Coping With Urban Water Insecurity in a Post-Conflict Setting: Household Strategies in Juba City, South Sudan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47941/ijhss.3944Keywords:
Coping strategies, Household water insecurity, Post - conflict cities, Urban resilience, Juba City, South SudanAbstract
Purpose: This study examined the coping strategies adopted by households experiencing inadequate access to clean and safe water in Juba City, South Sudan, focusing on their perceived effectiveness, implementation challenges and long-term sustainability.
Methodology: The study adopted a qualitative research design. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 31 household heads, eight key informant interviews, six focus group discussions involving 46 participants and direct observations across Munuki, Juba and Kator payams. Participants were selected using purposive, convenience and critical-case sampling, while the data were analysed through thematic content analysis.
Findings: The study identified five principal coping strategies: treating water through boiling, chlorination and filtration; using alternative sources such as boreholes, streams, rainwater, vendors and bottled water; rationing and reusing water; increasing household storage and sharing water with neighbours; and promoting household and community awareness of water safety and conservation. Although these practices helped households manage immediate shortages, their effectiveness and sustainability were constrained by treatment and fuel costs, uncertain water quality, inadequate storage, health risks associated with water reuse, unequal household resources and weakening reciprocal-sharing arrangements.
Unique Contribution to Theory, Policy and Practice: The study extends the application of Stress and Coping Theory to urban water insecurity by distinguishing short-term household coping from supported and sustainable adaptation in a post-conflict setting. It provides policy evidence for affordable water treatment, regulated water supply, safe storage, rainwater harvesting and targeted assistance to vulnerable households. In practice, it demonstrates that household and community initiatives can strengthen resilience but cannot substitute for reliable, affordable and safely managed public water services.
Downloads
References
1. Miller JD, Workman CL, Panchang SV, Sneegas G, Adams EA, et al. (2021) Water security and nutrition: Current knowledge and research opportunities. Advances in Nutrition 12(6): 2525–2539. doi:10.1093/advances/nmab075.
2. Gunda T, Hess D, Hornberger GM, Worland S (2019) Water security in practice: The quantity-quality-society nexus. Water Security 6: 100022.
3. African Development Bank (2013) South Sudan: An Infrastructure Action Plan—A Program for Sustained Strong Economic Growth. African Development Bank Group, pp. 15–313.
4. Borgomeo E, Chase C, Godoy NS, Kwadwo VO (2023) Water security in South Sudan. In: Rising from the Depths: Water Security and Fragility in South Sudan, pp. 11–56. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1943-8_ch2.
5. Achore M, Bisung E, Kuusaana ED (2020) Coping with water insecurity at the household level: A synthesis of qualitative evidence. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health 230: 113598.
6. Boying HH, Ping F, Yateh M, Collins M, Gore EW, et al. (2020) Sustainable drinking water security strategic plan: A case study of Juba, South Sudan. International Journal of Scientific Advances 2(2). doi:10.51542/ijscia.v2i2.12.
7. Amit RK, Sasidharan S (2019) Measuring affordability of access to clean water: A coping cost approach. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 141: 410–417. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.11.003.
8. Scott CA, Shrestha PP, Lutz-Ley AN (2020) The re-adaptation challenge: Limits and opportunities of existing infrastructure and institutions in adaptive water governance. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 44: 104–112. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.09.012.
9. Lazarus RS, Folkman S (1984) Stress, Appraisal, and Coping. Springer, New York.
10. Gore EWJ, Wu H, Tang Y (2020) Assessment of drinking water system: A case study of Juba City, South Sudan. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications 10(10). doi:10.29322/IJSRP.10.10.2020.p10642.
11. Bior KB (2018) Assessing Clean Drinking Water Availability in Juba, South Sudan. Study report.
12. Gore EWJ, Tang Y, Boying HH (2021) Evaluation of rural household drinking water treatment: A case study of Rajaf Payam, Central Equatoria State, Juba-South Sudan. International Journal of Scientific Advances 2(2): 168–176. doi:10.51542/ijscia.v2i2.16.
13. Shimamura Y, Shimizutani S, Taguchi S, Yamada H (2022) The impact of better access to improved water sources on health, schooling, and water collection of girls and boys in rural Zambia. Journal of Development Studies 58(9): 1750–1771. doi:10.1080/00220388.2022.2048650.
14. Mohajan HK (2018) Qualitative research methodology in social sciences and related subjects. Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People 7(1): 23–48.
15. Suri H (2011) Purposeful sampling in qualitative research synthesis. Qualitative Research Journal 11(2): 63–75.
16. Etikan I, Musa SA, Alkassim RS (2016) Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics 5(1): 1–4. doi:10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11.
17. Krause MS (2016) Case sampling for psychotherapy practice, theory and policy guidance: Qualities and quantities. Psychotherapy Research 26(5): 530–544. doi:10.1080/10503307.2015.1051161.
18. Osborne N, Grant-Smith D (2021) In-depth interviewing. In: Methods in Urban Analysis, pp. 105–125. Springer, Singapore. doi:10.1007/978-981-16-1677-8_7.
19. Khatun F, Saadat SY (2020) Focus group discussion. In: Youth Employment in Bangladesh: Creating Opportunities—Reaping Dividends, pp. 77–88. Springer. doi:10.1007/978-981-15-1750-1_6.
20. Abbas R, Riecken T, Seymour J, Le Tran MA (2017) Data collection 1: Observations and document analysis—Who’s looking? In: Qualitative Research and Intercultural Understanding, pp. 38–47. Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315113685-5.
21. Huxley K (2020) Content analysis, quantitative. In: The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design. SAGE Publications. doi:10.4135/9781526421036880564.
22. Braun V, Clarke V (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3(2): 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
23. Noble H, Heale R (2019) Triangulation in research, with examples. Evidence-Based Nursing 22(3): 67–68. doi:10.1136/ebnurs-2019-103145.
24. Reid AM, Brown JM, Smith JM, Cope AC, Jamieson S (2018) Ethical dilemmas and reflexivity in qualitative research. Perspectives on Medical Education 7: 69–75. doi:10.1007/s40037-018-0412-2.
25. Gizaw Z, Gebrehiwot M, Destaw B, Nigusie A (2022) Access to basic drinking water services, safe water storage and household water treatment practice in rural communities of northwest Ethiopia. Scientific Reports 12(1): 20623. doi:10.1038/s41598-022-25001-y.
26. Bolaane B, Tema N, Phuthologo B (2021) Barriers and coping strategies of households with no access to drinking water and waterborne sanitation in two low-income neighbourhoods in Botswana. Habitat International 115: 102372. doi:10.1016/j.habitatint.2021.102372.
27. Cominola A, Preiss L, Thyer M, Maier HR, Prevos P, et al. (2023) The determinants of household water consumption: A review and assessment framework for research and practice. npj Clean Water 6(1): 11. doi:10.1038/s41545-022-00208-8.
28. Wutich A, Budds J, Jepson W, Harris LM, Adams E, et al. (2018) Household water sharing: A review of water gifts, exchanges and transfers across cultures. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water 5(6): e1309. doi:10.1002/wat2.1309.
29. Hutchings P, Chan MY, Cuadrado L, Ezbakhe F, Mesa B, et al. (2015) A systematic review of success factors in the community management of rural water supplies over the past 30 years. Water Policy 17(5): 963–983. doi:10.2166/wp.2015.128.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 James Arike Charles Duku
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
