The Effects of Language Policy on Minority Languages
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47941/ejl.2054Keywords:
Language Policy, Minority Languages, Preservation, Revitalization, Sociolinguistic PerspectiveAbstract
Purpose: The general objective of this study was to investigate the effects of language policy on minority languages.
Methodology: The study adopted a desktop research methodology. Desk research refers to secondary data or that which can be collected without fieldwork. Desk research is basically involved in collecting data from existing resources hence it is often considered a low cost technique as compared to field research, as the main cost is involved in executive’s time, telephone charges and directories. Thus, the study relied on already published studies, reports and statistics. This secondary data was easily accessed through the online journals and library.
Findings: The findings reveal that there exists a contextual and methodological gap relating to language policy on minority languages. Preliminary empirical review revealed that supportive and well-implemented language policies significantly contributed to the preservation and revitalization of minority languages. It found that bilingual education programs and media representation were crucial for maintaining linguistic diversity, but their success depended on adequate resources, trained educators, and community involvement. The study also emphasized the importance of community-driven policies, advocating for a bottom-up approach to ensure cultural sensitivity and sustainability. Overall, the research highlighted the need for comprehensive and inclusive language policies to protect and promote minority languages.
Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: Linguistic Relativity Theory, Language Ecology Theory and Ethnolinguistic Vitality Theory may be used to anchor future studies on the effects of language policy on minority languages. The study recommended integrating sociolinguistic and ecological perspectives into theoretical frameworks, enhancing bilingual and multilingual education, and utilizing modern technology for language preservation. It emphasized robust legislative frameworks to support minority languages, continuous policy evaluation, and active community involvement in language planning. The study also suggested incorporating minority languages into economic and social spheres, promoting international cooperation, and including language preservation in global cultural agendas. These recommendations aimed to advance theory, practice, and policy for better preservation and revitalization of minority languages.
Downloads
References
Bamgbose, A. (2011). African language development and language policy: Challenges and prospects. The Handbook of African Linguistics, 637-646. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444395175.ch39
Eisenlohr, P. (2018). Sounding Islam: Voice, media, and sonic atmospheres in an Indian Ocean world. University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/luminos.51
Giles, H., Bourhis, R. Y., & Taylor, D. M. (1977). Towards a theory of language in ethnic group relations. In H. Giles (Ed.), Language, Ethnicity and Intergroup Relations (pp. 307-348). Academic Press.
Grenoble, L. A., & Whaley, L. J. (2015). Language documentation: Preserving linguistic diversity. Annual Review of Anthropology, 44, 337-354. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102214-014213
Haugen, E. (1972). The Ecology of Language: Essays by Einar Haugen. Stanford University Press.
Kamwangamalu, N. M. (2013). Language policy and economics: The case of South Africa. Current Issues in Language Planning, 14(3-4), 423-439. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2013.827072
Marmion, D., Obata, K., & Troy, J. (2014). Community, identity, wellbeing: The report of the Second National Indigenous Languages Survey. Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies. https://doi.org/10.4225/55/5882a7f5b3f8a
May, S. (2012). Language and minority rights: Ethnicity, nationalism, and the politics of language. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203868743
McCarty, T. L., & Nicholas, S. E. (2014). Reclaiming Indigenous languages: A reconsideration of the roles and responsibilities of schools. Review of Research in Education, 38(1), 106-136. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X13507894
Moseley, C. (2012). The UNESCO Atlas of the World's Languages in Danger: Context and process. UNESCO Digital Library. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199571888.013.0034
Norris, M. J. (2018). Canada's Indigenous languages: Policies and programs for revitalization. Canadian Diversity, 16(2), 24-30. https://doi.org/10.25318/82-003-x201800101860
Owu-Ewie, C., & Eshun, E. S. (2015). The use of English as medium of instruction at the upper basic level (primary four to junior high school) in Ghana: From theory to practice. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(3), 132-140. https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v5n3p53
Sato, M. (2017). The revitalization of Ainu language: Policy and practice. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 2017(246), 141-163. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl-2017-0039
Siqueira, E., & Petter, M. (2012). Language policies and linguistic rights in Brazil. Language Problems and Language Planning, 36(2), 122-145. https://doi.org/10.1075/lplp.36.2.02siq
UNESCO. (2012). Atlas of the World's Languages in Danger. UNESCO. Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000216419
Waite, J. (2014). Aotearoa/New Zealand's language policy and planning: The case of Māori language revitalization. Current Issues in Language Planning, 15(2), 201-221. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2014.939479
Whorf, B. L. (1956). Language, Thought, and Reality: Selected Writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. MIT Press.
Williams, C. H. (2013). Language policy and planning: Critique of Welsh language planning. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 2013(225), 7-33. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl-2013-0035
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Peter Smith
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
