Applying the Discourse-Comprehension Approach to the Analysis to Robert Graves’ Recalling War in First and Second Years at Some Colleges in South Kivu Province
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47941/ejl.3887Keywords:
Poetry, Poetry Analysis, Discourse, Comprehension, Discourse-Comprehension ApproachAbstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to apply the Discourse-Comprehension Approach to analyze Robert Graves’ poem Recalling War with first and second-year college students in South Kivu province.
Methodology: The study adopted a qualitative descriptive design based on the discourse-comprehension approach. The poem was analyzed at both formal and semantic levels by examining its structural organization, grammatical categories, rhetorical devices, discourse interactional factors, themes, tone, subject matter, scenario, feelings, effects, punctuation, paralinguistic features and the poet’s communicative intention. The analysis integrated linguistic, stylistic, semantic, pragmatic and reader-oriented perspectives to provide a comprehensive interpretation of the poem.
Findings: The analysis revealed that Recalling War is a five-stanza narrative poem organized around the enduring physical, psychological and social consequences of war. The poem employs a rich combination of nouns, verbs, adjectives, metaphors, imagery, repetition, oxymoron, simile, alliteration, personification, contrast, ellipsis and other rhetorical devices that reinforce its anti-war message. The discourse-comprehension analysis identified war trauma, destruction, fear, hopelessness, psychological suffering and post-war memory as the dominant themes. The serious and warning tone, the selected linguistic and paralinguistic features enable readers to experience pity, compassion, fear and pain while understanding the poet’s intention enables readers to preserve collective memory and warn future generations against the devastating effects of war. The analysis further demonstrated that discourse elements such as language clues, punctuation, interactional context and rhetorical organization work together to facilitate literary comprehension.
Unique contribution to the theory, Policy and Practice: This study contributes to literary studies by demonstrating the effectiveness of the discourse-comprehension approach as an integrated framework for interpreting poetry through linguistic, semantic, stylistic, pragmatic and communicative analysis. It provides literature teachers with a practical model for teaching poetry that promotes deeper comprehension beyond traditional paraphrasing and thematic analysis. The study also offers national curriculum designers a structured analytical framework that can strengthen poetry instruction, literary interpretation and critical thinking in literature courses by integrating discourse analysis into poetry teaching.
Downloads
References
Abrams M.H. (1999). A Glossary of Literary Terms. Boston: Heinle &Heinle.
Adams, H.et al. (1992). Critical Theory Since 1965. Tallahassee: Florida State University Press.
Anderson, C. et al. (1993). Elements of Literature. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Bell, H. (1965). Approach to English Literature. London: Morrison and Gibb Ltd.
Bertens, H. (2001). Literary Theory: The Basics. New York: Routledge.
Bimbala, N.F. (2005). Perception of Poetic Discourse in an EFL context: A case study. PhD. dissertation. Kinshasa: University of Kinshasa.
Bimbala, N.F. (2014). Reading, Understanding and interpreting literary text: toward a discourse-comprehension approach. Kinshasa: Arts Appreciation Collection.
Bimbala, N.F (2013). Exercises in Poetic Discourse Analysis: from Theory to practice. Kinshasa: Arts Appreciation Collection.
Brown, G. et al. (1983). Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brumfit C.J. et al. (1987). Literature and Language Teaching. (2nd ed). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Carter, R. et al. (1989). Language, Discourse and Literature: An Introductory Reader in Discourse Stylistics. London: Unwin Hyman.
Carter, R.et al. (1991). Teaching Literature. New York: Longman Publishing.
Cook, G. (1989). Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cook, G. (1994). Discourse and Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Coulthard, M. (1981). An Introduction to Discourse Analysis. London: Longman.
Coulthard, M. (1994). Advances in Written Text Analysis. London: Routledge.
Culler, J. (1997). Literary Theory: A Very Short Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press Culture.
Daiches, D. (1956). Critical Approaches to Literature. New York: Longman.
Damrosch, L. et al. (2006). Adventure in English Literature. New York: HBJ.
Davies, A. Z., et al. (1984). How to teach poet¬ry: An African perspective. London: Heinemann.
De Beaudrande, R. (1980). Text, Discourse and Process. London: Longman.
Duff, A. et al. (1990). Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Eagleton, T. (1996). Literary theory: An introduction. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Easthope, A. (1989). Poetry as Discourse. London: Methuen.
Fairclough, N. et al. (1997). Critical Discourse Analysis in T.A Van Djik’s Discourse as Structure and Process. London: Sage.
Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. London: Longman.
Fowler, R. (1981). Literature as social discourse: The Practice of Linguistic Criticism. London: Batsford and Academy Limited.
Genette, G. (1982). Figures of Literary Discourse. New York: Columbia University Press.
Gillie, C. (1972). Longman Companion to English Literature. London: Longman.
Guerin, L.W. (2005). A Handbook of Critical Approaches to Literature. New York: O.U.P
Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. London: Edward Arnold.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
Hawthorn, J. (1998). A Glossary of Contemporary Literary Theory. London: Arnold.
Harvey, C.J.D. et al. (1966). Talking of Poetry. Oxford: O.U.P.
Hatch, E. (1992). Discourse and Language Education. Cambridge: C.U.P.
James, S. (1997). Analyzing Literature: A guide for students. Kansas: Longman
Jefferson, A. (1991). Modern Literary Theory. London: B.T. Batsford.
Kambale, M.B. (2008). A Pragmatic Analysis of an Advertisement text as a way into the Analysis of Poetry in Cahiers du Ceruki. 38, 11-19.
Kambale, M.B. (2018). Teaching Shakespeare’s Sonnet XVIII in an EFL context: case of DRC in Cahiers du Ceruki. 55, 1-5.
Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A Paradigm for Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Matterson, S. et al. (2000). Studying Poetry. London: Arnold.
Moody, H. L. B. (1983). Approaches to the study of literature: A practitioner’s view. In Teaching literature overseas: Language-based approaches, ed. C. J. Brumfit, 17–36. Elmsford, NY: Pergamon.
Murray, D. (1989). Literary Theory and Poetry. London: Batsford.
Mushengyezi, A. (2007). 20th Century Literary Theory. Kampala: Makerere University.
Ngitsi, K. (2007). Poetry Analysis: A guideline for Students. Goma: Saibi.
Reeves, J. (1965). Understanding Poetry. New York: Barnes and Noble.
Rice, P. et al. (2001). Modern Literary Theory: A Reader. 4th ed. London: Arnold.
Richards, I. A. (1929). Practical Criticism: A Study of Literary Judgment. London Kegan Paul.
Schiffrin, D. et al. (2001). The Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell.
Schiffrin, D. (1993). Approaches to Discourse. Oxford: Blackwell.
Shaw, H. (1972). Dictionary of Literary Terms. New York. McGraw Hillbook Company.
Short, M. (1992). Reading, Analysing and Teaching Literature. New York: Longman.
The Gold Book- British Literature (2012) A British ¨Poetry Anthology for Learning Language Arts Through Literature. Melrose: Common Sense Press.
Tyson, L. (2006). Critical Theory Today: A User- Friendly Guide. 2ndedition. London: Routledge University Press.
Van Dijk, T.A. (1997). The Study of Discourse in T. Van Dijk: Discourse as Structure and process. London: Sage.
Van Dijk, T. A. (2014). Discourse and Knowledge: A Socio-cognitive Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Mutekulwa Masilya Daniel, M.ed, Prof. Tembue Zembele Wa Ololo, Prof Bapolisi Bahuga Paulin, PhD, Prof Mbokani Kambale Bulambo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
