Effect of Interfaith Dialogue Programs on Social Cohesion in Multi-Religious Communities: Evidence from the Netherlands
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47941/ijcrs.3824Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this article was to analyze effect of interfaith dialogue programs on social cohesion in multi-religious communities: evidence from the Netherlands.
Methodology: This study adopted a desk methodology. A desk study research design is commonly known as secondary data collection. This is basically collecting data from existing resources preferably because of its low cost advantage as compared to a field research. Our current study looked into already published studies and reports as the data was easily accessed through online journals and libraries.
Findings: Interfaith dialogue programs in the Netherlands have a generally positive but moderate effect on social cohesion in multi-religious communities. Evidence shows that participation in structured dialogue improves trust, reduces prejudice, and strengthens cooperation between religious groups, especially when engagement is continuous and inclusive. However, the impact varies depending on participation intensity, education level, and urban–rural context, with stronger effects among highly engaged and educated participants. Overall, while interfaith dialogue does not eliminate religious tensions, it significantly contributes to improved mutual understanding and gradual strengthening of social cohesion.
Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: Intergroup contact theory, social capital theory & social identity theory may be used to anchor future studies on the effect of interfaith dialogue programs on social cohesion in multi-religious communities: evidence from the Netherlands. Interfaith dialogue program designers should prioritize sustained and structured engagement rather than one-off events, as repeated interaction produces stronger trust outcomes. Policy frameworks in the Netherlands should formally integrate interfaith dialogue into national cohesion and integration strategies, recognizing it as a preventive tool against religious polarization.
Downloads
References
Bokányi, E., Kazmina, Y., Heemskerk, E. M., & Takes, F. W. (2026). Fragmentation of a longitudinal population-scale social network: Decreasing network closure in the Netherlands. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.00234
Dukes, T., & Musterd, S. (2021). Towards social cohesion: Bridging national integration rhetoric and local practice in the Netherlands. Urban Studies, 49(9), 1981–1997. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098012444889
Kerk in Actie. (2026). Shared Futures: Interfaith cooperation in the Netherlands. Protestant Church in the Netherlands. https://kerkinactie.protestantsekerk.nl
McKenna, S., Lee, E., Klik, K. A., Markus, A., Hewstone, M., & Reynolds, K. J. (2018). Are diverse societies less cohesive? Testing contact and mediated contact theories. PLOS ONE, 13(3), e0193337. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193337
McKenna, S., Lee, E., Klik, K. A., Markus, A., Hewstone, M., & Reynolds, K. J. (2018). Are diverse societies less cohesive? Testing contact and mediated contact theories. PLOS ONE, 13(3), e0193337. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193337
Neya, A. K. (2025). Interfaith dialogue as a framework for social cohesion and sustainable development. NEYA Global Publishing. https://doi.org/10.64357/neya-gjnps-int-fr-dg-01
OECD. (2020). How’s Life? 2020: Measuring well-being. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9870c393-en
OECD. (2023). Society at a Glance 2023: OECD social indicators. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/1999124x
OECD. (2024). Society at a Glance 2024: OECD social indicators. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/918d8db3-en
Office for National Statistics. (2020). Social capital in the UK. https://www.ons.gov.uk
Pew Research Center. (2020). Social trust in advanced economies. https://www.pewresearch.org
Pew Research Center. (2025). Americans’ trust in one another. https://www.pewresearch.org
Social Mobility Commission. (2025). Level of trust, fairness and helpfulness in the UK. UK Government Publications. https://social-mobility.data.gov.uk
Van Assche, J., Ardaya, S., Van Hiel, A., & Roets, A. (2023). Trust is in the eye of the beholder: How perceptions of diversity shape social cohesion. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1036646. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1036646
Verkuyten, M., Yogeeswaran, K., Mepham, K., & Sprong, S. (2020). Interculturalism and intergroup relations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 50(3), 505–519. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2628
Verkuyten, M., Yogeeswaran, K., Mepham, K., & Sprong, S. (2023). Maintaining a tolerant national identity and intergroup acceptance. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 53, 1027–1039. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12993
Versantvoort, M. (2023). Religie en sociale cohesie in Nederland. Religie & Samenleving, 20(3). https://doi.org/10.54195/RS.25015
Visser, H. J., Liefbroer, A. I., & Schoonmade, L. J. (2024). Evaluating the learning outcomes of interfaith initiatives: A systematic review. Journal of Beliefs & Values, 45(4), 689–712. https://doi.org/10.1080/13617672.2023.2196486
Ziller, C., & Spörlein, C. (2020). Residential segregation and social trust in the Netherlands. Frontiers in Sociology, 5, 45. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2020.00045
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Julia Jansen
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
