Fiscal Systems and Youth Participation in County Governance in Kenya

Authors

  • Muya Ngigi Moses Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology
  • Prof. Wario Guyo Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47941/hrlj.3922

Keywords:

Fiscal Systems, Youth Participation, County Governance

Abstract

Purpose: The general objective of the study was to examine the influence of fiscal systems on youth participation in county governance in Kenya. The study was based on the Souffle Theory.

Methodology: A survey research design was adopted in the study. The study population comprised of the estimated 19,456,356 youths from all the counties in Kenya. The sample size for the study was 400 respondents and they were identified to participate in the research using proportionate stratified and simple sampling techniques respondents. Questionnaires and interview guides were used in the collection of relevant data. Data was analysed and presented using the SPSS software and spread sheets. The study collected both qualitative and quantitative data. Qualitative data was analysed using content analysis. The study adopted a descriptive and inferential statistics to analyse quantitative data to establish the relationship between the independent variables and dependent variables. The findings were presented in tables, figures and charts.

Findings: The study found that fiscal systems had a positive and significant effect on youth participation in county governance in Kenya.

Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: Based on the findings, the study recommends that counties to allocate a portion of the county budget towards programs and initiatives that specifically target youth development and participation. This could include youth empowerment programs, educational opportunities, and mentorship initiatives. County governments should eencourage the active involvement of youth in the county budgeting and planning processes. This can be achieved through consultations, focus groups, and workshops to solicit their input and ideas.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Muya Ngigi Moses, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology

PhD Student

Prof. Wario Guyo, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology

Lecturer

References

Aandstad, A., & Simon, E. V. (2013).Reliability and validity of the soccer specific INTER field test.Journal of sports sciences, 31(13), 1383-1392.

Abdumlingo, H., &Mwirigi, M. F. (2014). Challenges of managing devolved funds in the delivery of services: A case study of Mombasa county. International journal of research in commerce & management, 5(5), 1-4.

Bassett, Ellen M. "Urban Governance in a Devolved Kenya." In Governing Urban Africa, pp. 73-98. Palgrave Macmillan, London, 2016.

Beard, C. (2017). An economic interpretation of the Constitution of the United States.Routledge.

Bernard, H. R., & Bernard, H. R. (2012).Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Sage.

Blattman, C. (2009). From violence to voting: War and political participation in Uganda. American political Science review, 103(2), 231-247.

Cabral, L. (2011). Decentralisation in Africa: Scope, motivations and impact on service delivery and poverty.

Daba, B., &Mulu, F. (2017). Incorporating ‘‘Democratic Developmental State Ideology’’into Ethiopia’s Ethnic Federalism–A Contradiction?.ÜniversiteparkBülten| Universitepark Bulletin.

Dabla-Norris, M. E. (2005). Issues in intergovernmental fiscal relations in China.International Monetary Fund.

Eme, O. I., &Onwuka, C. C. (2010).Bureaucracy and challenges of good governance in Nigeria.Journal of Business and Organizational Development, 2, 37-50.

Emerson, K., &Nabatchi, T. (2015).Evaluating the productivity of collaborative governance regimes: A performance matrix.Public Performance & Management Review, 38(4), 717-747.

Ferrazzi, G., &Rohdewohld, R. (2017).Emerging Practices in Intergovernmental Functional Assignment.Taylor & Francis.

Filippetti, A., &Sacchi, A. (2013). Fiscal Decentralization and Economic Growth Reconsidered: The Role of the Institutional Setting.

Finch, C., &Omolo, A. (2015). Participation in Kenya’s Local Development Funds: Reviewing the Past to Inform the Future. World Bank and Kenya School of Government Working Paper Series, 3.

Gaynor, N. (2013). Decentralisation, Conflict and Peacebuilding in Rwanda.

Hasselskog, M. (2016, May). Participation or what? Local experiences and perceptions of household performance contracting in Rwanda.In Forum for Development Studies (Vol. 43, No. 2, pp. 177-199).Routledge.

Haurovi, M. (2012). The role of cooperative government and intergovernmental relations in promoting effective service delivery.A case study of the Amatole district municipality (Doctoral dissertation, University of Fort Hare).

Institute of Economic Affairs, (2015). Review of status of Public Participation, and County Information Dissemination Frameworks: Case Study of Isiolo, Kisumu, Makueni and Turkana Counties. Institute of Economic Affairs, Nairobi. Kenya

Khemani, S. (2007). Does delegation of fiscal policy to an independent agency make a difference? Evidence from intergovernmental transfers in India.Journal of development Economics, 82(2), 464-484.

Koppenjan, J., &Klijn, E. H. (2015).Governance networks in the public sector. Routledge.

Koul, L. (2009). Methodology Of Educational Research, 4Enew E. Vikas publishing house PVT Ltd.

Kuckartz, U. (2014). Qualitative text analysis: A guide to methods, practice and using software. Sage.

Mayring, P. (2014). Qualitative content analysis: theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software solution.

McConnell, J. (2010). Institution [un] building: Decentralising government and the case of Rwanda.

Osborne, D. en T. Gaebler (1992).Reinventing Government: How the Entrepeneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector.

Ostrom, E. (2005). Self-governance and forest resources.Terracotta reader: A market approach to the environment, 12.

Raadschelders, J. C., & Lee, K. H. (2011). Trends in the study of public administration: Empirical and qualitative observations from Public Administration Review, 2000–2009. Public Administration Review, 71(1), 19-33.

Sebola, M. P. (2014). Ethics in the South African public service: A paradox of culture, politics and ethics in the world of work. Journal of Social Sciences, 40(3), 295-304.

Sein, M. K., Henfridsson, O., Purao, S., Rossi, M., & Lindgren, R. (2011). Action design research.MIS quarterly, 37-56.

Torraco, R. J. (2005). Writing integrative literature reviews: Guidelines and examples. Human resource development review, 4(3), 356-367.

Von Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General system theory. New York, 41973(1968), 40.

Vromen, A., & Collin, P. (2012). Everyday youth participation? Contrasting views from Australian policymakers and young people. Young, 18(1), 97-112.

Yin, R. K. (2017).Case study research and applications: Design and methods. Sage publications.

Yusoff, M. A., Sarjoon, A., & Hassan, M. A. (2016).An Analysis of the Development Impacts of Establishing Kalmunai Administrative District in Sri Lanka.Journal of Sustainable Development, 9(1), 164.

Zulu, T. S. S. (2014). Cooperative Governance in South Africa: A Case Study of Intergovernmental Relations in the Provision of Housing (Doctoral dissertation, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg).

Downloads

Published

2026-08-09

How to Cite

Muya , N. M., & Guyo, W. (2026). Fiscal Systems and Youth Participation in County Governance in Kenya. Human Resource and Leadership Journal, 11(6), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.47941/hrlj.3922

Issue

Section

Articles