers to supplier evaluation's success, International Journal of Quality Progress, 29(5), 53-55.

Mugenda, O., & Mugenda, A. (2012). Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Nairobi: Africa Centre for Technology Studies.

Ngechu, M. (2009). Understanding the Research Process and Methods. An Introduction to Research Methods. Acts press, Nairobi.

Nikzad-Zeidi, M., & Tayebi, M. (2012). The Effect of supplier evaluation establishment on customer Satisfaction Aiming at Sustainable Development. 13(3), 99-104.

Nwabueze, U. (2008). An industry betrayed: the case of supplier evaluation in manufacturing, The supplier evaluation journal, 13(6), 400-408.

Nyeko, P. K. (2008). Procurement Processes and Performance: Efficiency and Effectiveness of the Procurement Function.

Oakland, J. (2010). Supplier evaluation (2ed). Oxford, Great Britain: Butterworth-Heinemann.

Orodho .C. R. (2009). Element of Education and Social Sciences. Research Methods 2nd Edition, Kanezja Publishers. New Delhi

Phu-Van, H. (2011). An empirical study supplier evaluation approach to information system development process (Unpublished doctorate's dissertation). Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Virginia, USA.

PPOA. (2007). Assessing Procurement Systems in Kenya Report. Nairobi: Public Oversight Authority.

Republic of Kenya (2013). Ministry of Planning and National Development, the National Economic and Social Council and the Office of the President.

Robbins, S. & Coulter, M. (2009). "Foundations of management", Frenchs Forest, NSW: Pearson Education.

Rotich, L. M. (2011). Influence of Planning on Procurement Performance in the Kenya, International Journal of Human Resource and Research Publication, 12(4), 289-292.

Rouse, M. (2009). Definition of supplier evaluation, Related glossary terms. Updated September

Samuel, O. L. (2009). Supplier evaluation System of Uniliver Ghana Limited (Unpublished doctorate's dissertation). St. Clement University, Turks and Caicos Island.

Saunders, M. Lewis, P & Hill, T. (2008). Research Methods for Business Students, 3rdedition. England: Prentice hall.

Seleim, A. (2010). Knowledge Management and Organizational Performance in Egyptian Software Firms. International Journal of Knowledge Management, 3(4), 29-48.

Sha'ri, M. Y. & Elaine, A. (2010). Supplier evaluation implementation issues: review and cases. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 20(6), 634-655.

Shirima, D. L. (2008). Value for Money Through Reduced Procurement Transaction Costs and Improved Efficiency. Tanzania Procurement Journal, 3(4), 44-52.

Smith, A.K. (2013). Supplier evaluation in the public sector. Quality Progress Publishers, 3rd edition, Lagos, Nigeria.

Tari, J., Molina, J., & Castejun, J. (2010). The relationship between supplier evaluation and their effects on quality outcomes. European Journal of Operational Research, 183(7), 483-501.

Wanyama, J. (2013). The effectiveness of the Procurement Regulations in Kenya. Nairobi: Pr Academics Press.

Witjaksono, A. (2012). The difference of supplier evaluation and organization performance between supplier evaluation firms and non-supplier evaluation firms, 2nd conference on management, Economics and social science 4(2), 139-143.

World Bank (2013). "Reducing Supply Chain Barriers Could Increase Global GDP Up To 6 Times More Than Removing All Import Tariffs Report", Switzerland.

Yong, J., & Wilkinson, A. (2010). Rethinking supplier evaluation. Supplier evaluation Journal., 12(8), 247-258.

Downloads

Published

2019-09-19

How to Cite

MUTISO, U. K., & OCHIRI, D. G. (2019). INFLUENCE OF SUPPLIER EVALUATION CRITERIA ON PROCUREMENT PERFORMANCE OF NON-GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS IN KENYA. International Journal of Supply Chain and Logistics, 3(3), 77–98. https://doi.org/10.47941/ijscl.326

Issue

Section

Articles