SYSTEMATIZATION OF RESEARCH INTEGRITY BY REGULATORY BODIES AND UNIVERSITIES IN AFRICA: RESEARCH AND PUBLICATION ETHICS

Authors

  • Lillian Omutoko

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47941/jep.386

Keywords:

Academic integrity, bioethics, research ethics, research integrity, research misconduct, scientific misconduct

Abstract

Purpose: Research misconduct is a global ethical concern that imparts negatively on scientific processes and expectations. Other related ethical concerns are academic fraud among researchers in academic institutions.  These activities are against the norms of research and academic practice. Some common occurrences in institutions are multiple submission of papers for publication, use of unauthorized assistance or various forms of dishonesty that occur in relation to any academic exercise. Research integrity is a complex multifaceted task that touches on different phases of research. Institutions in Africa barely have policies and structures to uphold research integrity and where they exist, the enforcement mechanisms are not synchronized. Prevention of research misconduct and enforcement of research integrity policies cannot be the responsibility of any single person or institution, it can only be successful if it is a concerted effort. Universities, national bodies and research ethics committees have a major role to play in maintaining research integrity. The purpose of this paper is to explore and develop a systematic approach to enhance research integrity.  The paper examines common research integrity issues and proposes pragmatic approaches for preventing research misconduct.   

Methodology: The methodology employed was desktop document analysis of related journal articles, guidelines and institutional websites.   Case studies of misconduct were reviewed to make sense of types of scientific misconduct that have been recorded in Africa. 

Results: Institutions can customize the institutional model according to identified needs and existing structures. The proposed framework would be successful if the efforts are implemented within a multi-thronged approach that includes mentorship and capacity building at all levels for creation of an ethical research culture that enhances credibility of research and builds public trust.   

Contributions to theory, policy and practice:  It is envisaged that the proposed model will improve enforcement of related policies and promote research integrity. A holistic model to streamline prevention of misconduct and nurture a culture of ethical conduct in research is also recommended. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Africa Research Integrity Network (2018). Working Together Towards Promoting Research

Integrity in Africa. http://www.globalhealthethics.org/wp-

content/uploads/2018/08/ARINNewsletter-1-of-2018-August.pdf

Bierer, B.E. (2010). Case Studies: Authorship Questions. https://www.brighamandwomens.org. Accessed 4th August 2017

Brandt, Allan M. 1978. "Racism and research: The case of the Tuskegee Syphilis study." The Hastings Center Report 8(6): 21-29. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3561468. Retrieved on 23rd September 2019 at 5.24

(Bwisa, H. 2019). JKUAT should produce more than 118PhD graduates at any given one given graduation http://profbwisa.mukmik.co.ke/index.php/2019/07/14/jkuat-should-producemorethan-118-phd-graduates-at-any-one-given-graduation/

Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). (2009). Retraction Guidelines. www.publicationethics.org.https://publicationethics.org/files/retraction%20guidelines_0.pdf.

Committee on Responsible Science (2017). Fostering Integrity in Research. National Academic Press. https: //www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK475953/pdf/Bookshelf_NBK475953.pdf. Retrived on 25th September 2019 at 5.36

Commission of University Education (2014). Harmonized Criteria and Guidelines for Appointment and Promotion of Academic Staff in Universities in Kenya http://www.cue.or.ke/images/news/appointment_promotion_criteria_universities_2014.pdf

CUE submits report on JKUAT's 118 PhDs to Education Ministry. https://www.nation.co.ke/news/education/CUE-submits-report-Jkuat-s-118PhDs/26436045197254-11hert2z/index.html

Department of Health. Republic of South Africa (2006) (Ed).Guidelines for Good Practice in the Conduct of Clinical Trials with Human Participants in South Africa.

Department of Health. Republic of South Africa (2004). Ethics in Health Research: Principles, Structures and Processes.

Fang, F.C., Steen, R.G. & Casadevall, A. (2012). Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of

America (PNAS). 109(42) 17028-17033 https://www.pnas.org/content/109/42/17028.https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1212247109

Fang, F.C & Casadevall, A. (2011). Retracted Science and the Retraction Index. American Society for Microbiology. 79(10) pp. 3855-3859. DOI: 10.1128/IAI.05661-11. https://iai.asm.org/content/79/10/3855.short

Government Gazette No.26595 (2004).National Health Act No.61, 2003

Grady, C. (2015). Institutional Review Boards. Purposes and Challenges. Chest 148(5).1148-1155.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4631034/. doi:10.1378/chest.15-0706

Krugman, S. (1986). The Willowbrook Hepatitis Studies Revisited: Ethical Aspects. Reviews of

Infectious Diseases. Vol.8 (1) pp.157-162. https://www.gvsu.edu/cms4/asset/F51281F000AFE25A-5BF632E8D4A243C7/willowbrook_hepatitis_studies.pdf. Retrieved on 23rd September 2019 at 5.09

Horn, L. (2016). Promoting Responsible Research Conduct: A South African Perspective. Journal of Academic Ethics. Vol. 15(1) pp. 59-72. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10805-016-9272-8

Horn, L. (2013). Promoting responsible research conduct in a developing world academic context. South African Journal of Bioethics and Law. Vol.6 (1) pp. 21-24. Retrieved from https://www.ajol.info/index.php/sajbl/article/view/90037/79494

International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) (2018). Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals.

http://www.icmje.org/icmje-recommendations.pdf. www.icmje.org

Jones, R. (2002). Research Misconduct .Family Practice. Vol.19 (2). Oxford University Press. Great Britain. https://watermark.silverchair.com/190123.pdf

Keymanthri, M. (2017). Medical ethics, law and human rights. A South African perspective. Van Schaik. South Africa.

Kombe, F. Anunobi, E.T., Shifungula, N.P., Wassenaar, D., Njadingwe, D., Mwalukore, S.,Chinyama,J., Randrianasolo,B., Akinde,P., Dlamini, S.,Ramiandrusoa,F.N. & Ranaivo (2014). Promoting Research Integrity in Africa: An African Voice of Concern on Research Misconduct and the Way forward. Developing World Bioethics 14(3) pp.158-166. doi: 101111/dewb.12024

Martyn, C. (2003). Fabrication, falsification and plagiarism. An International Journal of Medicine, Vol. 96(4) pp. 243-244.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2052883/0026.pdf

Mellanby, K. (1947). Medical Experiments on Human Beings in Concentration Camps in Nazi

Germany. British Medical Journal pp.148-150. https://www.ncbi.nlm.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2005883/pdf/brmedj037-0026.pdf. Retrieved on 23rd September 2019 at 18.06

Montreal Statement on Research Integrity in Cross-Boundary Research Collaborations. https://wcrif.org/montreal-statement/file. Retrieved on 23rd April 2019 at 19.53

Stellenbosch University. Policy for Responsible Research Conduct at Stellenbosch University.https://www.sun.ac.za/english/policy/Documents/Research%20Ethics%20Policy.pdf. Retrieved on 1th September, 2019 at 18.45

Stellenbosch University. Research Integrity and Ethics. http://www.sun.ac.za/english/researchinnovation/Research-Development/integrity-ethics

Ogungbure, A.A. (2011). The Tuskegee Syphyllis Study: Some Ethical Reflections. Thought and

Practice: A Journal of the Philosophical Association of Kenya (PAK). New Series, Vol. 3(2).pp75- 92. https://www.ajol.info/index.php/tp/article/download/74876/654/65

Office of Research Integrity. https://ori.hhs.gov/definition-misconduct

Office of Research Integrity. Avoiding Research Misconduct. https://ori.hhs.gov/the-lab

Okonta, P. & Rossouw, T. (2013). Prevalence of Scientific Misconduct among a Group of Researchers in Nigeria. Developing world bioethics. 13(3):149-57 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1471-8847.2012.00339.x:

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-8847.2012.00339.x

Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development Global Science Forum (2017). Best Practices for Ensuring Scientific Integrity and Preventing Misconduct. http://www.oecd.org

Resnik, D. B., Rasmussen, L.M. and Kissling, G.E. (2015). An International Study of Research Misconduct Policies. Accountability in Research Policies and Quality Assurance.22 (5):249-66.

DOI:10.1080/08989621.2014.958218.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/275666303_An_ International_Study_of_Research_Misconduct_Policies

Siegler-Itzkovich, J. (2007).Israeli Surgeons Put Their Names on Study They Had Not Done. BMJ:

British Medical Journal. Vol. 334(7602) p.1023. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/20507168?readnow=1&refreqid=excelsior%3A0095118f5ed728398 8c2da861403c31d&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

Shahnazarian, D., Rose, S.L.,Hagemann, J. and Aburto, M.(2017). Avoiding Being Penalized:

Research Misconduct. University of Southern California.

https://oprs.usc.edu/files/2017/05/Whatis-Research-Misconduct-4.5.13.pdf

UNESCO (2005). Establishing Bioethics Committees. UNESCO. France. Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000139309

University of Cape Town. Office of Research Integrity. Retrieved from:

http://www.researchsupport.uct.ac.za/office-research-integrity. Retrieved on 16th September 2019 at 17.25

University of Cape Town. Research Integrity. Retrieved from: http://www.researchsupport.uct.ac.za/researchintegrity. Retrieved on 16th September, 2019 at

00

Were, E. and Kamaara, E. (2019).Research Misconduct:- a problem in Kenya as

well.https://irec.or.ke/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Research-Misconduct-a-problem-in-Kenyaaswell-E-WERE-KAMAARA.pdf. Retrieved on 25th September 201

Wiley (2014). Best Practice Guidelines on Publication Ethics. (Ed).John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

https://authorservices.wiley.com/asset/Ethics_Guidelines_7.06.17.pdf

World Conference on Research Integrity (2013). Montreal Statement on Research Integrity in Cross-Boundary Research Collaborations. https://wcrif.org/montreal-statement/file

World Conference on Research Integrity (2010). Singapore statement on research integrity.

https://www.jsps.go.jp/english/e-kousei/data/singapore_statement_EN.pdf

Downloads

Published

2020-03-24

How to Cite

Omutoko, L. (2020). SYSTEMATIZATION OF RESEARCH INTEGRITY BY REGULATORY BODIES AND UNIVERSITIES IN AFRICA: RESEARCH AND PUBLICATION ETHICS. Journal of Education and Practice, 4(1), 41–55. https://doi.org/10.47941/jep.386

Issue

Section

Articles