SYSTEMATIZATION OF RESEARCH INTEGRITY BY REGULATORY BODIES AND UNIVERSITIES IN AFRICA: RESEARCH AND PUBLICATION ETHICS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47941/jep.386Keywords:
Academic integrity, bioethics, research ethics, research integrity, research misconduct, scientific misconductAbstract
Purpose: Research misconduct is a global ethical concern that imparts negatively on scientific processes and expectations. Other related ethical concerns are academic fraud among researchers in academic institutions. These activities are against the norms of research and academic practice. Some common occurrences in institutions are multiple submission of papers for publication, use of unauthorized assistance or various forms of dishonesty that occur in relation to any academic exercise. Research integrity is a complex multifaceted task that touches on different phases of research. Institutions in Africa barely have policies and structures to uphold research integrity and where they exist, the enforcement mechanisms are not synchronized. Prevention of research misconduct and enforcement of research integrity policies cannot be the responsibility of any single person or institution, it can only be successful if it is a concerted effort. Universities, national bodies and research ethics committees have a major role to play in maintaining research integrity. The purpose of this paper is to explore and develop a systematic approach to enhance research integrity. The paper examines common research integrity issues and proposes pragmatic approaches for preventing research misconduct.
Methodology: The methodology employed was desktop document analysis of related journal articles, guidelines and institutional websites. Case studies of misconduct were reviewed to make sense of types of scientific misconduct that have been recorded in Africa.
Results: Institutions can customize the institutional model according to identified needs and existing structures. The proposed framework would be successful if the efforts are implemented within a multi-thronged approach that includes mentorship and capacity building at all levels for creation of an ethical research culture that enhances credibility of research and builds public trust.
Contributions to theory, policy and practice: It is envisaged that the proposed model will improve enforcement of related policies and promote research integrity. A holistic model to streamline prevention of misconduct and nurture a culture of ethical conduct in research is also recommended.
Downloads
References
Africa Research Integrity Network (2018). Working Together Towards Promoting Research
Integrity in Africa. http://www.globalhealthethics.org/wp-
content/uploads/2018/08/ARINNewsletter-1-of-2018-August.pdf
Bierer, B.E. (2010). Case Studies: Authorship Questions. https://www.brighamandwomens.org. Accessed 4th August 2017
Brandt, Allan M. 1978. "Racism and research: The case of the Tuskegee Syphilis study." The Hastings Center Report 8(6): 21-29. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3561468. Retrieved on 23rd September 2019 at 5.24
(Bwisa, H. 2019). JKUAT should produce more than 118PhD graduates at any given one given graduation http://profbwisa.mukmik.co.ke/index.php/2019/07/14/jkuat-should-producemorethan-118-phd-graduates-at-any-one-given-graduation/
Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). (2009). Retraction Guidelines. www.publicationethics.org.https://publicationethics.org/files/retraction%20guidelines_0.pdf.
Committee on Responsible Science (2017). Fostering Integrity in Research. National Academic Press. https: //www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK475953/pdf/Bookshelf_NBK475953.pdf. Retrived on 25th September 2019 at 5.36
Commission of University Education (2014). Harmonized Criteria and Guidelines for Appointment and Promotion of Academic Staff in Universities in Kenya http://www.cue.or.ke/images/news/appointment_promotion_criteria_universities_2014.pdf
CUE submits report on JKUAT's 118 PhDs to Education Ministry. https://www.nation.co.ke/news/education/CUE-submits-report-Jkuat-s-118PhDs/26436045197254-11hert2z/index.html
Department of Health. Republic of South Africa (2006) (Ed).Guidelines for Good Practice in the Conduct of Clinical Trials with Human Participants in South Africa.
Department of Health. Republic of South Africa (2004). Ethics in Health Research: Principles, Structures and Processes.
Fang, F.C., Steen, R.G. & Casadevall, A. (2012). Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of
America (PNAS). 109(42) 17028-17033 https://www.pnas.org/content/109/42/17028.https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1212247109
Fang, F.C & Casadevall, A. (2011). Retracted Science and the Retraction Index. American Society for Microbiology. 79(10) pp. 3855-3859. DOI: 10.1128/IAI.05661-11. https://iai.asm.org/content/79/10/3855.short
Government Gazette No.26595 (2004).National Health Act No.61, 2003
Grady, C. (2015). Institutional Review Boards. Purposes and Challenges. Chest 148(5).1148-1155.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4631034/. doi:10.1378/chest.15-0706
Krugman, S. (1986). The Willowbrook Hepatitis Studies Revisited: Ethical Aspects. Reviews of
Infectious Diseases. Vol.8 (1) pp.157-162. https://www.gvsu.edu/cms4/asset/F51281F000AFE25A-5BF632E8D4A243C7/willowbrook_hepatitis_studies.pdf. Retrieved on 23rd September 2019 at 5.09
Horn, L. (2016). Promoting Responsible Research Conduct: A South African Perspective. Journal of Academic Ethics. Vol. 15(1) pp. 59-72. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10805-016-9272-8
Horn, L. (2013). Promoting responsible research conduct in a developing world academic context. South African Journal of Bioethics and Law. Vol.6 (1) pp. 21-24. Retrieved from https://www.ajol.info/index.php/sajbl/article/view/90037/79494
International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) (2018). Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals.
http://www.icmje.org/icmje-recommendations.pdf. www.icmje.org
Jones, R. (2002). Research Misconduct .Family Practice. Vol.19 (2). Oxford University Press. Great Britain. https://watermark.silverchair.com/190123.pdf
Keymanthri, M. (2017). Medical ethics, law and human rights. A South African perspective. Van Schaik. South Africa.
Kombe, F. Anunobi, E.T., Shifungula, N.P., Wassenaar, D., Njadingwe, D., Mwalukore, S.,Chinyama,J., Randrianasolo,B., Akinde,P., Dlamini, S.,Ramiandrusoa,F.N. & Ranaivo (2014). Promoting Research Integrity in Africa: An African Voice of Concern on Research Misconduct and the Way forward. Developing World Bioethics 14(3) pp.158-166. doi: 101111/dewb.12024
Martyn, C. (2003). Fabrication, falsification and plagiarism. An International Journal of Medicine, Vol. 96(4) pp. 243-244.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2052883/0026.pdf
Mellanby, K. (1947). Medical Experiments on Human Beings in Concentration Camps in Nazi
Germany. British Medical Journal pp.148-150. https://www.ncbi.nlm.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2005883/pdf/brmedj037-0026.pdf. Retrieved on 23rd September 2019 at 18.06
Montreal Statement on Research Integrity in Cross-Boundary Research Collaborations. https://wcrif.org/montreal-statement/file. Retrieved on 23rd April 2019 at 19.53
Stellenbosch University. Policy for Responsible Research Conduct at Stellenbosch University.https://www.sun.ac.za/english/policy/Documents/Research%20Ethics%20Policy.pdf. Retrieved on 1th September, 2019 at 18.45
Stellenbosch University. Research Integrity and Ethics. http://www.sun.ac.za/english/researchinnovation/Research-Development/integrity-ethics
Ogungbure, A.A. (2011). The Tuskegee Syphyllis Study: Some Ethical Reflections. Thought and
Practice: A Journal of the Philosophical Association of Kenya (PAK). New Series, Vol. 3(2).pp75- 92. https://www.ajol.info/index.php/tp/article/download/74876/654/65
Office of Research Integrity. https://ori.hhs.gov/definition-misconduct
Office of Research Integrity. Avoiding Research Misconduct. https://ori.hhs.gov/the-lab
Okonta, P. & Rossouw, T. (2013). Prevalence of Scientific Misconduct among a Group of Researchers in Nigeria. Developing world bioethics. 13(3):149-57 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1471-8847.2012.00339.x:
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-8847.2012.00339.x
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development Global Science Forum (2017). Best Practices for Ensuring Scientific Integrity and Preventing Misconduct. http://www.oecd.org
Resnik, D. B., Rasmussen, L.M. and Kissling, G.E. (2015). An International Study of Research Misconduct Policies. Accountability in Research Policies and Quality Assurance.22 (5):249-66.
DOI:10.1080/08989621.2014.958218.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/275666303_An_ International_Study_of_Research_Misconduct_Policies
Siegler-Itzkovich, J. (2007).Israeli Surgeons Put Their Names on Study They Had Not Done. BMJ:
British Medical Journal. Vol. 334(7602) p.1023. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/20507168?readnow=1&refreqid=excelsior%3A0095118f5ed728398 8c2da861403c31d&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Shahnazarian, D., Rose, S.L.,Hagemann, J. and Aburto, M.(2017). Avoiding Being Penalized:
Research Misconduct. University of Southern California.
https://oprs.usc.edu/files/2017/05/Whatis-Research-Misconduct-4.5.13.pdf
UNESCO (2005). Establishing Bioethics Committees. UNESCO. France. Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000139309
University of Cape Town. Office of Research Integrity. Retrieved from:
http://www.researchsupport.uct.ac.za/office-research-integrity. Retrieved on 16th September 2019 at 17.25
University of Cape Town. Research Integrity. Retrieved from: http://www.researchsupport.uct.ac.za/researchintegrity. Retrieved on 16th September, 2019 at
00
Were, E. and Kamaara, E. (2019).Research Misconduct:- a problem in Kenya as
well.https://irec.or.ke/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Research-Misconduct-a-problem-in-Kenyaaswell-E-WERE-KAMAARA.pdf. Retrieved on 25th September 201
Wiley (2014). Best Practice Guidelines on Publication Ethics. (Ed).John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
https://authorservices.wiley.com/asset/Ethics_Guidelines_7.06.17.pdf
World Conference on Research Integrity (2013). Montreal Statement on Research Integrity in Cross-Boundary Research Collaborations. https://wcrif.org/montreal-statement/file
World Conference on Research Integrity (2010). Singapore statement on research integrity.
https://www.jsps.go.jp/english/e-kousei/data/singapore_statement_EN.pdf
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
