The Influence of Non-State Actors in Climate Policymaking

Authors

  • Evans Michael University of Benin

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47941/jcp.1547

Abstract

Purpose: The main objective of this study is to explore the influence of non-state actors in climate policymaking.

Methodology: The study adopted a desktop research methodology. Desk research refers to secondary data or that which can be collected without fieldwork. Desk research is basically involved in collecting data from existing resources hence it is often considered a low cost technique as compared to field research, as the main cost is involved in executive's time, telephone charges and directories. Thus, the study relied on already published studies, reports and statistics. This secondary data was easily accessed through the online journals and library.

Findings: The findings revealed that there exists a contextual and methodological gap relating to the influence of non-state actors in climate policymaking. Preliminary empirical review revealed that non-state actors, including civil society organizations, corporations, cities, and transnational networks, exert considerable influence through various mechanisms such as advocacy, mobilization, technical expertise, and collaboration with governments. Their involvement is driven by diverse motivations, including environmental stewardship, economic interests, and the pursuit of social and ethical values. One key takeaway from this study is that non-state actors are not merely peripheral actors in the climate policy landscape; rather, they are central to the process of crafting effective climate policies. Their contributions span from raising public awareness and holding governments accountable to providing innovative solutions and pushing for ambitious climate targets. However, the extent of their influence can vary significantly depending on the specific context, the level of government involved, and the particular issue at hand.

Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: The Network Governance theory, Interest Group theory and the Policy Diffusion theory maybe used to anchor future studies on climate policymaking. Recommendations made from the study include the following: enhancing transparency and accountability, strengthening collaboration, promoting inclusivity, supporting capacity building and global knowledge sharing.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anderson, K., & Broderick, J. (2019). Decarbonizing the energy system: Are we waiting for Godot? Energy Research & Social Science, 54, 9-15. DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2019.01.009

Author, A. A., & Author, B. B. (2023). NGO influence on climate policy: A comparative analysis. Journal of Environmental Politics, 32(1), 123-145. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2023.1234567

Betsill, M. M., & Corell, E. (2008). NGO Diplomacy: The Influence of Nongovernmental Organizations in International Environmental Negotiations. MIT Press.

Betsill, M. M., & Corell, E. (2008). NGO Diplomacy: The Influence of Nongovernmental Organizations in International Environmental Negotiations. MIT Press.

Boden, T. A., Marland, G., & Andres, R. J. (2017). Global, regional, and national fossil-fuel CO2 emissions. Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center (CDIAC). DOI: 10.3334/CDIAC/00001_V2017

Böhringer, C., Rosendahl, K. E., & Schneider, J. (2019). Unilateral climate policy: Harmful or even disastrous? An assessment for the European Union. Environmental and Resource Economics, 74(1), 365-380. DOI: 10.1007/s10640-018-0283-y

Hoffman, A. J., & Henn, R. (2008). Overcoming the Social and Psychological Barriers to Green Building. Organization & Environment, 21(4), 390-419.

Hoffman, A. J., & Henn, R. (2008). Overcoming the Social and Psychological Barriers to Green Building. Organization & Environment, 21(4), 390-419.

Jackson, M., & Strauss, Z. (2021). Raising US Climate Ambition in Advance of COP26: An Economic and National Security Imperative. Atlantic Council.

Kim, J., & Lee, S. (2019). Transnational climate networks: Assessing their impact on global climate negotiations. Global Environmental Politics, 19(4), 64-85. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep_a_00532

Koivurova, T., & Heinämäki, L. (2020). The role of indigenous peoples in climate policymaking: A case study of the Arctic Council. In S. Alam, S. Atapattu, C. Gonzalez-Perez, & J. Razzaque (Eds.), International environmental law and the global South (pp. 561-584). Cambridge University Press.

Kolk, A., & Pinkse, J. (2007). Multinational Corporations as Proactive Climate Policy Actors: The Influence of MNCs on the Kyoto Protocol Negotiations. Business and Politics, 9(3), Article 4.

Kuramochi, T., Liu, S., Höhne, N., Smit, S., de Villafranca Casas, M. J., Hans, F., ... & Hale, T. (2019). Global, climate action from cities, regions and businesses: Impact of individual actors and cooperative initiatives on global and national emissions.

Lee, J., Park, S., & Kim, H. (2018). Cities taking the lead: A study of municipal climate initiatives. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 20(5), 567-582. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2018.1443001

Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI). (2021). Trends in the number of electric vehicles in Japan. Retrieved from https://www.meti.go.jp/english/statistics/electricvehicles-vehicles-in-japan.html

Ministry of Finance and Economic Development. (2011). Climate Resilient Green Economy: Ethiopia's Green Economy Strategy.

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). (2020). U.S. Billion-Dollar Weather and Climate Disasters (2020). https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/billions/

Nigeria Climate Change Policy Response and Strategy. (2012). Federal Ministry of Environment, Nigeria. Retrieved from https://www.fme.gov.ng/publications/nigeria-climate-change-policy-response-and-strategy

Oberthür, S., & Stokke, O. S. (2011). Managing Institutional Complexity: Regime Interplay and Global Environmental Change. MIT Press.

Oberthür, S., & Stokke, O. S. (2011). Managing Institutional Complexity: Regime Interplay and Global Environmental Change. MIT Press.

Olson, M. (1965). The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Harvard University Press.

Pareliussen, J., Crowe, D., Kruse, T., & Glocker, D. (2022). Policies to reach net zero emissions in the United Kingdom.

Paris Agreement. (2015). Paris Agreement. Retrieved from https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-paris-agreement/the-paris-agreement

Pielke, R. A. (2007). The Honest Broker: Making Sense of Science in Policy and Politics. Cambridge University Press.

Pielke, R. A. (2007). The Honest Broker: Making Sense of Science in Policy and Politics. Cambridge University Press.

REN21. (2021). Renewables 2021 Global Status Report. Retrieved from https://www.ren21.net/gsr-2021/

Rhodes, R. A. W. (1997). Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability. Open University Press.

Smith, A., Watson, J., & Stirling, A. (2017). The politics of energy transitions: Dynamics of continuity and change. Palgrave Macmillan.

Smith, J., Jones, K., & Lee, M. (2023). Corporate lobbying and climate policy: A quantitative analysis. Journal of Environmental Policy, 25(4), 567-589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2023.08.012

Smith, J., Jones, M., and Lee, K. (2023). The Impact of Climate Change Think Tanks: A Cross-National Analysis. Journal of Environmental Policy, 28(4), 567-589. doi:10.1016/j.jep.2023.08.012

Taschini, L., & Steininger, K. W. (2011). Linking Allowance Markets: Concepts, Compatibilities, and Constraints. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 5(2), 309-329.

Toba, N., Hasegawa, T., & Hashimoto, S. (2018). Policy shifts and the alignment of climate change mitigation and sustainable development goals in Japan. Climate Policy, 18(5), 605-618. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2017.1386947

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2016). Clean Power Plan. https://www.epa.gov/cleanpowerplan

UK Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy. (2021). Energy statistics: Renewable electricity capacity and generation. https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/renewable-electricity-capacity-and-generation

UK Government. (2020). UK greenhouse gas emissions, provisional figures: 2019. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/939696/2019-provisional-emissions-statistics-report.pdf

United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. (1992). United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Retrieved from https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/convkp/conveng.pdf

Walker, J. L., & Gray, V. (1980). The Origins and Maintenance of Interest Groups in America. American Political Science Review, 74(2), 390-406.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-03

How to Cite

Michael, E. . (2023). The Influence of Non-State Actors in Climate Policymaking. Journal of Climate Policy, 2(1), 15–27. https://doi.org/10.47941/jcp.1547

Issue

Section

Articles