Outdoor Recreation and Environmental Conservation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47941/ijars.1787Keywords:
Outdoor Recreation, Environmental Conservation, Social-Ecological Systems Theory, Environmental Psychology, Stakeholder Collaboration, Management Strategies, Policy Interventions, Educational Initiatives, Research Priorities, Sustainability, Stewardship, Well-BeingAbstract
Purpose: The general objective of this study was to examine different types of outdoor recreation activities and their impact on environmental conservation efforts.
Methodology: The study adopted a desktop research methodology. Desk research refers to secondary data or that which can be collected without fieldwork. Desk research is basically involved in collecting data from existing resources hence it is often considered a low cost technique as compared to field research, as the main cost is involved in executive's time, telephone charges and directories. Thus, the study relied on already published studies, reports and statistics. This secondary data was easily accessed through the online journals and library.
Findings: The findings reveal that there exists a contextual and methodological gap relating to technology and traditional arts in modern sporting events. The study provided a comprehensive analysis of the complex relationship between outdoor recreation and conservation efforts. It concluded that while outdoor recreation offered various benefits, including economic contributions and fostering a connection to nature, it also posed challenges such as habitat degradation and natural resource depletion. Collaborative efforts among stakeholders, including policymakers and the public, were highlighted as crucial for achieving a balance between recreational use and conservation objectives. Additionally, education and outreach played a vital role in promoting environmental awareness and encouraging sustainable behaviors among outdoor recreationists. Overall, the study underscored the importance of integrating principles of sustainability and stewardship into outdoor recreation practices to ensure the long-term health of natural landscapes.
Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: Social-Ecological Systems theory, Environmental Psychology model and Ecological Modernization theory may be used to anchor future studies on outdoor recreation and environmental conservation contributed significantly to theory, practice, and policy by elucidating the complex interactions between outdoor recreation and conservation. It provided insights into theoretical frameworks such as Social-Ecological Systems theory and Environmental Psychology, informing evidence-based management strategies and policy interventions. Recommendations included integrating outdoor recreation into policy agendas, prioritizing stakeholder collaboration, and investing in educational initiatives. Research priorities emphasized longitudinal studies, interdisciplinary collaborations, and comparative research to address complex socio-ecological challenges. These contributions aimed to promote the sustainable coexistence of outdoor recreation and environmental conservation, fostering a culture of stewardship and ensuring the long-term well-being of natural landscapes and communities.
Downloads
References
Anderson, D., Brown, P., & Mahoney, C. (2018). Economic impacts of outdoor recreation on rural communities: A case study of rural counties in the United States. Journal of Rural Studies, 63, 126-135.Larson, L. R., Stedman, R. C., Cooper, C. B., & Decker, D. J. (2018). Understanding the multi-dimensional structure of pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 59, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2018.07.001
Bixler, R. D., & Floyd, M. F. (2018). Nature is fun, but does it make you good? The influence of outdoor recreation experiences on environmental attitudes and behaviors. Environment and Behavior, 50(6), 715-749.
Bricker, K. S., & Kerstetter, D. L. (2015). The influence of interpretive services on visitors' experiences and perceptions in U.S. national parks. Journal of Interpretation Research, 20(2), 15-34.
D'Antonio, A., & Monz, C. (2016). Sustainable outdoor recreation: A state-of-the-knowledge synthesis of visitor impacts and visitor management in wilderness. International Journal of Wilderness, 22(2), 20-26.
Frumkin, H., & Louv, R. (2017). The growing disconnect between children and nature: Implications for children's health, development, and conservation. Current Problems in Pediatric and Adolescent Health Care, 47(5), 102-117.
Gov.uk. (2021). 30 by 30: protecting the planet for future generations. https://www.gov.uk/government/news/30-by-30-protecting-the-planet-for-future-generations
Hübschle, A. (2017). Environmental peacebuilding in Africa: A call for more research and evidence. African Journal on Conflict Resolution, 17(1), 7-30. https://doi.org/10.10520/EJC-8a7dd0547
INPE - Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais. (2021). Amazon deforestation alert system (SAD). http://terrabrasilis.dpi.inpe.br/app/dashboard/alerts/legal/amazon/aggregated/
Jones, M. L., Brehob, E., Bowker, J. M., Bergstrom, J. C., & Kline, J. D. (2018). The economics of the National Park Service centennial: An empirical assessment incorporating count data modeling. Journal of Environmental Management, 209, 223-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.12.042
Kaplan, S., & Kaplan, R. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. Cambridge University Press.
Kawase, H., & Nakamura, S. (2017). Technological innovation and environmental conservation: Evidence from Japan. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 60(5), 871-891. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2016.1182879
Kyle, G., Graefe, A., & Manning, R. (2012). Understanding the role of leisure motivation in the study of nature-based tourism. Journal of Leisure Research, 44(4), 424-442.
Mace, B. L., Bell, P. A., & Loomis, R. J. (2018). Engaging outdoor recreationists in conservation of sensitive natural areas through experimental education. Environmental Management, 62(5), 860-868. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-018-1090-3
Manning, R. E., Anderson, L. E., Valliere, W. A., & Moore, D. (2016). The contribution of national parks to personal happiness. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 34(3), 91-105. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26802131
Mol, A. P. J., & Spaargaren, G. (2000). Ecological modernization theory in debate: A review. Environmental Politics, 9(1), 17-49. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644010008414515
Monz, C. A., Pickering, C. M., Hadwen, W. L., & Buckley, R. C. (2013). Positive and negative consequences of conservation tourism on protected area management. Conservation Biology, 27(2), 193-203. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12007
Ogada, M. O., Woodroffe, R., Oguge, N. O., & Frank, L. G. (2016). Limiting depredation by African carnivores: The role of livestock husbandry. Conservation Biology, 30(3), 608-621. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12613
Ostrom, E. (2009). A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science, 325(5939), 419-422. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1172133
Outdoor Industry Association. (2020). The outdoor recreation economy. https://outdoorindustry.org/resource/2020-outdoor-recreation-economic-report/
Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB). (2020). About us. https://www.rspb.org.uk/about-the-rspb/
Ulrich, R. S. (1983). Aesthetic and affective response to natural environment. In I. Altman & J. Wohlwill (Eds.), Behavior and the Natural Environment (pp. 85-125). Springer.
UNESCO. (n.d.). Yakushima. https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/662
Williams, D. R., & Carr, D. S. (2018). Why do people visit urban parks? A review of the literature and implications for park design and management. Journal of Urban Design, 23(4), 1-18.
Zylstra, M. J., Knight, A. T., Esler, K. J., & Le Grange, L. L. (2014). Connectedness as a core conservation concern: An interdisciplinary review of theory and a call for practice. Springer Science Reviews, 2(1), 119-143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40362-014-0023-5
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Joyce Babatunde
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.