Economic Systems and Youth Participation in County Governance in Kenya
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47941/hrlj.3750Keywords:
Economic Systems, Youth Participation, County Governance Collaboration, Governance TheoryAbstract
Purpose: The general objective of the study was to examine the influence of economic systems on youth participation in county governance in Kenya.
Methodology: The study was based on Collaborative Governance Theory. A survey research design was adopted in the study. The study population comprised of the estimated 19,456,356 youths from all the counties in Kenya. The sample size for the study was 400 respondents and they were identified to participate in the research using proportionate stratified and simple sampling techniques respondents. Questionnaires and interview guides were used in the collection of relevant data. Data was analysed and presented using the SPSS software and spread sheets. The study collected both qualitative and quantitative data. Qualitative data was analysed using content analysis. The study adopted a descriptive and inferential statistics to analyse quantitative data to establish the relationship between the independent variables and dependent variables. The findings were presented in tables, figures and charts.
Findings: The study findings revealed economic systems had a statistical significance relationship with the youth participation.
Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: Kenyan counties should consider implementing reforms in their economic systems to promote economic growth and development. These reforms could include measures to reduce income inequality, increase access to economic opportunities, and stimulate job creation. A stronger and more equitable economy is likely to positively influence youth participation in governance. County governments should develop economic policies that specifically target the needs and aspirations of the youth population. These policies could involve job creation programs, access to credit, and incentives for youth-led enterprises. By tailoring economic policies to address the concerns and goals of the youth, their participation in governance is likely to increase.
Downloads
References
Aandstad, A., & Simon, E. V. (2013).Reliability and validity of the soccer specific INTER field test.Journal of sports sciences, 31(13), 1383-1392.
Abdumlingo, H., &Mwirigi, M. F. (2014). Challenges of managing devolved funds in the delivery of services: A case study of Mombasa county. International journal of research in commerce & management, 5(5), 1-4.
Dahl, R. A. (1990). After the revolution?: authority in a good society. Yale University Press.
Defee, C., Williams, B., Randall, W. S., & Thomas, R. (2010). An inventory of theory in logistics and SCM research. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 21(3), 404-489.
De la Cruz, M. R. (2015). The nation state at a crossroads?: Reflections on multi-level governance. ApuntesElectorales, (13).
Denhardt, J. V., &Denhardt, R. B. (2015).The new public service: Serving, not steering. Routledge.
Ferrazzi, G., &Rohdewohld, R. (2017).Emerging Practices in Intergovernmental Functional Assignment.Taylor & Francis.
Filippetti, A., &Sacchi, A. (2013). Fiscal Decentralization and Economic Growth Reconsidered: The Role of the Institutional Setting.
Gathenya,J., Kihoro. J., &Mwangi, J. K. (2018). Influence Of Leadership Development Training On Performance Of The National Police Service In Kenya. Strategic Journal Of Business & Change Management, 5(1).
Gathitu, K. A. (2016). Separation Of Powers Under The 2010 Constitution: An Analysis Of The Emerging Tensions Between Parliament And The Judiciary (Doctoral Dissertation, University Of Nairobi).
Garg, G., & Kothari, C. R. (2014).Research Methodology.Methods and Techniques.New Age International Publishers.New Delhi-110002.
Gaynor, N. (2013). Decentralisation, Conflict and Peacebuilding in Rwanda.
Gemmell, N., Kneller, R., &Sanz, I. (2013). Fiscal decentralization and economic growth: spending versus revenue decentralization. Economic Inquiry, 51(4), 1915-1931.
Hasnain, Z. (2008). The Politics of Service Delivery in Pakistan: Political Parties and the Incentives for Patronage, 1988-1999. The Pakistan Development Review, 129-151.
Hasselskog, M. (2016, May). Participation or what? Local experiences and perceptions of household performance contracting in Rwanda.In Forum for Development Studies (Vol. 43, No. 2, pp. 177-199).Routledge.
Haurovi, M. (2012).The role of cooperative government and intergovernmental relations in promoting effective service delivery.A case study of the Amatole district municipality (Doctoral dissertation, University of Fort Hare).
Héritier, A. (2010). Intergovernmental decisions and multi-level governance: producing patchwork policies. Governance and Intergovernmental Relations in the European Union and the United States: Theoretical Perspectives, 186.
Jennings, M. K., & Niemi, R. G. (2014). Generations and politics: A panel study of young adults and their parents (Vol. 68). Princeton University Press.
Karakire, G. P. (2012). Three Decades of Orthodox Approaches to Administrative Reform in Africa: the Ugandan Experience. Working Paper. Kampala: African Center for Management and Leadership. Available at www//ssrn. com/abstract= 2097123.
Lambright, G. (2014). Opposition politics and urban service delivery in Kampala, Uganda.Development Policy Review, 32(s1).
Langford, M., Cousins, B., Dugard, J., & Madlingozi, T. (Eds.). (2013). Socio-economic Rights in South Africa: Symbols Or Substance?. Cambridge University Press.
Laryea-Adjei, G. Q. M. (2006). Central-Local Relations in the Provision of Basic Services: Provision of water and sanitation services in Ghana.
Mandeli, K. N. (2016). New public governance in Saudi cities: An empirical assessment of the quality of the municipal system in Jeddah. Habitat International, 51, 114-123.
March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1983). The new institutionalism: Organizational factors in political life. American political science review, 78(3), 734-749.
Nhlabathi, Z. F., &Mubangizi, B. C. (2012). The Kwanaloga Games of Kwazulu-Natal: A case study of intergovernmental relations and lessons for developmental local government. AdministratioPublica, 20(3), 55-70.
Opiyo, S., Guyo, W., Moronge, M., &Odhiambo, R. (2017).Role of Conflict Management as an Essential Element of Public Participation in Enhancing Performance of Devolved Governance Systems in Kenya.
Osborne, D. en T. Gaebler (1992).Reinventing Government: How the Entrepeneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector.
Vromen, A., & Collin, P. (2012). Everyday youth participation? Contrasting views from Australian policymakers and young people. Young, 18(1), 97-112.
Wachira, K. (2010). Fiscal Decentralization: Fostering or Retarding National Development in Kenya. Mwenda, AK ed, 75-108.
Wagana, D. M. (2017).Effect of Governance Decentralization on Service Delivery in County Governments in Kenya (Doctoral dissertation, COHRED, JKUAT).
Zulu, T. S. S. (2014). Cooperative Governance in South Africa: A Case Study of Intergovernmental Relations in the Provision of Housing (Doctoral dissertation, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Muya Ngigi Moses, Prof. Wario Guyo, Dr. Makori Moronge
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
