Effect of Instructor Social Presence on Learner Persistence in Online Undergraduate Courses: The Mediating Role of Academic Belonging in South Africa

Authors

  • Elizabeth Phiri University of Cape Town

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47941/jodl.3508

Keywords:

Instructor Presence, Online Learning

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this article was to analyze the effect of instructor social presence on learner persistence in online undergraduate courses: the mediating role of academic belonging.

Methodology: This study adopted a desk methodology. A desk study research design is commonly known as secondary data collection. This is basically collecting data from existing resources preferably because of its low cost advantage as compared to a field research. Our current study looked into already published studies and reports as the data was easily accessed through online journals and libraries.

Findings: Instructor social presence significantly increases learner persistence in online undergraduate courses by improving interaction, motivation, and engagement. The effect occurs primarily through academic belonging, where students who feel connected and valued are more likely to complete and re-enroll in courses. Therefore, strengthening instructor communication and support mechanisms reduces withdrawal and enhances retention in online learning environments.

Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: Community of inquiry (COI) theory, self-determination theory & student integration theory may be used to anchor future studies on the effect of instructor social presence on learner persistence in online undergraduate courses: the mediating role of academic belonging. At the institutional and instructional level, the study emphasizes that improving retention requires deliberate relational teaching rather than only technological investment. From a policy perspective, the findings suggest that quality assurance frameworks for online education should include measurable instructor engagement standards rather than focusing solely on infrastructure and content delivery.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al-dheleai, Y. M. H., Tasir, Z., Harun, J., & Shukor, N. A. (2019). Web 2.0 for fostering students’ social presence in online learning-based interaction. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 9(1), 13–19. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.552

Fiock, H. S. (2020). Designing a community of inquiry in online courses. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 21(1), 134-152.

Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2-3), 87-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6

Glazier, R. A., & Skurat Harris, H. (2021). Instructor presence and student satisfaction across modalities: Survey data on student preferences in online and on-campus courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 22(3), 77–98. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v22i3.5546

Lammers, W. J., & Gillaspy, J. A., Jr. (2013). Brief measure of student–instructor rapport predicts student success in online courses. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 7(2), Article 16. https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2013.070216

Lee, Y., & Choi, J. (2011). A review of online course dropout research: Implications for practice and future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59(5), 593–618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-010-9177-y

Lowenthal, P. R., & Snelson, C. (2017). In search of a better understanding of social presence: An investigation into how researchers define social presence. Distance Education, 38(2), 141-159. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2017.1324727

Paquette, P. (2016). Instructing the instructors: Training instructors to use social presence cues in online courses. Journal of Educators Online, 13(1), 80–108. https://doi.org/10.9743/JEO.2016.1.4

Peacock, S., & Cowan, J. (2019). Promoting sense of belonging in online learning communities of inquiry at accredited courses. Online Learning, 23(2), 67–81. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v23i2.1488

Peacock, S., Cowan, J., Irvine, L., & Williams, J. (2020). An exploration into the importance of a sense of belonging for online learners. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 21(2). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v21i2.4539

Richardson, J. C., Koehler, A., Besser, E., Caskurlu, S., Lim, J., & Mueller, C. (2015). Conceptualizing and investigating instructor presence in online learning environments. The International Review of Research

Richardson, J. C., Maeda, Y., Lv, J., & Caskurlu, S. (2017). Social presence in relation to students’ satisfaction and learning in online environments: A meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 402-417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.001

Rovai, A. P. (2003). In search of higher persistence rates in distance education online programs. Internet and Higher Education, 6(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(02)00158-6

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101860.

Tinto, V. (2022). Student retention and persistence in higher education: A theoretical review. Journal of College Student Retention, 24(2), 173-196.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-11

How to Cite

Phiri, E. (2025). Effect of Instructor Social Presence on Learner Persistence in Online Undergraduate Courses: The Mediating Role of Academic Belonging in South Africa. Journal of Online and Distance Learning, 5(2), 22–31. https://doi.org/10.47941/jodl.3508

Issue

Section

Articles