Effects of International Climate Policy on Renewable Energy Consumption: The Context of the Kyoto Protocol

Authors

  • Mohammad Aynal Haque University of Connecticut

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47941/jcp.1625

Abstract

Purpose: The key objective of this study is to explore the effect of the Kyoto Protocol on Renewable Energy Consumption at the national level.

Methodology: The study employed the matching and difference-in-differences (DiD) estimation approaches. The study analysis is based on secondary resources assessed through openly access documents, journals, and libraries. Data used in the analysis were collected from publicly available data sources.

Findings: The study finds that the Kyoto Protocol has a significant and positive impact on renewable energy consumption at the national level in the Annex I countries compared to non-Annex I countries. It indicates that there has been a specific effect of the Kyoto Protocol on renewable energy in Annex I countries since these countries were legally bound with emissions reduction commitments of the Protocol. Findings indicate that Annex I countries overlooked environmental pollution at the early stages of their economic and industrial development, but with their higher economic development, they are taking measures to prevent environmental pollution, such as increasing REC. Findings here reckon with the argument of the effectiveness of global climate governance in mitigating climate change effects.

Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: Findings support the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) proposition. Results stresses on the effectiveness of global climate governance for mitigating climate change effects. In this context, rich countries should deliver more financial and technological supports to poor countries.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Mohammad Aynal Haque, University of Connecticut

PhD Candidate

Political Science Department

References

Aichele, R., and Felbermayr, G. (2013). The effect of the Kyoto Protocol on carbon emissions. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 32(4), 731-757.

Apergis, N., and Payne, J. E. (2014). The causal dynamics between renewable energy, real GDP, emissions and oil prices: evidence from OECD countries. Applied Economics, 46(36), 4519-4525.

Bäckstrand, K., and Lövbrand, E. (Eds.). (2015). Research handbook on climate governance. Edward Elgar Publishing.

British Petroleum (2020). Oil Price (West Texas Intermediate). Retrieved from https://www.bp.com

Cifci, E., and Oliver, M. E. (2018). Reassessing the links between GHG emissions, economic growth, and the UNFCCC: A difference-in-differences approach. Sustainability, 10(2), 334.

Dehejia, R. H., and Wahba, S. (2002). Propensity score-matching methods for nonexperimental causal studies. Review of Economics and statistics, 84(1), 151-161.

Esty, D. C. (2008). Rethinking global environmental governance to deal with climate change: The multiple logics of global collective action. American economic review, 98(2), 116-121.

Freedom House (2020). Democracy Score. Retrieved from

Governance, 15(4), 427-434.

Grossman, GM., and Krueger, AB. (1991). Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement. No. w3914. National Bureau of economic research, 1991.

Grunewald, N., and Martinez-Zarzoso, I. (2016). Did the Kyoto Protocol fail? An evaluation of the effect of the Kyoto Protocol on CO2 emissions. Environment and Development Economics, 21(1), 1-22.

Harris, P. G. (Ed.). (2007). Europe and global climate change: Politics, foreign policy and regional cooperation. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Hein, W., and Holstenkamp, L. (2018). Global governance and the interplay of coordination and contestation: The Case of Renewable Energies in the South. Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations, 24(3), 431-449.

https://freedomhouse.org

https://unfccc.int/process/parties-non-party-stakeholders/parties-convention-and observerstates?field_national_communications_target_id%5B515%5D=515&field_partys_partyto_target_id%5B512%5D=512

https://unfccc.int/process/the-kyoto-protocol/status-of-ratification

https://www.eia.gov

https://www.irena.org/publications/2020/Apr/Global-Renewables-Outlook-2020

https://www.ren21.net/wpcontent/uploads/2019/05/gsr_2019_full_report_en.pdf

https://www.renewable-ei.org/en/activities/column/REupdate/20200302.php

International Monetary Fund (2020). Consumer Price Index. Retrieved from https://www.imf.org/en/Data

International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA), G. R. O. (2020). Energy transformation

Jebli, M. B., Youssef, S. B., and Ozturk, I. (2016). Testing environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: The role of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption and trade in OECD countries. Ecological indicators, 60, 824-831.

Kåberger. T. (2020). 2019 Global power sector developments: RE finally dominated growth, Renewable Energy Institute. Retrieved from

Kyoto Protocol (2005). Kyoto Protocol. Retrieved from

Liu, W., Zhang, X., and Feng, S. (2019). Does renewable energy policy work? Evidence from a panel data analysis. Renewable Energy, 135, 635-642.

Nguyen, K. H., and Kakinaka, M. (2019). Renewable energy consumption, carbon emissions, and development stages: Some evidence from panel cointegration analysis. Renewable Energy, 132, 1049-1057.

Payne, J. E. (2012). The causal dynamics between US renewable energy consumption, output, emissions, and oil prices. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy, 7(4), 323-330.

Penn World Table9.1 (2020). Capita Stock. Retrieved from https://www.rug.nl/ggdc/productivity/pwt/?lang=en

Przychodzen, W., and Przychodzen, J. (2020). Determinants of renewable energy production in transition economies: A panel data approach. Energy, 191, 116583.

Raturi, A. K. (2019). Renewables 2019 global status report. Retrieved from

Sadorsky, P. (2009a). Renewable energy consumption, CO2 emissions and oil prices in the G7 countries. Energy Economics, 31(3), 456-462.

Salim, R. A., and Rafiq, S. (2012). Why do some emerging economies proactively accelerate the adoption of renewable energy?. Energy economics, 34(4), 1051-1057.

Shafiei, S., and Salim, R. A. (2014). Non-renewable and renewable energy consumption and CO2 emissions in OECD countries: a comparative analysis. Energy policy, 66, 547-556.

Shafik, N. (1994). Economic development and environmental quality: an econometric analysis. Oxford economic papers, 46(Supplement_1) 757-773.

Tienhaara, K., and Downie, C. (2018). Risky business? The energy Charter Treaty, renewable energy, and investor-state disputes. Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations, 24(3), 451-471.

UNFCCC (2005). Country Categorization: Annex I and non-Annex I countries. Retrieved from

United States Energy Information Administration (2020). Energy Intensity. Retrieved from

Vogler, J. (2015). Realism. In Research Handbook on Climate Governance (pp. 14-24). Edward Elgar Publishing.

Wohlgemuth, N., and Missfeldt, F. (2000). The Kyoto mechanisms and the prospects for renewable energy technologies. Solar Energy, 69(4), 305-314.

World Bank (2020). World Development Indicators. Retrieved from https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/public-licenses#cc-by

Downloads

Published

2024-01-15

How to Cite

Haque, M. A. (2024). Effects of International Climate Policy on Renewable Energy Consumption: The Context of the Kyoto Protocol. Journal of Climate Policy, 3(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.47941/jcp.1625

Issue

Section

Articles