A Scale Development Study to Determine University Students' Perceptions towards Distance Education

Authors

  • Associated Prof. Dr. Erol Karaca Anadolu University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47941/jodl.1722
Abstract views: 50
PDF downloads: 25

Keywords:

Distance Education, Scale, Scale Development, Distance Education Perception Scale

Abstract

Purpose: The main purpose of this study is to develop a valid and reliable Likert-type measurement tool to determine how university students perceive distance education, which they experienced during the pandemic (COVID 19) period and is becoming more widespread day by day. In addition, in line with the main purpose answers were sought to the questions how university students perceive distance education and what the variables are that affect these perceptions. This research, which was conducted to determine how university students perceive the distance education they experienced during the epidemic process and the variables affecting this perception, is in a comparative type of relational screening model.

Methodology: The scanning model is used to detect a situation, individual or object that occurred in the past or is still ongoing, in its own conditions and as it exists. In determining the sample size, the number corresponding to 95% confidence level and 5% acceptable margin of error according to the number constituting the research population and the number corresponding to 5 times the number of items in the scale were taken as the basis. According to these criteria, the sample must be at least 350. The participants of this research are 406 students studying in Anadolu University, Faculty of Health Sciences, and Social Work Undergraduate Programs Turkey in the spring semester of the 2021-2022 academic year. The data was collected with the “Distance Education Perception Scale” (DEPS) developed by the researcher and consists of two sections. The first part of DEPS includes 15 open and close-ended questions related to the demographic and personal information of students and their attitudes towards distance education. The second section of DEPS includes 71 statements related to perceptions towards the distance education of students on a 5-point Likert-type scale consisting of 5 choices, from 1=Strongly Disagree to 5=Strongly Agree. In the analysis of the data, the statistical package SPSS 21.00 was used. Exploratory Factor Analysis method and Varimax Rotation technique were used to understand whether the DEPS consists of measuring the same quality. The reliability coefficient α formula, and the relationship between the response given to each item in the scale and the total score obtained from the scale was calculated using the Item-Total Correlation technique. Students' perceptions of distance education were evaluated using the median, mode and arithmetic mean on the basis of all scales and subscales.

Findings: The results revealed that the scale used in the collection of data in the research is valid and reliable, students are generally hesitant about distance education and these hesitations increase in terms of practice courses and internship practices, and their perception levels about the benefit and importance of distance education are lower than other dimensions of distance education such as learning and communication, technology and measurement-evaluation. Again, the results of the research show that classroom and opinions and attitudes about distance education are important variables that affect the perceptions of students towards distance education.

Unique contributor to theory, policy and practice: It is expected that the research results will be guiding in terms of developing distance education policies and studies on improving the quality of education in universities, and will make a significant contribution to the national and international literature and researchers working in the field of distance education.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Associated Prof. Dr. Erol Karaca, Anadolu University

Faculty of Education

References

Akbulut, Y. (2010). SPSS applications in social sciences: frequently used statistical analyzes and annotated SPSS solutions. Istanbul: Ideal Culture Publishing.

Alley, L. & Jansak, K. (2001). The ten keys to quality insurence and assesment in online learning. Journal of Interactive Instruction Development, 13(3), 3-18.

Anadolu University Open Education Faculty (2022, June 26). Open education faculty undergraduate programs (4 years). https://www.anadolu.edu.tr/acikogretim/turkiye-programlari/acikogretim-sistemdeki-programlar

Aydemir, M. (2018). Distance education program, course and material design. Ankara: Education Publishing House.

Balaban Tuesday, J. (2018). Qualifications that data collection tools should have. In A. Şimşek (Editor) Research methods in social sciences (134-161). Eskişehir: Anadolu University Publications No: 2653, AÖF Publications No: 1619.

Balaman, F. & Hanbay Tiryaki, S. (2021). Teacher opinions about compulsory distance education due to CoronaVirus (Covid-19). Journal of Human and Social Sciences Research, 10 (1): 52-84.

Başar, M. & Arslan, S. & Günsel, E. & Akpınar, M. (2019). Teacher candidates' perception of distance education. Journal of multidisciplinary studies in education, 3 (2): 14-22. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/jmse/issue/45032/555407

Bates AW. (1995). Technology, Open Learning and Distance Education. London: Routledge.

Baykul, Y. (2000). Measurement in Education and Psychology: Classical Test Theory and Practice, Ankara: ÖSYM Publications.

Bozkurt, A. (2017). Past, present and future of distance education in Turkey, Journal of Open Education Practices and Research, 3 (2): 85-124.

Boz-Yuksekdağ, E & Karaca, E. (2017) The Perception Scale Towards Distance Nursing Education (perstoDNE). International Women Online Journal of Distance Education, 6 (2), 53-66.

Büyüköztürk, Ş. & Kılıç Çakmak, E. & Akgün, Ö. A. & Karadeniz, Ş. & Demirel, F. (2008). Scientific research methods, Ankara: Pegem Akademi.

Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2002). Data analysis handbook (1st ed.). Ankara: Pegem A Publishing.

Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2011). Handbook of data analysis for social sciences, statistics, research design, spss applications and interpretation (15th ed.). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.

Council of Higher Education (2022). All universities with a social work (faculty) program. YÖK Undergraduate Atlas. https://yokatlas.yok.gov.tr/lisans-bolum.php?b=10193

Duman, S. N. (2020). Evaluation of the distance education process carried out during the epidemic period, National Education, 49 (Special Issue 1): 95-112.

Durdu, E. & Albayrak, M. (2020). Evaluation of students' perceptions and attitudes towards distance learning. International Journal of Sciences and Education Research, 6 (2): 252-268.

Egerton,. E. L. (2007). Faculty and students’ perceptions of learner-centered instruction in online nursing education courses. (Unpublished PhD thesis), George Mason University. Available from ProQ,uest Dissertations and Theses database (UMI: 3256274).

Elitaş, T. (2017). New communication technologies in the distance education undergraduate process: Atatürk University distance education center (Unpublished Doctoral Thesis).

Er Türküresin, H. (2020). Examination of distance education practices carried out during the COVID_19 pandemic period in the context of teacher candidates' opinions. Journal of National Education, 49 (1): 597-618. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/1263116

Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS:(and sex, drugs and rock’n’roll). NewYork: Sage.

Gök, B. & Kılıç Çakmak, E. (2020). Distance education perception of instructors teaching in distance education, Kastamonu Education Journal, 28 (5): 1915-1931.

Gökbulut, B. (2021). Distance Education and Mobile Learning from the Perspective of Distance Education Students, Educational Technology Theory and Practice, 11 (1): 160-177.

Gorsuch, R. L. (1974). Factor analysis. Philadelphia: Saunders.

Hair, J. F. & Black, W. & Babin, B. & Anderson, R.E., & Tatham, R.L. (2005). Multivariate data analysis. (5th Edition). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1nDUDWIBnIZ13DihOv742tffpWhDmYI73p3eQSCuJ-W4/edit

Isman, A. (2011). Distance Learning. 4th Edition, Ankara: Pegem A Publications.

Kaiser, H.F. (1958). The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 23, 187-200.

Karaca, E. (2020). Scale development in social work research and the use of SPSS in this process. Eskişehir: Nisan Bookstore.

Karaca, İ., Karaca, N., Karamustafaoğlu, N., and Özcan, M. (2021). Atif Cite Examination of teachers' perceptions of the benefits of distance education. Humanistic Perspective, 3 (1), 209-224. https://doi.org/10.47793/hp.844113

Karasar, N. (2000). Report preparation in research (10th ed.). Ankara: Nobel Publishing Distribution.

Kocayiğit, A. & Uşun, S. (2020). Attitudes of teachers working in schools affiliated to the Ministry of National Education towards distance education (Burdur province example). Eurasia Journal of International Studies, pp (23): 285-299. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/894290

Kurnaz, E. & Serçemeli, M. (2020). A research on academics' perspectives on distance education and distance accounting education during the Covid-19 pandemic period. International Journal of the Academy of Social Sciences, Year: 2, (3): 262-288. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/1163428

Lee, H. B. & Comrey, A. L. (1979). Distortions in a commonly used factor analytic procedure. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 14 (3): 301-321. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr1403_2

Mayers, A. (2013). Introduction to statistics and SPSS in psychology. Pearson Education Limited.

Moçoşoğlu, B. & Kaya, A. (2020). Examining teacher attitudes towards distance education implemented due to coronavirus disease (COVID-19), Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University Education Journal, 2 (1): 15-43.

Moore, M. & Kearsley, G. (2005). Distance Education. A Systems View. 2nd ed. Thomson.

Özdoğan, A. Ç. & Berkant, H. G. (2020). Examining stakeholder views on distance education during the COVID-19 pandemic period, National Education, 49 (Special Issue 1): 13-43.

Paydar, S. & Doğan, A. (2019). Teacher Candidates' Opinions on Open and Distance Learning Environments. Education and Technology, 1 (22): 154-162.

Rea, L. M., & Parker, R. A. (2014). Designing and conducting survey research: a comprehensive guide. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.

Scherer, R. F. & Wiebe F. A.& Luther, D. C. & Adams J. S. (1988). Dimensionality of coping: factor stability using the ways of coping questionnaire. Psychological Reports. 62, 763-770.

Schlosser, L. A. & Simonson, M. (2010). Distance education: Definition and glossary of terms. 3rd Edition, Charlotte, North Carolina: Information Age Publishing.

Seçer, İ. (2015). Practical data analysis with SPSS and LISREL (2nd Edition). Ankara: Anı Publishing.

Taskiran, A. (2021). Management, learning, technology and evaluation dimensions of open and distance learning processes. Journal of Open Education Applications and Research (AUAd), 7(4), 80-98. https://doi.org/10.51948/auad.984969 ).

Tavşancıl, E. & Keser, H. (2002). Development of a Likert-type attitude scale towards internet use. Journal of Educational Sciences, 1, 1, 79-100.

Yavuz, M., Kayalı, B., Balat, Ş. and Karaman, S. (2020). Examination of emergency distance education practices of higher education institutions in Turkey during the epidemic period. National Education, 49 (1): 129-154. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/1255140

Yenal, Ü. (2009). History of the information society. History School Journal, 2009 (5): 123-144. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/144913

Downloads

Published

2024-03-08

How to Cite

Karaca, E. (2024). A Scale Development Study to Determine University Students’ Perceptions towards Distance Education. Journal of Online and Distance Learning, 4(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.47941/jodl.1722

Issue

Section

Articles