Performance Appraisal Practices and Teacher Performance in Public Secondary Schools in Kenya: A Case of Busia County

Authors

  • Pamela Naswa Khaemba Kibabii University
  • Prof. Julius Kiprop Maiyo Kibabii University
  • Prof. Muganda Munir Manini Kibabii University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47941/jep.2219

Keywords:

Performance Appraisal, Teacher Performance, Target Setting, Performance Gaps, Teaching Standards

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of the study was to investigate the relationship between performance appraisal practices and teacher performance in Busia County, Kenya. The Systems theory and the Ability-Motivation-Opportunity (AMO) theory informed this study.

Methodology: The study was anchored on a pragmatic paradigm and adopted a mixed methods approach. The study targeted 185 public secondary schools in Busia County. The study categorized respondents into 3 strata: Principals, Mathematics Head of Department (HODs) and County Director of Education (CDE). Simple random sampling was then utilized to select samples from each stratum. Schools were clustered based on 7 Sub- Counties in Busia County. The sample size of the study was 126 HODs, 19 Principals and 1 CDE. Questionnaires and interview schedules were used to collect data. Piloting was conducted in 37 schools to refine instruments. Thematic analysis was applied in the analysis of qualitative data. Data analysis and interpretation was based on descriptive statistics such as frequencies, percentages, mean, standard deviation and inferential statistics such as correlation and regressions.

Findings: The findings of the study was that there is a statistically significant relationship between performance appraisal and teacher performance (r = 0.440, p<0.05), hence the study rejected the null hypothesis. The study concluded that a unit improvement in performance appraisal is likely to result to an improvement in the teacher performance by 44% (b = 0.440, t= 0.855, p<0.05). The study holds substantial academic and policy implications.

Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: The findings contribute to the understanding of the complex relationships between performance appraisal practices and teacher performance. The study provides actionable insights for education managers, empowering them to take strategic measures to address performance gaps and improve teaching standards in the unique setting of public secondary schools in Kenya. By understanding the dynamics between performance appraisal practices and teacher performance, educational institutions can tailor strategies to optimize the effectiveness of their teaching staff in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics STEM subjects.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Pamela Naswa Khaemba, Kibabii University

Department of Education Planning and Management

Prof. Julius Kiprop Maiyo, Kibabii University

Department of Education Planning and Management

Prof. Muganda Munir Manini, Kibabii University

Department of Economics, Finance and Accounting

References

Abakunda, J. Ungwu, J. N. Kule, J., Silaji, T. & Kamami, W. (2023). Navigating Global Challenges in Teacher Performance: Strategies and implications. INOSR Arts and Humanities 9(2): 1-9 https://Kiu.ac.ug

Al-Jedaia, Y., & Mehrez, A. (2020). The effect of performance appraisal on job performance in governmental sector: The mediating role of motivation. Management Science Letters, 10(9), 2077- 2088.

Al- Mahdi, O. Purinto, T. (2022). Global perspective on Teacher Performance Improvement. Advance in Higher Education and Professional Development. Nytrykk IGI. Global 2022 ISBN 1799892808-302 sider

Alsuwaidi, M., Alshurideh, M., Kurdi, B. A., & Salloum, S. A. (2020). Performance appraisal on employees’ motivation: A comprehensive analysis. In International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Systems and Informatics (pp. 681-693). Springer, Cham.

Anderson, J., & Clark, A. (2019). An investigation into the impact of performance appraisal on teacher competencies. Educational Psychology Review, 32(4), 489-504.

Bertalanyffy, L. Von. (1956). General Systems Theory and Psychiatry: In S. Arieti (Ed.). American Hand book of Psychiatry, Vol. 3. New York, NY: Basic books.

Bergman, M. M. (2008). Advances in Mixed Methods Research. Continuum. (Ed.)

Best, J. W. & Khan, J. V. (2006). Research in Education .10th ed. Boston; Pearson Education Inc

Biddle, C., & Schafft, K. A. (2015). Axiology and anomaly in the practice of mixed methods work: Pragmatism, valuation, and the transformative paradigm. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 9, 320-334

Breweton, P. & Millward, L. (2001). Organizational Research Methods. London, England: Sage.

Brown, C., O’Kane, P. & McCracken, M. (2020). Longitudinal study on performance appraisal and teacher competencies. Journal of Educational Leadership, 38(2), 176-192.

Busia County Education Office (2023). Task Force Annual Report on Analysis of County KCSE National Examinations results and analysis from 2018 -2022. Unpublished Report. Ministry of Education, Kenya

Choong, K. K., & Islam, S. M. (2020). A new approach to performance measurement using standards: a case of translating strategy to operations. Operations Management Research, 13(3), 137-170.

Clarke, P. (2022). Education Reform and the Learning Crisis in Developing Countries: Cambridge University Press

Cochran, W. G. (1963). Sampling Techniques, 2nd Ed. New York. John Wiley and Sons. Inc.

Collier, J. E. (2020). Applied structural equation modeling using AMOS: Basic to advanced techniques. Routledge.

Creswell, J. W. & Clark, P. (2011). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, Qantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage publications

Engellant, K. Holland, D. & Pipe, R. (2016). Assessing Convergent and Discriminant Validity of the motivation Construct for the technology integration Education (TIE) Model. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice vol. 16 pp 37-50

Guest, G. Bunce, A. & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18 (10, 59 – 82

Hall, R. F. (2013). Mixed methods: In search of a paradigm. In T. Le, & Q. Le (Eds.), Conducting research in a changing and challenging world (pp. 71-78). New York: Nova Science Publishers Inc

Henseler, J. (2017). Partial Least Squares Path Modeling. (Eds), Advanced Methods for Modeling Markets, Springer, Hedelberg, Germany pp. 361- 381

Johnson, B., & Christensen, L. (2012). Educational research: quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage publications

Kagiri & Wambugu (2017). Performance Appraisal Frameworks and Teacher Performance: Insights from Kenyan Schools. Journal of Educational Administration and Leadership.

Kamau, L. N. (2019). Impact of Teacher Performance Appraisal on Teaching and Learning in Secondary Schools in Maara Sub County Tharaka Nithi County, Kenya. Unpublished Masters of Educational Management, Chuka University

Kamble, S. S., Gunasekaran, A., Ghadge, A., & Raut, R. (2020). A performance measurement system for industry 4.0 enabled smart manufacturing system in SMMEs-A review and empirical investigation. International journal of production economics, 229, 107853.

KNEC (2023). Kenya National Examination Council. The year 2023 Kenya Certificate of Secondary Education examination report, Nairobi, Kenya.

Krejcie, R. V. & Morgan D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Pyschological Measurement vol 30; pp 607- 610.

KUCCPS (2022). The essential Career Guidance: Making an informed Choice. Nairobi; Kenya Literature Bureau

Lohse, S. (2017). Pragmatism, ontology, and philosophy of the social sciences in practice. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 47, 3-27

Lovell, C. A. K. (2022). Productivity Measurement: Past, Present, and Future. In Advances in Economic Measurement (pp. 3-103). Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore.

Martin, J. (2018). UNICEF Think Piece. Education Series: Teacher Performance. UNICEF Eastern and Southern Africa Regional Office, Nairobi

MOEST, (2023). Ministry of Education Science and Technology. Basic Education Statistical Booklet. The Republic of Kenya. The Government Printer. Nairobi, Kenya.

Molina-Azorin, J. F. (2016). Mixed methods research: An opportunity to improve our studies and our research skills. European Journal of Management and Business Economics, 25, 37-38.

Morgan, D. L. (2014). Pragmatism as a paradigm for Social Research. Qualitative Inquiry vol. 20 pp 1045- 1053

Morgan, D. L. (2014). Integrating Qualitative and Quantitative Methods. A Pragmatic Approach. Thousand Oaks: Sage

Mushi & Madzorera (2019). Performance Appraisal Practices and Teacher Performance: A Case Study in Tanzania. International Journal of Educational Management

Nkurunziza & Musinguzi (2018). Contextual Factors Shaping the Implementation and Impact of Performance Appraisal on Teacher Performance in Rwanda. Journal of Education Policy

Nwaka, N.G. & Ofojebe, W. N (2020). Strategies for coping with Shortage of Resources in Primary School Administration in Anambra State. Journal of Education Leadership,1 (1), 29-36.

Sack, H. (2020). Rensis likert and the likert scale Method. Scitti Blog. Retrieved from https://scihi.org/resisis-likert.

Santos, P. M. & Cirillo , M. A. (2021). Construction of Avarage Variance Extracted Index for Construct Validation in Structural Equation Models with adaptive Regressions. Communication in Statistics- Simulation and Computation, 52 (40, 1639- 1650. DOI: http/doi.org/10.1080/036109118.2021.1888122

Shannon-Baker, P. (2016). Making paradigms meaningful in mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 10, 319-334

Shorten, a. & Smith, J. (2017). Mixed Method Research: Expanding the evidence the evidence base. Evid Based Nurs, vol 20, pp 74 – 75

Smith, J., & Johnson, R. (2018). "Performance Appraisal and Teacher Competencies: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis." Journal of Educational Administration, 36(4), 431-450.

TSC Act (2012). The Republic of Kenya. TSC Act No. 20. Nairobi: Government Printer.

TSC (2020). Teacher Performance Appraisal and Development Report for Consultancy Contract No. MOE/GPE/CQS/01/2020/2021. Submitted by University of Nairobi Enterprise and Service Limited. Nairobi, Kenya.

TSC (2018). The Republic of Kenya. Performance, Recognition, Reward and Sanction Policy Framework for Teaching Service. Nairobi. Government Printer

Tumusiime, P., Mwalw’a, S. & Okemasisi, K. (2021). Principals’ Implementation of Teacher Performance Appraisal and Development (Tpad) Tool and Teachers’ Performance In Public Secondary Schools In Kikuyu Constituency. African Journal of Emerging Issues 3(4) 1- 22

UNESCO (2018). Education for All global monitoring report: Teaching and Learning, achieving quality for all. Paris: UNESCO

UNESCO (2016). Education for People and Planet: Creating Sustainable Future for all. UNESCO

UNICEF (2018). Think Piece Education Series. Improving Quality Education and Children’s Learning Outcomes and Effective practices in the Eastern and Southern Africa Region, Nairobi.

Yamane, T. (1967). Elementary Sampling Theory. Prentice Inc. Englewood Cliffs. NS, USA Vol. 1, 371- 3

Downloads

Published

2024-09-03

How to Cite

Khaemba, P. N., Maiyo, J. K. M., & Manini, M. M. (2024). Performance Appraisal Practices and Teacher Performance in Public Secondary Schools in Kenya: A Case of Busia County. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(6), 88–105. https://doi.org/10.47941/jep.2219

Issue

Section

Articles