The Efficacy of Restorative Justice Programs in Reducing Recidivism Rates
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47941/ijhss.1882Keywords:
Efficacy, Restorative Justice, Recidivism Rates, Desistance, Mechanisms, Training, Accreditation, Practitioners, Trauma-Informed, Cultural Competence, Legislative Reforms, Diversion Programs, Community Stakeholders, Sustainability, Positive OutcomesAbstract
Purpose: This study sought to assess the efficacy of restorative justice programs in reducing recidivism rates.
Methodology: The study adopted a desktop research methodology. Desk research refers to secondary data or that which can be collected without fieldwork. Desk research is basically involved in collecting data from existing resources hence it is often considered a low cost technique as compared to field research, as the main cost is involved in executive's time, telephone charges and directories. Thus, the study relied on already published studies, reports and statistics. This secondary data was easily accessed through the online journals and library.
Findings: The findings reveal that there exists a contextual and methodological gap relating to restorative justice programs in reducing recidivism rates. Preliminary empirical review revealed that restorative justice interventions were effective in reducing reoffending and promoting positive outcomes for both offenders and victims. Through processes such as victim-offender mediation and family group conferencing, restorative justice provided opportunities for offenders to take responsibility, repair harm, and engage in rehabilitation. While acknowledging variations in effectiveness based on offender characteristics and program implementation, the study highlighted the importance of continued investment in restorative justice initiatives to create a more just and equitable criminal justice system.
Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: Labeling theory, Social Learning theory and Routine Activities theory may be used to anchor future studies on restorative justice programs in reducing recidivism rates. The study offered recommendations that contributed to theoretical advancements, practical improvements, and policy developments in the field. It emphasized the importance of exploring underlying mechanisms, standardized training for practitioners, and integration of restorative principles into mainstream criminal justice policies. These recommendations were aimed at enhancing the effectiveness and sustainability of restorative justice interventions in promoting positive outcomes for victims, offenders, and communities.
Downloads
References
Amankwaa, L. C. (2019). Challenges facing released prisoners and their reintegration into society: The case of Ghana. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 63(10), 1643–1660. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X18823314
Bradshaw, W., & Roseborough, D. (2018). The impact of restorative justice on victim satisfaction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 45(8), 1151–1173. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854818768477
Caldeira, C., Augusto, A. M., & Dias, F. R. (2019). Reoffending rate of people released from prisons in Brazil. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 32, 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41155-019-0123-0
Durose, M. R., Cooper, A. D., & Snyder, H. N. (2018). Recidivism of prisoners released in 30 states in 2005: Patterns from 2005 to 2010. Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report. https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR32582.v2
Hamilton, L., & Bradshaw, W. (2019). Factors influencing the implementation and effectiveness of restorative justice programs: Perspectives from stakeholders. Criminal Justice Review, 44(3), 282–300. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734016819831669
Latimer, J., Dowden, C., & Muise, D. (2013). The effectiveness of restorative justice practices: A meta-analysis. The Prison Journal, 93(4), 446–468. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885513505054
Latimer, J., Dowden, C., & Muise, D. (2017). The effectiveness of restorative justice practices: A meta-analysis. The Prison Journal, 97(6), 672–694. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885517733438
Latimer, J., Morton-Bourgon, K., & Chretien, J. (2017). A meta-analytic examination of the effectiveness of restorative justice programs for intimate partner violence offenders. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 13(3), 347–374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-017-9296-6
Mallik-Kane, K., & Visher, C. A. (2015). Health and prisoner reentry: How physical, mental, and substance abuse conditions shape the process of reintegration. Urban Institute Justice Policy Center. https://www.urban.org/research/publication/health-and-prisoner-reentry-how-physical-mental-and-substance-abuse-conditions-shape-process-reintegration
Ministry of Justice. (2019). Proven reoffending statistics: April 2017 to March 2018. https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/proven-reoffending-statistics-april-2017-to-march-2018
Paparozzi, M. A., & Demichele, M. (2016). A meta-analysis of recidivism rates: Implications for criminal justice policy and practice. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 60(2), 168–189. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X14560727
Strang, H., & Sherman, L. W. (2013). Repairing the harm: A longitudinal study of crime, desistance, and restorative justice. Justice Quarterly, 30(3), 466–500. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2011.619664
Strang, H., Sherman, L. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., Woods, D. J., & Ariel, B. (2016). Restorative justice conferencing for reducing recidivism in young offenders (aged 7 to 21). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2016(8), CD012349. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012349
Sullivan, C. J., McGloin, J. M., & Pratt, T. C. (2016). Longitudinal effects of restorative justice practices on desistance from crime. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 14(4), 399–417. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204015599802
Sullivan, C. J., McGloin, J. M., & Pratt, T. C. (2020). A life-course perspective on desistance from crime. In D. P. Farrington, L. Kazemian, & A. R. Piquero (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology (pp. 345–360). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190201371.013.18
Takahashi, Y., & Tsuchiya, M. (2017). A study on the mechanism of the reoffending process in Japan. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 56(6), 391–408. https://doi.org/10.1080/10509674.2017.1303133
Umbreit, M. S., & Armour, M. P. (2017). Victims and offenders experiences with restorative justice: Implications for the justice system. Victims & Offenders, 12(5), 644–665. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2016.1196201
Van Ness, D. W., & Strong, K. H. (2015). Restoring justice: An introduction to restorative justice (5th ed.). Routledge.
Wenzel, M., Okimoto, T. G., & Feather, N. T. (2012). Restorative justice and attributions of moral responsibility. Law and Human Behavior, 36(5), 398–407. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093945
Wilson, D. B., & Olaghere, A. (2017). Changing correctional policies to reduce recidivism. Criminology & Public Policy, 16(1), 283–293. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12253
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Nayah Ahidjo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
