Narrative Iconic Signs in EFL Classrooms: A Multimodal Social Semiotic Perspective on Interaction and Learner Creativity

Authors

  • Byamungu Kanyamihigo Dieudonné ECODISP-Bukavu
  • Tembue Zembele Wa Ololo Bukavu Teacher Training College
  • Bapolisi Bahuga Paulin Bukavu Teacher Training College

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47941/jep.3986

Keywords:

Narrative Iconic Signs, Multimodality, Social Semiotics, EFL Classrooms, Teacher– Learner Interaction, Creativity, Visual Narratives

Abstract

Purpose: This study examines the role of narrative iconic signs in supporting teacher-learner interaction and learner creativity in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) classrooms. It identifies the visual resources used by EFL teachers, determines the extent to which narrative iconic signs are integrated into classroom practice, and examines their contribution to learners’ written production.  

Methodology: A descriptive mixed-methods was used with 15 EFL teachers and 636 learners from selected secondary schools in Goma. Data were collected through teacher and learner questionnaires, nonparticipant classroom observations, and learner-produced texts. Quantitative data were analysed using frequencies and percentages, while qualitative data were examined through thematic and textual analysis, focusing on cohesion, coherence, vocabulary use, sequencing, descriptive language, and creativity.  

Findings: Teachers predominantly used static visuals: pictures (86.67%), photographs (80.00 %), drawings (73.33%), diagrams (66.67%), and maps (53.33%). Narrative resources were less common, with pictures sequences reported by 26.67% and narrative picture stories by 20.00% of teachers. Learners expressed positive perceptions of visual resources; 73.90% agreed or strongly agreed that visuals supported comprehension, improved English lessons, and facilitated vocabulary retention. Learner-produced texts showed evidence of idea generation, event sequencing, descriptive expression, and creative interpretation, although grammatical accuracy, cohesion, and lexical choice remained problematic. Teachers identified time constraints, limited training, inadequate materials, and curriculum limitations as barriers.

Unique Contribution to Theory, Policy and Practice: Narrative iconic signs are underused but potentially valuable multimodal resources for interactive and creative EFL teaching. Their use should be combined with explicit instruction in vocabulary, grammar, cohesion, coherence, and writing development.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Byamungu Kanyamihigo Dieudonné, ECODISP-Bukavu

Doctoral Candidate

References

Bal, M. (2017). Narratology: Introduction to the theory of narrative (4th ed.). University of Toronto Press.

Barthes, R. (1964). Elements of semiology. Hill and Wang.

Beaugrande, R. de, & Dressler, W. U. (1981). Introduction to text linguistics. Longman.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Eco, U. (1976). A theory of Semiotics. Indiana University Press.

Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. Longman

Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. Edward Arnold.

Hill, D. A. (1990). Visual impact: Creative language learning through pictures. Longman.

Jewitt, C. (Ed.). (2014). The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis. Routledge.

Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. Routledge.

Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2021). Reading images: The grammar of visual design(3rd). Routledge.

Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413–468). Academic Press.

Maley, A., & Duff, A. (2005). Drama techniques: A resource book of communication activities for language teachers (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Mercer, N. (2000). Words and minds: How we use language to think together. Routledge.

Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. Oxford University Press.

Peirce, C. S. (1931–1958). Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss, & A. W. Burks, Eds.; Vols. 1–8). Harvard University Press.

Saussure, F. de. (2011). Course in general linguistics (W. Baskin, Trans.). Columbia University Press. (Original work published 1916)

Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235–253). Newbury House.

The New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures.

Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60–92. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.66.1.17370n67v22j160u

Todorov, T. (1977). The poetics of prose (R. Howard, Trans.). Cornell University Press.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Walsh, S. (2011). Exploring classroom discourse: Language in action. Routledge.

Wright, A. (1989). Pictures for language learning. Cambridge University Press.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-21

How to Cite

Dieudonné, B. K., Ololo, T. Z., & Paulin, B. B. (2026). Narrative Iconic Signs in EFL Classrooms: A Multimodal Social Semiotic Perspective on Interaction and Learner Creativity. Journal of Education and Practice, 10(8), 17–29. https://doi.org/10.47941/jep.3986

Issue

Section

Articles